Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #17

[Makara]

I'm a bit thick, and I can't understand your answer. I need it spelled out.

No you don't. His name is William Tyrrell. Let's leave it at that.

 

[Makara]

My knowledge stems from WS thread: not the real name and mistakes in spelling the "fake" name Tyrell/Tyrrell. How could I be able to know more, if nobody knows more?

It's not a fake name. His name is William Tyrrell.

 

[frogwell]

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-12/missing-three-year-old-boy/5740476

At what stage were the media 1st advised on the parameters of how they had to report this case I wonder?

 

[frogwell]

It's not a fake name. His name is William Tyrrell.

LOL. OK thankyou for the clarity.

 

[Amee]

William Tyrrell's names was formerly spelt "Tyrell". Police have now advised the correct spelling is "Tyrrell"

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/william-t...ings-house-20150302-13tebj.html#ixzz3nJOZHSNE
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook

 

[crabstick]

Atrocious editing. The grammer is appalling. That could mean anything.
More than likely it was the media spelling the surname incorrect.

William Tyrrell's names was formerly spelt "Tyrell". Police have now advised the correct spelling is "Tyrrell"

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/william-t...ings-house-20150302-13tebj.html#ixzz3nJOZHSNE
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook

 

[Froglady]

Remember the Morcombes? Daniel had a twin!
That didn't stop the Morcombes doing what they had to do.

Your right it didnt but he would have been known wherever he went after daniel dissapeared. Not only because they looked alike but because he was shown on tv. I'm not saying I do or don't agree with it but I do understand why they would want to protect the other child.

 

[Froglady]

I can't really see how seeing their faces makes it more likely that William is found. Can someone convince me?

My thoughts exactly. In the interview you heard the pain in their voices. What other ways would it help? He wasn't taken in public so it's not that people need to see them incase it jogs someone's memory. It's more the future of being known as the little boy who went missings sister. That's what I took from the interview.

 

[Deleted member 102539]

Sigh, an everlasting walk on eggshells in this case of a little missing boy ...

 

[Froglady]

Sleuthers are curious people. I dare say we would all love to see the faces of this poor kids missing family but it is what it is....

 

[Karinna]

I think showing faces and explaining the actual situation would lift the veil of secrecy that has spawned so many crazy rumours and allegations against the extended families. If we could remove that crap then more people could invest better time into finding William, not to mention giving the families a break from online sledging.

I think this case is unusual to some other missing child cases because William was a fostered child. I also think in any other high profile missing child cases the immediate family are always looked at carefully because in a lot of these types of cases a parent has had something to do with the fact the child is missing, and LE always investigate family first because of those reasons. Once immediate family have been ruled out then the investigation proceeds further afield outside of family members. And now with SM and FB pages dedicated to missing children, there are always people with very nasty and negative views when it comes to cases as sensitive as these types of cases are where a child is involved, and i agree all the secrecy surrounding this case is only fuelling more negativity, which is just human nature because people think there is stuff being hidden from what the real situation is. I also think families need to stay away from SM if it is affecting them in such a way where they are being further upset by other people's opinions. All IMO.

 

[lampshade1]

The level of suppression in this case is mind boggling, and unprecedented. It has never been seen to this extent before in Australia. This will be a case that journalistic and investigative academia will be taking apart and studying in the future.

I sincerely hope that it has been for the greater good, and hasn't simply been seized on my investigators as an excuse to control/censor publicly known information in a bid to make their jobs so much easier.

Perhaps this is a stupid question although how are journalists (or anyone) advised of court suppression orders? Are these suppression rulings available somewhere?

As otherwise I can't see how anyone (in general not on Websleuths) can legally be prohibited from publishing an article/free speech if they do not know that someone (a judge I presume) has decided that that particular information is not allowed to be published in the first place?

 

[lampshade1]

What we are not being told is who acted the suppression, and why did they act the suppression

Spiderman once lived opposite the POI. Now that is dome news.

So POI lived opposite WT inI Wagga? And ended up up at GMs?
That is one hell of a powerball if it true.

You go to a clairvoyant. Why?
Because you want people to think you already dont know the answer?
There is a river of poison running through Australia. It stinks of self preservation.
The stench builds and builds. At some point the smell ends up somewhere.

Source? Or speculation?

 

[crabstick]

Please read the thread. The source is in this thread. There is even a post number in one my posts to the source post. Im not doing it again, especially on a phone.
And check for question marks please. That means its asking a question.

Post #478. There is another post regarding. If you click on your quote it should take you back to the post with a quote to the source.

Source? Or speculation?

 

[Wexford]

One of many errors in the media, WT case or another.
But why is this so important, if the full name - whether with 2 x R or 1 x R - anyway is not really true?

Every single MSM spelt it wrong? Sloppy journalism by everyone?? I dont imagine it affected the search for William in any way at all, but it probably sent a few journos on a wild goose chase for a while.

 

[Hilly]

Reply to zigzy #16 #763

Positon of WT when FD left to get reception.


Sorry it took so long to reply.
I have been on holidays not much internet connection, which was kind of nice.

in my comment I should have said that it was where I thought WT and FM were standing to say goodbye to FD (driveway IMO).

I was thinking if WT and FM went down to the road to say goodbye to FD that morning, you'd think it's something the police would have let out to the public.

zigzy you must have been terrified seeing that guy walk off with your little one. Quick thinking by you to scare him off.

 

[Karo]

There has been no indication that there was any contact ordered.

Permission would be required from the department in the event that the intrastate trip coincided with court-ordered contact with the biological family.

 

[Found]

I feel so lonely in my opinion that showing the parents' faces is unlikely to make a difference at this point, at least if their message so far has been correctly directed. It's clear from their words and actions how important this is to them, what exactly would be the course of action on their end or that of a lawyer's to bypass previously enacted legislation? Serious question.

And if it were to succeed, I can only imagine it being clickbait/TV revenue.. "The NEVER BEFORE SEEN parents speak! See it HERE FIRST!" and so forth.. it just sounds distracting and a bureaucratic waste at this point.
Especially since anybody who cares about William isn't sleeping or working very much while assisting in the search, or so I would imagine.

The most heartfelt pleas I've ever heard or seen probably came from Morgan Harrington's parents, and her killer was only caught years later because of another victim, Hannah Graham. The Harringtons, who remained MORE than fully visible in the media for years, described the look he gave them in court when they were finally able to face him as "evil." Which is what I think we're dealing with here, unfortunately.

I may just be seriously not understanding some media/legal/cryptic posting nuances, and I don't mean any offense by it.

Yes I agree. What more do the public need to be told? Even if there was no gag on them they have stated they still would not go public to protect their other child. I respect that. There has been controlled media releases from the police to help find him. We coach a local football team and many parents will not allow photos used publicly to protect their children due to domestic situations and I guarantee if the parents went public some horrible media would show their daughter. We all know William had a rough start as it has been stated so why does everyone have to keep the pressure on about disclosing themselves.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Makara]

Every single MSM spelt it wrong? Sloppy journalism by everyone?? I dont imagine it affected the search for William in any way at all, but it probably sent a few journos on a wild goose chase for a while.

Exactly! They all copy each other. There is not much really good investigative journalism anymore. The majority of them are just like sheep.

 

[Makara]

Yes I agree. What more do the public need to be told? Even if there was no gag on them they have stated they still would not go public to protect their other child. I respect that. There has been controlled media releases from the police to help find him. We coach a local football team and many parents will not allow photos used publicly to protect their children due to domestic situations and I guarantee if the parents went public some horrible media would show their daughter. We all know William had a rough start as it has been stated so why does everyone have to keep the pressure on about disclosing themselves.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well said Found and I totally agree.