It is okay by me .... considering that the proof was all there many years ago - medical reports, police investigation, detailed accounts from the young girls - and it was decided not to prosecute to avoid putting the girls through that trauma. Now the girls are old enough to insist on the prosecution themselves, and testify themselves.
Nobody 'just accused' Spedding. Serious charges have been laid.
Police have been informed the offences … were not pursued formally by police at the time of disclosure due to concerns as to the welfare of the victims, given their tender age,” a fact sheet said.
http://www.news.com.au/national/cri...g/news-story/2a8a51819720492213582b8d70dc61da
If the proof was all there many years ago, there is not a chance they would have just let him go, 'to avoid putting the girls through that trauma'. Otherwise all perps of young children would be roaming our streets so none would have to be put through it. Please recall what the judge commented about those historical charges.
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/bill-sped...-over-child-sex-offences-20150618-ghry1m.htmlBill Spedding was granted bail for historical child sex offences on Friday after a court heard there was a possibility his alleged victims had been "coached" or "cajoled" into naming him as their attacker.
During Friday's bail application, NSW Supreme Court Justice Geoffrey Bellow said there were many "substantive issues" with the case against Mr Spedding.
"[There is a] real issue that either or both victims have been coached or cajoled into making the allegations that they make," Justice Bellow said.
"It is difficult to accept the Crown case is strong in circumstances where, as I have pointed out, that one of the victims has no recollection at all about the incident," Justice Bellow said.
Police have obtained statements from the two victims and obtained evidence that one victim at the time allegedly said: "Bill did it."
Justice Bellow said that, while the allegations were serious and there was medical evidence to support the victims' injury claims, there was still a question as to who attacked the girls.
....
"[The defence] highlighted there remained a real issue as to who was responsible," Justice Bellow said.
As part of the bail application, Mr Spedding's lawyers argued that his alleged victims had come into contact with Hillsley.
The court heard Mr Spedding had already been the subject of a police investigation for the same offences 28 years ago at which point a decision was made not to press charges.