IMO it has been obvious to me that William was abducted (in a car) since it was reported that the sniffer dog lost his scent at the beginning of the driveway. Those dogs IMO are very reliable yet the bush searches still went on.
I agree Estelle
There was a lot of mention of the front of the house early on.
Mum at a front window able to see down the street.
William missing from front yard.
Then the focus was all about the side of the house.
Even Colin informed us BS had walked down the side of the house 4 days earlier.
Mum never actually said down the side or back of the house in the interview - just it was 2 to 3 meters.
The porch looks to be 2 to 3 meters to the carport area.
P: And when you arrived no doubt the kids jumped out of the car and ran to nanna.
D: He (William) is always looking out for me and my car
and I was on my way back......He would not wander he would not even cross the
street by himself.
M: If somebody were to entice him across the
road he wouldn't do it , he'd run back.
M: We were going to wait for Dad to come home ....we were going to go out - we had our day planned.
Jubelin: You see a kid on the road.
Jubelin: were talking about a minute or two when William was not supervised.
Mum thought immediately he had been taken.
I know it has been said that no one heard a thing.
Is it possible that they did and thought it was Dad arriving back William darts off to greet dad at the place he had jumped out to run to nanna through the carport to the road....1 or 2 minutes no Dad no William.
No it was not Dad - hence confusion as to whether he was with Dad and Mums immediate thought her son had been grabbed and moved on.
I am assuming that Dad parked the car in the carport because the bikes are there.
Sorry guys I just cannot help thinking about this little fella and nothing seems to make any sense.
I hope there is some news real soon.
http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...full-transcript-from-william-tyrrells-parents