It'd be interesting to see if the roles were reversed and the male was being violent with the female, then all the feminists would be in uproar over the drunken violence towards women etc. If the male was drunk and beating up the female because he was drunk, then again, there would be hell to pay for the male, cant control his alchohol, beating up on a woman.
But when I read whats written here, I read excuses for the female to be violent towards a male. Please tell me when its appropriate to go back to someones apartment and be violent towards them, threaten them etc. (you might say because he's giving her alcohol) I don't read about him forcing the alcohol down her throat, shes an adult, has willingly gone back to his apartment and willingly drunk alcohol and is willingly being violent towards someone (as per the records). How would those on WS take it if Tostee had have been a female too, which side would you have taken then? (poses an interesting thought)
Hey, Tostee maybe an *******, made bad decisions or whatever, but from what I've read from the posters from WS here, it to me looks allot like double standards.
We should start a pole who thinks it's ok for a woman to be violent to a male?