I generally point put at this stage to people touting conspiracy theories (and I myself have hinted questioned the police force many times); that limiting one's focus with such a theory is generally a wasted effort. To consider such a theory, we must believe that all the police involved with handling the phone, and all those police that knew about it would turn a blind eye. Now mothers and fathers are police officers and keeping evidence such as TH's phone does not only have legal ramifications but also personal ones. To suggest police would willingly keep such evidence quiet is very far fetched. If there is some operating in the BB community, do you really think the police force is going to protect a killer?
I'm quite disappointed to see such a limited perspective and that a member of this group would tell another to open their eyes to a conspiracy theory. The thing that makes this page great is the various perspectives and avenues for information and opinion. It's just like GM saying I know what happened, TH ran off and joined a hippy cult.
Not cool.
I wonder how many times a police officer has been told by an outranking officer to stop their investigations even when their entire existence tells they should keep investigating.Oh, I have taken this into account. The police force were accused of doing this during the Ivan Milat case by a person named Alister Shipsey. The allegation was that they framed IM for the murders because the Olympic games were coming to AUS and that the muders were chasing the $$ away.
Once again, imagine why some of these people joined the police force. Now consider that for this to work, all the members of the BB police would have to be in agreement, otherwise, there's no secrecy. All the coppers involved would have to comply with this rhetoric. The next thing we have to consider is that outside agencies are also part of the investigation, and one way or another if the BB police were withholding evidence, there is a chance they would be discovered. I mean there are a lot of reasons why this theory is questionable. Then we must consider the systems within the police force and justice departments and how it was decided to protect a potential killer, and how that works with other departments. It's an unlikely suggestion.
I generally point put at this stage to people touting conspiracy theories (and I myself have hinted questioned the police force many times); that limiting one's focus with such a theory is generally a wasted effort. To consider such a theory, we must believe that all the police involved with handling the phone, and all those police that knew about it would turn a blind eye. Now mothers and fathers are police officers and keeping evidence such as TH's phone does not only have legal ramifications but also personal ones. To suggest police would willingly keep such evidence quiet is very far fetched. If there is some operating in the BB community, do you really think the police force is going to protect a killer?
I'm quite disappointed to see such a limited perspective and that a member of this group would tell another to open their eyes to a conspiracy theory. The thing that makes this page great is the various perspectives and avenues for information and opinion. It's just like GM saying I know what happened, TH ran off and joined a hippy cult.
Not cool.
Some of the early reports that had am and pm mixed up came from Belgian newspapers and not from disclosed Police reports.I remember initially they kept misreporting times and got the AM and PM mixed up just had not seen it put like this with the couple hours after part.
My point is to question everything, even the perceived police activity and position.
Do you do everything your supervisor tells you, especially if it goes against your moral code? I wouldn't.I wonder how many times a police officer has been told by an outranking officer to stop their investigations even when their entire existence tells they should keep investigating.
Perhaps along with the reading on the coroner, people can read about police investigations going bad. And the many reasons why investigations can go bad.
It doesn’t have to be the entire force...one or two high ranking officers with a lot of sway can effect whole police departments..
Once again it’s great reading.....I’m not saying the Byron bay police did this with this investigation...
That kid getting assaulted by the police office that was played in the podcast shows that even the Byron police can make poor decisions
Imo
Do you do everything your supervisor tells you, especially if it goes against your moral code? I wouldn't.
But I do agree that the BB police force are making illogical or 'easy' conclusions.
Me personally I wouldn’t,,, but that’s why I’m not a cop or in the armed forces.Do you do everything your supervisor tells you, especially if it goes against your moral code? I wouldn't.
But I do agree that the BB police force are making illogical or 'easy' conclusions.
Maybe partly because there is hope. There are also unanswered questions, some that may never be answered.Why haven’t Theo’s family come out and taken what the police have said for gospel?
As musso and I have tried to point out, it is eye opening when a person realises how much police have done behind the scene - without family knowledge, without public knowledge.
I sometimes wonder if the police have discovered exactly why Theo was at the headlands that night - and they are not revealing that info due to Theo being an adult and, as such, he is entitled to privacy in his personal life.
No need for you & Musso to point that out as I for one am quite aware. My point was, until all cards are laid evenly on the table for all to see, question everything.
Oh you would as the family. Their grief defies words and logic. It’d be all encompassing and they would need to make sure they did everything possible for Theo and for themselves. We also wouldn’t be hear chewing so long over each part if their suspicions and perspective didn’t hold some water. It’s hard to understand why the police haven’t been clear and direct with their findings and information, at the very least with the family, except that there’s no body, and their findings aren’t watertight.Maybe partly because there is hope. There are also unanswered questions, some that may never be answered.
I've wondered if, at a psychological level, it may be 'easier' (poor use of word) to channel grief and doubt into 'something'. Everyone wants answers.
An unknown fate leaves hope.
I think loss and grief and doubt can have many faces and some that only show their face at different times.Oh you would as the family. Their grief defies words and logic. It’d be all encompassing and they would need to make sure they did everything possible for Theo and for themselves. We also wouldn’t be hear chewing so long over each part if their suspicions and perspective didn’t hold some water. It’s hard to understand why the police haven’t been clear and direct with their findings and information, at the very least with the family, except that there’s no body, and their findings aren’t watertight.
You may have noticed that I was not responding to a post by you.
And I don't believe that the poster that I was responding to - about the subject - was replying, in their post, to you either.
This thread has many participating members, some of who may not be aware of the revelations of an inquest.
I think loss and grief and doubt can have many faces and some that only show their face at different times.
I've tried to deal with the loss of an ex partner who took her own life. I want answers but I will never have them. I want to hold people who made her life difficult towards the end responsible. I feel that way at times. I can't go back and say 'wake up to yourself' or try and make things better like I could when we were together. I can't change it but there's a desire to hold some responsible to some extent at times.
I’ve been thinking for a while that the investigation could have been bungled. Maybe they thought it was just an easy, open and shut case but then as more info came in, the realisation that a more thorough investigation was needed and maybe they jumped the gun in their assumption and instead of covering a crime, they cover incompetence?As musso and I have tried to point out, it is eye opening when a person realises how much police have done behind the scene - without family knowledge, without public knowledge.
I sometimes wonder if the police have discovered exactly why Theo was at the headlands that night - and they are not revealing that info due to Theo being an adult and, as such, he is entitled to privacy in his personal life.
Good point this.. esp when emotions are involved pointing the finger at someone is very easy to do and sometimes it’s needed!Maybe partly because there is hope. There are also unanswered questions, some that may never be answered.
I've wondered if, at a psychological level, it may be 'easier' (poor use of word) to channel grief and doubt into 'something'. Everyone wants answers.
An unknown fate leaves hope.
So sorry you experienced that Buster, and totally understand, agree and relate. Hoping also that you’re being kind to you have forgiving yourself if needed.I think loss and grief and doubt can have many faces and some that only show their face at different times.
I've tried to deal with the loss of an ex partner who took her own life. I want answers but I will never have them. I want to hold people who made her life difficult towards the end responsible. I feel that way at times. I can't go back and say 'wake up to yourself' or try and make things better like I could when we were together. I can't change it but there's a desire to hold some responsible to some extent at times.