Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #23

[Warshawski]

I can't view but don't for a minute doubt your perception.

 

[krig101]

just advertised seven news tomorrow, thursday, a criminal profiler looks at williams case and spotlights who should be under investigation

Thanks bearbear! Please keep us updated. Australia is about 14 hours ahead of me and I still get lost with the time difference! [emoji3]

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

[Bohemian]

Did anyone find the full length video? Although the duration says 21 mins it actually goes for 8 mins. Was there a longer version once?

This is all I could find, richie, and I think all up it's the complete interview. Maybe the 21:37 was an error on the user's part or it was the time they uploaded it?

The moment William went missing: parents speak
AntiPatikCorap
Published 16 April 2015

Raw footage of:

1. Interview.

https://youtu.be/8YJvNcJvhWU

2. Appeal.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RTT3JG7DA00

 

[Warshawski]

http://video.news.com.au/v/333835/Wi...full-interview

Just getting back to the comment when the police asked when they last saw WT. Why would the FF reply for the mother about when she last saw him. Why would he not just say the last time he saw WT? Maybe they are just used to talking for each other. MOO

a minion thanks for the link Frogie. I forced myself to LISTEN but not WATCH.. That was intensive, many times I wanted to opt out,but persevered .

For a long time into, I was having real difficulty with FM's persona and output. FD seemed to me, much more genuinely beret of William's disappearance, and also of his loss in their lives.

FM appeared as if she was 'primed for delivery, devoid of emotion' (until the closing stages) ..... Reserving comment ..

 

[Warshawski]

At 1:36 - I can hear a naaa from mum.

Are you certain? I listened to this for the first time with no other senses involved but sound - it took on a whole other perspective for me,

 

[Deleted member 102539]

In this interview dad says
4:03
I recall seeing him taking all the toys out of Nanas cupboard and bringing them to the play room.................
He was just starting to get into...I think he had already got into his outfit, his spiderman outfit.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...k/news-story/a01f0873e1df51515a73d8bfdb0e4f9f

Reminds me somehow on the Deorr Kunz' parent's interview and other things too reminds me on this (FGM/GGP Walton) ... sorry, but can't change. They would have known in advance they would be interviewed by TV and then they don't know precisely all important things and have to begin a sentence twice to get the right statement ...?? Very suspect to me not only today but since long ago.

 

[Deleted member 102539]

At 1:36 - I can hear a naaa from mum.

To what question or to what her husband had said??

 

[Bohemian]

Are you certain? I listened to this for the first time with no other senses involved but sound - it took on a whole other perspective for me,

It might be like the of the dress that went 'viral'. Blue and black? Or ehite and gold?

Listen to this one (from approx 1:30) snd see what you think:

https://youtu.be/8YJvNcJvhWU

 

[1968]

The police seem extremely sure the parents aren't involved and have ruled them out very early on. What they told police must have panned out in terms of alibi and corroborating evidence. Grandmas and the sisters evidence too. If there are inconsistencies perhaps it is due to the emotions and stress involved of that morning; and the mounting horror and absolute panic they must have felt when they could not find William. I'm thinking perhaps they are aware they will be looked at - think Patsy and John Ramsey......and also perhaps feel obscurely guilty a precious child in their care has been lost....

 

[sosocurious]

To what question or to what her husband had said??

The interviewer asked
When did you guys last see William.
Mum answered - That morning 12th September at Mums place.
Dad - about 10:15.
Mum - No.

Maybe Mum was saying No, meaning we did not see him at 10:15.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YJvNcJvhWU&feature=youtu.be

 

[Bohemian]

To what question or to what her husband had said??

KEY:

P = Police
D = Dad
M = Mum

'P: When did you guys last see him?

M: That morning, on the 12th at Mum’s place

D: About 10.15am.'

M: No(?)

Read the full transcript here:

http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...full-transcript-from-william-tyrrells-parents

 

[sosocurious]

KEY:

P = Police
D = Dad
M = Mum

'P: When did you guys last see him?

M: That morning, on the 12th at Mum’s place

D: About 10.15am.'

M: No(?)

Read the full transcript here:

http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...full-transcript-from-william-tyrrells-parents

Ditto Bo

 

[Deleted member 102539]

I wonder what prompted your thoughts FromGermany. .. I was intrigued in the outcome of BS brief appearance today to hear that 'some witnesses are now deceased' which is apparently to be expected in historical proceedings (my wording!) I just wonder - Who is deceased & to what were they a Witness ? Witness is (IMO) a pretty big tag to wear..

That's easy: I googled Missing children NSW and Google came up with the news article. Little spiderman's case is included. When I read about the denying of the suspect in above case I thought of BS - of course!!

 

[Deleted member 102539]

And perhaps then grandma thought to get a cup of tea ...

....... or grandma had a healing leg and didn't go for some tea if her daughter was anyway inside the home ...................

 

[bearbear]

Thank you BearBear, I agree re the possible destruction of immediate evidence - however I will say "Why the F$): NOT" in response to the suggested excuse of 'oh I'm scared so I won't say anything'.

Now I am speaking to anyone with a quandary over the situation ..


... And I can't be any gentler than to say - Wake Up - Wake Up -IF there is even a HINT, if it fleets across your mind, if you have questions - Trust In You and in Your Instincts. There is no reason to be afraid of speaking up. Everything you say will be anonymous - unless it becomes bigger - in which case you will be safety assured .
Think about the person who could / would do this . There are no boundaries here - even the most hardened criminals in our jails have no time or regard for those who commit crimes against our children.

WHY would you turn a blind eye, why would you excuse ? Why would you harbour, why would you honour, why would your feed, why would you enable ...

And and because You Do and because You Have, YOU are also guilty of this preposterous & unacceptable violation of this child and also of his family.

Yep, all this is simply my opinion in the scheme of, and in recognition of, the Websleuth's rules, but I challenge YOU to test it, and to see how it play out - Wake Up !

i completely agree, somebody is protecting someone and they need to come forward now, and can remain totally anonymous

in trying to understand that persons perspective though, i can understand they maybe trying to protect the life they have, especially if they are older and lived with this person a long time and built their life around them and iits become normal for them to turn a blind eye, there would also be shame and embarrassment, it would be easier for them to say nothing

 

[sosocurious]

AJ in court tomorrow. I wonder if we will hear anything about that?

 

[Deleted member 102539]

KEY:

P = Police
D = Dad
M = Mum

'P: When did you guys last see him?

M: That morning, on the 12th at Mum’s place

D: About 10.15am.'

M: No(?)

Read the full transcript here:

http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...full-transcript-from-william-tyrrells-parents

I don't know but I thought "you guys" is always said when the interviewed/questioned person is on the suspect side and it should be made a certain trust .....??

 

[Deleted member 102539]

The interviewer asked
When did you guys last see William.
Mum answered - That morning 12th September at Mums place.
Dad - about 10:15.
Mum - No.

Maybe Mum was saying No, meaning we did not see him at 10:15.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YJvNcJvhWU&feature=youtu.be

Dad's answer should have been: I saw him at x:xxh and my wife told me she saw him at x:xxh.

 

[Bohemian]

The police seem extremely sure the parents aren't involved and have ruled them out very early on. What they told police must have panned out in terms of alibi and corroborating evidence. Grandmas and the sisters evidence too. If there are inconsistencies perhaps it is due to the emotions and stress involved of that morning; and the mounting horror and absolute panic they must have felt when they could not find William. I'm thinking perhaps they are aware they will be looked at - think Patsy and John Ramsey......and also perhaps feel obscurely guilty a precious child in their care has been lost....

I don't think either of William's parents had anything to do with William's disappearance. I am keeping an open mind about every possibility though; without judgement. It's Strike Force Rosann and the NSW Court system that has responsibility to bring the perpetrator(s) to justice; not me. I'm just looking at all of the first person accounts around the time William went missing, to see what jumps out at me. For example; William's Mum said she noticed the white station wagon and grey sedan when she went out to the balcony, and again when she was playing with the children in the yard. I'd thought she'd only seen them once:

See Part 1 of the interview in my post:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-12-September-2014-23&p=12788301#post12788301

Now, I'm going to find the first mention of the grey-green sedan that came past and did a u-turn from the next-door neighbour's driveway, from either Mum herself or police. Print media seems to be very contradictory.

I've just spent too much time concentrating on BS et al and need to be more victim-focussed in William's case. If I have to start again from Day 1, so be it.

 

[sosocurious]

Dad's answer should have been: I saw him at x:xxh and my wife told me she saw him at x:xxh.

Yes that was what I was meaning FG. Maybe Mum was saying "No" you did not see him at 10:15. I did.