Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #10

[bearbear]

i hope if bs knows where william is hes not playing stupid power games and feeling important with all the attention and refusing to speak!
also wonder if hes covering for someone else who did hurt william and maybe done it before? [modsnip]

 

[krig101]

If he is convicted with the historical allegations I think a plea bargain for a lesser charge will be the only way he will possibly talk. I keep thinking about poor William having Asthma........

 

[krig101]

I know it's not admissible in court but I have wondered if BS has taken a polygraph.

 

[bearbear]

ill bet bs hasnt taken a polygraph and they probably wouldnt even suggest one as its not admissable, but if you were innocent wouldnt you at least offer to have one?

 

[krig101]

ill bet bs hasnt taken a polygraph and they probably wouldnt even suggest one as its not admissable, but if you were innocent wouldnt you at least offer to have one?

He was very forthcoming to give DNA so I wonder. They are not admissible in court here in the U.S but police seem to use them a lot.

 

[L2L]

If he is convicted with the historical allegations I think a plea bargain for a lesser charge will be the only way he will possibly talk. I keep thinking about poor William having Asthma........

Yes, but I figured he'd grab at the chance of a plea bargain by now, get off more leniently and let the others go down. Wrong, it seems.

 

[bearbear]

yes i wonder if he gave dna willingly or had to be talked into it?
i guess if you hadnt left your dna on a child but passed them on, or knew the child would never be found in time, then you could feel safe offering a sample?

 

[Angeline]

If he is convicted with the historical allegations I think a plea bargain for a lesser charge will be the only way he will possibly talk. I keep thinking about poor William having Asthma........

Good one. That might be the plan.

Bearbear - I think along the same lines as you. It's hard to discuss it without involving people who are not POIs.

Are there wives of pedos who sometimes know about these things but go into complete denial?

 

[bearbear]

Yes, but I figured he'd grab at the chance of a plea bargain by now, get off more leniently and let the others go down. Wrong, it seems.

maybe if hes is protecting someone hes scared what will all come out if he gives them up?
what that person will tell?

 

[they'll get you]

if bs is linked with these other men and their criminal history dates way back to the 80s, they may have all slid under the radar if william hadnt gone missing, now theyre being exposed and hopefully imprisoned for a long time. bs must be outraged!!
because there was a global alert issued to other crime stoppers, i really hope little williams image wasnt seen on someones paedo computer!

This is a from an ABC Four corners about how the police found two pedophiles exploiting a little boy who they adopted.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xufh8XysHJ4

 

[krig101]

yes i wonder if he gave dna willingly or had to be talked into it?
i guess if you hadnt left your dna on a child but passed them on, or knew the child would never be found in time, then you could feel safe offering a sample?

Was it Colin who mentioned BS voluntarily giving the DNA sample? I have to go find the article.

ETA: maybe not, articles just say gave a sample. Colin has been awfully quiet lately!

 

[bearbear]

Good one. That might be the plan.

Bearbear - I think along the same lines as you. It's hard to discuss it without involving people who are not POIs.

Are there wives of pedos who sometimes know about these things but go into complete denial?

i know, and its so hard to discuss and im so grateful mods have allowed our posts to stay!


i think ms has gone into denial and there are a lot of wives of paedos who turn a blind eye because they dont want to be alone and they think their partner is a "good"man in other ways, good earner, status, companion stability etc
and a lot of paedophiles find women with low self esteem, lonely, with children and on it goes!
something on the news recently warning women on dating sites not to advertise they have children or post their photos etc

 

[ozazure]

I just revisited all the "pedophile ring" articles that came out sandwiched between William's parents interview and Bill Spedding's arrest. There is reference to a "fast moving investigation" and Spedding is arressted within the week. There was also the warning that “If you have knowledge and you have not come forward, you could be complicit,” with regards to William, (link) and then confirmation in court that there are others involved in his 1980's alleged crime. Nicely done. Were accomplices or witnesses given a small window to crawl through before Bill's arrest? Can you imagine the communications that might have occured that week? Love to know who was ringing/emailing/texting/popping around for a cuppa that week with Bill and Margaret. I bet the police do!

It will be interesting when it is all said and done (and it will be in due time) what happened during April to reveal connections between Bill and others. Wern't the 1980 alleged crimes brought to the police's attention again by the victim when his home was searched initially? I read that here, not sure where that came from. Anyway, there was a delay between his home being searched and this chain of events. It would be great to have a timeline for this case. I am flat chat with my study atm else I'd give it a go.

In one of the pedophile ring articles it is quoted that they have a fair idea what took place that day. I think it won't be too long in the scheme of things until we hear more.

 

[truth is out there]

i hope if bs knows where william is hes not playing stupid power games and feeling important with all the attention and refusing to speak!
also wonder if hes covering for someone else who did hurt william and maybe done it before[modsnip]?

I got the impression, watching his body language in that interview, that he could very well play power games!

 

[Angeline]

Yes, it's those comments from police that make me think they've got this.

They have been sooo careful with their words for so long, and suddenly, bam! They've been very confident and forthcoming lately.

 

[Puggle]

With what I found today [modsnip]

 

[Puggle]

I just revisited all the "pedophile ring" articles that came out sandwiched between William's parents interview and Bill Spedding's arrest. There is reference to a "fast moving investigation" and Spedding is arressted within the week. There was also the warning that “If you have knowledge and you have not come forward, you could be complicit,” with regards to William, (link) and then confirmation in court that there are others involved in his 1980's alleged crime. Nicely done. Were accomplices or witnesses given a small window to crawl through before Bill's arrest? Can you imagine the communications that might have occured that week? Love to know who was ringing/emailing/texting/popping around for a cuppa that week with Bill and Margaret. I bet the police do!

It will be interesting when it is all said and done (and it will be in due time) what happened during April to reveal connections between Bill and others. Wern't the 1980 alleged crimes brought to the police's attention again by the victim when his home was searched initially? I read that here, not sure where that came from. Anyway, there was a delay between his home being searched and this chain of events. It would be great to have a timeline for this case. I am flat chat with my study atm else I'd give it a go.

In one of the pedophile ring articles it is quoted that they have a fair idea what took place that day. I think it won't be too long in the scheme of things until we hear more.

I firmly believe with what I found today..the statement to come forward was not a strategy. ..it was a real threat....someone has blabbed to save their own neck IMO.... and this happened back in March

 

[bearbear]

if a person was involved in a crime but someone else was very much more involved, would police arrest the first person if they were willing to give evidence and to keep them protected?

 

[Puggle]

I just revisited all the "pedophile ring" articles that came out sandwiched between William's parents interview and Bill Spedding's arrest. There is reference to a "fast moving investigation" and Spedding is arressted within the week. There was also the warning that “If you have knowledge and you have not come forward, you could be complicit,” with regards to William, (link) and then confirmation in court that there are others involved in his 1980's alleged crime. Nicely done. Were accomplices or witnesses given a small window to crawl through before Bill's arrest? Can you imagine the communications that might have occured that week? Love to know who was ringing/emailing/texting/popping around for a cuppa that week with Bill and Margaret. I bet the police do!

It will be interesting when it is all said and done (and it will be in due time) what happened during April to reveal connections between Bill and others. Wern't the 1980 alleged crimes brought to the police's attention again by the victim when his home was searched initially? I read that here, not sure where that came from. Anyway, there was a delay between his home being searched and this chain of events. It would be great to have a timeline for this case. I am flat chat with my study atm else I'd give it a go.

In one of the pedophile ring articles it is quoted that they have a fair idea what took place that day. I think it won't be too long in the scheme of things until we hear more.

oh, wish you could post!!! but don't want you to get in trouble! but now my mind is wondering about what you know!

Ohh so do I ....But I also know if everyone knew it would also hurt the investigation if Im right. They need to wrap this up quickly...before any other accomplices in past crimes slip out of their hands....but am feeling happy to know...the police do know what happened...

 

[Puggle]

I just revisited all the "pedophile ring" articles that came out sandwiched between William's parents interview and Bill Spedding's arrest. There is reference to a "fast moving investigation" and Spedding is arressted within the week. There was also the warning that “If you have knowledge and you have not come forward, you could be complicit,” with regards to William, (link) and then confirmation in court that there are others involved in his 1980's alleged crime. Nicely done. Were accomplices or witnesses given a small window to crawl through before Bill's arrest? Can you imagine the communications that might have occured that week? Love to know who was ringing/emailing/texting/popping around for a cuppa that week with Bill and Margaret. I bet the police do!

It will be interesting when it is all said and done (and it will be in due time) what happened during April to reveal connections between Bill and others. Wern't the 1980 alleged crimes brought to the police's attention again by the victim when his home was searched initially? I read that here, not sure where that came from. Anyway, there was a delay between his home being searched and this chain of events. It would be great to have a timeline for this case. I am flat chat with my study atm else I'd give it a go.

In one of the pedophile ring articles it is quoted that they have a fair idea what took place that day. I think it won't be too long in the scheme of things until we hear more.

oh, wish you could post!!! but don't want you to get in trouble! but now my mind is wondering about what you know!

if a person was involved in a crime but someone else was very much more involved, would police arrest the first person if they were willing to give evidence and to keep them protected?

Im not sure about being 'Very Much more...maybe knowledge of..or complicant to past offences...Could have simply been a reaction to the heat on Bill thst thid othrr person knew his goose would be cooked eventually ....may or may not have had any part to do with William...sorry for typos..phone is crap