Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #24

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #821
it may not have been rw saying that but im pretty sure in early articles he was quoted and i remember wondering what he was doing when she went out and noting later on in interviews she always added that he was out then too, it all just felt a bit weird, but not implying anything, just moo
 
  • #822
it may not have been rw saying that but im pretty sure in early articles he was quoted and i remember wondering what he was doing when she went out and noting later on in interviews she always added that he was out then too, it all just felt a bit weird, but not implying anything, just moo

I agree, bearbear. We did all presume that he said that, way back in the threads. Because I remember wondering if he was still at home, too.
I think it became a little clearer later when Mrs Wilson started ensuring she said where he was (or where he wasn't ... which is home apparently, lol). I think he must clearly have been elsewhere, in a verifiable place ... maybe at work.
 
  • #823
Interesting the police check their house and cars three times. Considering he wasn't home. If he was a twork. Sure I read, that he was home. So he went out with her,or was at work?>?

No, Mrs Wilson said he was not at home.
“I wasn’t home and my husband wasn’t home. The only thing I was able to tell police was that I heard the children playing but didn’t see them … I just heard kids laughing and you could tell they were little children,” Mrs Wilson said.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...r/news-story/03fb14d003bfb73d3c193b5f6731f74c

Sorry, that post arrived in a refresh after I posted

I agree, bearbear. We did all presume that he said that, way back in the threads. Because I remember wondering if he was still at home, too.
I think it became a little clearer later when Mrs Wilson started ensuring she said where he was (or where he wasn't ... which is home apparently, lol). I think he must clearly have been elsewhere, in a verifiable place ... maybe at work.
 
  • #824
  • #825
The main house I was always concerned about on the street was the abandoned one. And I have always wondered if it was #35 Benaroon.
(#35 because of the appearance of the place in the 'for sale' pics, and the urgent sale commentary, and remember the strange clause in the 'for sale' notice? "We don't think this place has any encumbrances on it, but you probably should check.")


Local residents armed with torches spent the night searching for the boy.

"We've searched the drains on the road, but there was nothing there," said one woman who was with a group of friends.

The group then searched a nearby abandoned home after one of them heard noises.

"[A] neighbour used to live in this house but she's now in a nursing home so it's been abandoned for a while," she said.

"You know, anything's possible."

http://www.australianmissingpersonsregister.com/WilliamTyrell.htm
 
  • #826
A Benaroon Drive resident said his wife drove out of the street, which William's grandmother no longer lives in, one minute before William disappeared.

It was 26 or 28 minutes to 11am, he remembered with minute detail.

"She never saw a car or noticed anything strange," he said.

The man spent the next day with a pool net in hand searching through a dam and waterholes, anxious about what he might find.
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/william-t...-false-hope-12-months-on-20150903-gjenjz.html

Do we know which neighbour it was that was searching with his pool net?
 
  • #827
  • #828
I don't think so.
It sounds as if he didn't want his name published. imo

I remember reading another article about the neighbour who was using the pool net. Hoping one of the articles might give a little more detail, such as perhaps he was the same guy who was mowing his lawn or something that would signify who he was. In any case, most residents wouldn't have a pool net unless they had a pool?
 
  • #829
The main house I was always concerned about on the street was the abandoned one. And I have always wondered if it was #35 Benaroon.
(#35 because of the appearance of the place in the 'for sale' pics, and the urgent sale commentary, and remember the strange clause in the 'for sale' notice? "We don't think this place has any encumbrances on it, but you probably should check.")


Local residents armed with torches spent the night searching for the boy.

"We've searched the drains on the road, but there was nothing there," said one woman who was with a group of friends.

The group then searched a nearby abandoned home after one of them heard noises.

"[A] neighbour used to live in this house but she's now in a nursing home so it's been abandoned for a while," she said.

"You know, anything's possible."

http://www.australianmissingpersonsregister.com/WilliamTyrell.htm

To me, the one that sold 'urgently', was the very small house that appeared (from the photos from the real estate listings online) it was owned by a lone male.

If you look at the map which shows the 21 lots in that small community where FGM lived, it is interesting to note the locations of the 3 homes which sold afterward, in relation to FGM's house.

I had suspected, just imo, that the 'abandoned home', may have been the home on the 'other' side of FGM's house, the one in which it was said the people were 'away'.

There was something posted on WS just recently wherein one of the residents was talking about how the one fellow had moved away because he was sick of police questioning. (My rewording). I suspected that *that* home was the same one which appeared to be owned by the lone male which wanted the urgent sale. All moo.
 
  • #830
Interesting the police check their house and cars three times. Considering he wasn't home. If he was a twork. Sure I read, that he was home. So he went out with her,or was at work?>?



Sorry, that post arrived in a refresh after I posted

Just my opinion, but I got the impression that *everyone's* house (in that small community of 21 homes where FGM lived) was checked and rechecked, likely 3 times... whether or not people were said to have been home at the time. I didn't get the impression that police had chosen the W's next door to search more than the others.
 
  • #831
I am wondering if the reason why LE specified that WT's recovery would be part and parcel of collecting the $1,000,000 reward money is to add a safety guard so that people, perhaps with a vested interest in persecuting any particular person, cannot make accusations and concoct large stories/theories about what they may believe happened, without showing they actually know what happened/where he (or his remains) are held.
 
  • #832
To me, the one that sold 'urgently', was the very small house that appeared (from the photos from the real estate listings online) it was owned by a lone male.

If you look at the map which shows the 21 lots in that small community where FGM lived, it is interesting to note the locations of the 3 homes which sold afterward, in relation to FGM's house.

I had suspected, just imo, that the 'abandoned home', may have been the home on the 'other' side of FGM's house, the one in which it was said the people were 'away'.

There was something posted on WS just recently wherein one of the residents was talking about how the one fellow had moved away because he was sick of police questioning. (My rewording). I suspected that *that* home was the same one which appeared to be owned by the lone male which wanted the urgent sale. All moo.

Can anyone who remembers which house was 'abandoned' because the occupant(s) were 'away'; please confirm which one it was, please?

Before I go off on a tangent, The Turners(?) were away on a caravanning holiday(?); one elder (female neighbour) was in a nursing home(?); and the house next door to The Savages, where the 'loner' lived, was No. 35(?). Now, need :coffee: *zombie shuffle to kitchen*
 
  • #833
That's interesting...about 3 days ago on this thread I asked about success rates of reward offers...for your info the FF of Tiahleigh Palmer charged with her murder today in Logan Queensland. A $250,000 reward was offered back in May I think it was and I believe about 200 calls were received. Bio mother did an awareness campaign in July and FF car found in Sept and charges laid on him and another (with two others being questioned) today in Oct. Let's hope in four months' time we might hear an outcome about or for William...

The foster father was reportedly the last person to see Tiahleigh alive, though it is understood police never actually verified his version of events with witnesses on the day the 12-year-old went missing.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...r/news-story/8d8db5022544d53fbc12b80ed7b15e28

Means in case William ...? :thinking: :dunno:
 
  • #834
@South Aussie "had been grocery shopping and returned home minutes before William vanished. She saw nothing out of the ordinary when she drove into the street and pulled into her driveway" this refers to number 9 which is a long way down the road ("just metres away" is journalistic inaccuracy).
 
  • #835
Please can someone remind me of the source for the neighbours on uphill side being away on holiday?
 
  • #836
I remember reading another article about the neighbour who was using the pool net. Hoping one of the articles might give a little more detail, such as perhaps he was the same guy who was mowing his lawn or something that would signify who he was. In any case, most residents wouldn't have a pool net unless they had a pool?

It must've been Mr Wilson:

'A Benaroon Drive resident said his wife drove out of the street, which William's grandmother no longer lives in, one minute before William disappeared.

It was 26 or 28 minutes to 11am, he remembered with minute detail.

"She never saw a car or noticed anything strange," he said.

The man spent the next day with a pool net in hand searching through a dam and waterholes, anxious about what he might find.'

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/william-t...-false-hope-12-months-on-20150903-gjenjz.html

'LYING IN WAIT

THE person who abducted toddler William Tyrell may have laid in wait until the nearby houses were empty before striking, a neighbour believes.

Judy Wilson, whose property adjoins William’s grandmother’s backyard, believes it may be more than just coincidence that the child disappeared only after she went to run errands in town.

She said someone could have been waiting for her to leave, potentially aware that the neighbour on the other side was also away.

“If someone was watching the house, they would’ve seen me leave and would’ve known the other neighbour was away, she said.'

'Mrs Wilson also told how William’s father frantically searched her yard over and over again into the night.

“He was just walking around crying. He kept asking me if there was anywhere else he could’ve been hiding here,” Mrs Wilson said. “He just looked devastated.”

Mrs Wilson said she heard the two children playing in the neighbouring yard before she left to run errands in the township about 90 minutes before William disappeared, just metre’s from her home.'

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...l/news-story/46b94ee67cf7e7c2cb4ba6a276388da8
 
  • #837
Can anyone who remembers which house was 'abandoned' because the occupant(s) were 'away'; please confirm which one it was, please?

Before I go off on a tangent, The Turners(?) were away on a caravanning holiday(?); one elder (female neighbour) was in a nursing home(?); and the house next door to The Savages, where the 'loner' lived, was No. 35(?). Now, need :coffee: *zombie shuffle to kitchen*

Sorry, don't know where I got the name 'Turner' or that they 'were aeay on a caravanning holiday(?)' as neighbours in connection with William's FGM's former residence. Brain fart. Disregard. :doh:
 
  • #838
I figured as much, but it is surprising that if they stated they were not home, if they had alibi they were at work. Is there info other houses were searched 3 times?

They even did ceiling searches.

Just my opinion, but I got the impression that *everyone's* house (in that small community of 21 homes where FGM lived) was checked and rechecked, likely 3 times... whether or not people were said to have been home at the time. I didn't get the impression that police had chosen the W's next door to search more than the others.
 
  • #839
  • #840
@South Aussie "had been grocery shopping and returned home minutes before William vanished. She saw nothing out of the ordinary when she drove into the street and pulled into her driveway" this refers to number 9 which is a long way down the road ("just metres away" is journalistic inaccuracy).

Lydene Heslop:

'Another Benaroon Dr resident, Lydene Heslop, who lives further down the street, had been grocery shopping and returned home minutes before William vanished.

She saw nothing out of the ordinary when she drove into the street and pulled into her driveway.


She said she was unloading groceries from her car when William was snatched sometime after 10.30am, just metres away from her home where her youngest child was inside.

She said at 11.30am there was a knock on the door and it was Anne-Maree from up the road and William’s mother.

“I didn’t hear anything, so if the person who took him came down Benaroon Dr, they did it without panicking or driving fast or taking off like an idiot, because I would’ve heard,” Ms Heslop said.

“That’s pretty good luck. Especially at 10.30am on a Friday when there should only be one kid on the street, which is mine.”'

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...r/news-story/03fb14d003bfb73d3c193b5f6731f74c
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
121
Guests online
3,252
Total visitors
3,373

Forum statistics

Threads
632,622
Messages
18,629,205
Members
243,221
Latest member
twilliams48228
Back
Top