Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #29

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,001
I found this article in reference to your question
(quote)


All humans constantly emit microscopic particles bearing human scent. By the millions, these particles become airborne and can be carried by the wind for considerable distances. Airborne scent is concentrated near its source, follows the air currents, and becomes more dilute the further it travels. An air scenting SAR dog is especially trained to locate the scent of any human in a specific area and close in on the source of the scent, and can do so from hundreds of metres away, in heavy bush or in the dark. SAR dogs are not restricted to following the missing person's track and can search long after the track is obliterated, zeroing in on where the person is now, regardless of how they got there.
http://www.vsrda.org/about-vsrda/using-air-scent-dogs

Cheers, Karinna. Thought it was like that. So probs a no-go that WT was taken to a neighboring property as the dogs would have zeroed in on it?
(I have more faith in dogs than humans most of the time!)
 
  • #1,002
I think the police dogs would have probably picked up his scent if this was the case?

Exactly right there, but we dont really know how it happened

Would there not be William' s DNA on the property anyway?

If the dogs are trained to be searching for flesh decomposing?

What are the police dogs trained for, scents?


We did heaps and heaps and heaps of research on the dogs while Gary Tweddle was missing (Blue Mountains). The dogs are not always successful. There are many factors that can distort their senses - moisture, wind, soil, other smells, other animals ... the list goes on and on.

The dogs missed Gary's scent. Late at night, he walked from a hotel, wandered down a road (the dogs lost his scent here), then wandered on foot all through the bush for about 1½ kms before he fell off a cliff. The dogs couldn't scent him at all in the bush. They searched for weeks for Gary.

.
 
  • #1,003
What is this creepy house over the road? A pic?
 
  • #1,004
What is this creepy house over the road? A pic?

Check out these links. Especially the pics in the google images link. The living room was creepy. TV set up for viewing on the floor, child's toy on the back of the couch. It just gave lots of us the creeps. Though it could just have been that the pics were taken while someone was moving out. Strange to take those kind of pics for a real estate ad though, and they were exactly the pics in the ad.

https://www.realestate.com.au/property/35-benaroon-dr-kendall-nsw-2439

Only the first 7 pics here, I think .. and the 4th pic is the view of grandma's house from outside 35 Benaroon Dr (creepy house)
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=...X&ved=0ahUKEwj6hbvj8YvZAhWGEpQKHUHSADgQsAQITw

.
 
  • #1,005
Cheers, Karinna. Thought it was like that. So probs a no-go that WT was taken to a neighboring property as the dogs would have zeroed in on it?
(I have more faith in dogs than humans most of the time!)

Yes i'm not sure exactly what dogs they used if more than one dog too?
They say the dogs are as good as their owners have trained them to be, and i know most of those dogs from the time they are puppies are very extensively trained for the job they are required to do from what i have read about them.
They can also be a very valuable asset for police investigations.
I also have more faith in dogs because as they say dogs have no reason to lie, and will do the best they can, IMO.
 
  • #1,006
Thanks for that SA.

I had to do a bit of work in a house that gave a few the creeps.

Didnt have any effect on me. I dont really think those pics are unusual though in saying that the 4th pic does stand out as
being a little different. It seems like an odd position.

What strikes me is the owl.
 
  • #1,007
Thanks for that SA.

I had to do a bit of work in a house that gave a few the creeps.

Didnt have any effect on me. I dont really think those pics are unusual though in saying that the 4th pic does stand out as
being a little different. It seems like an odd position.

What strikes me is the owl.

Here is the actual ad for 35 Benaroon Drive. It is sold now, but was up for sale when William went missing. We think it was supposed to be empty at that time.

The cars that were apparently parked on the street, windows down, on the morning that William went missing were parked virtually in front of this house ... 35 Benaroon Drive.

https://www.realestateview.com.au/r...sw/property-details-sold-residential-7856028/


The owl? A bit of black magic?

.
 
  • #1,008
How long was the house empty? Maybe nothing.


I only say about the owl as it was pointed right at the camera up front. As you said there was some unusual items present.
 
  • #1,009
‘Fri, [12 Sep 2014] 1.50pm: POLICE have established a mobile command outside the Kendall home of a missing three-year-old boy as the search for the toddler intensifies.

Emergency services in the area are scrambling to find the child, who was last seen about 10.30am on Friday in the front yard of his home in Benaroon Drive, Kendall.

He is described as having a Caucasian appearance, with dark hair and hazel eyes. He was last seen wearing a Spiderman costume.

More than 50 officers from the MNC Local Area Command, SES units from Port Macquarie, Wauchope and the Camden Haven, the Dog Squad and concerned residents have established a search grid in nearby scrub.

Police are grateful for offers of volunteer manpower but have asked the public to remain clear of the area so the search team can conduct a thorough sweep of the area.

PolAir is expected to arrive by 3pm.’

http://www.portnews.com.au/story/2555404/child-missing-at-kendall/?cs=257
SEPTEMBER 12 2014 - 12:00AM
 
  • #1,010
How long was the house empty? Maybe nothing.


I only say about the owl as it was pointed right at the camera up front. As you said there was some unusual items present.

Here is the sales history. No rental history at all.
There was some info about an elderly person who had gone into a retirement home or such, and the house was empty for a while. I always thought it was this house. But someone else thought it was a different house further down the street. I don't know why.

I also wondered if a squatter lived in this house at all, if it was officially empty. The house backs onto the forest.

28846rm.jpg

https://www.realestateview.com.au/property-360/property/35-benaroon-drive-kendall-nsw-2439/
 
  • #1,011
I thought i was just going to have a look here then Jill meagher, then karen R.

Thank you Boh. Never rest till justice.
 
  • #1,012
Thanks for that SA.

I had to do a bit of work in a house that gave a few the creeps.

Didnt have any effect on me. I dont really think those pics are unusual though in saying that the 4th pic does stand out as
being a little different. It seems like an odd position.

What strikes me is the owl.

Unit, what's your comment about 10 people from OS looking at the case mean ?
 
  • #1,013
Thankyou for posting that up. So in this William is age progressed to age 5 by that.
I guess just in case people are still looking for an alive William. If he is still alive which is dubious, but i guess it's possible somehow, even though statistics don't show that in missing/abducted very young child cases.

You’re welcome.

The first one was age progressed to five years
The second was done based on growth patterns between three & six years.
I guess there is always hope that that little man is out there alive.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #1,014
Have the authorities ever done an age progressed picture of WT? I think in 3 going on 4 years WT would have changed in his appearance. What is he this year? 7 years old?

No the auuthorities did not have age progression photos done, one newspaper commissiond one progression and I don't know who did the other.
 
  • #1,015
No the auuthorities did not have age progression photos done, one newspaper commissiond one progression and I don't know who did the other.

Thanks for clarifying frogwell. I have wondered if the age progressed photos of missing people/children would be accurate? The articles that are available to read on the internet vary, so who really knows i suppose?
 
  • #1,016
attachment.php




  • Authorities hope this image will help people still searching for him
‘A computerised image has been released of missing boy William Tyrrell and shines a light on what the youngster would look like today.

The remarkable picture was constructed by forensic anthropologist Dr Susan Hayes based on growth patterns for children, and more specifically, boys between the ages of three and six.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rrell-grown-New-image-shows-toddler-aged.html
10 Oct 2017
 

Attachments

  • 43B3D068-7C61-462B-8A81-26FC036138F4.jpeg
    43B3D068-7C61-462B-8A81-26FC036138F4.jpeg
    25.8 KB · Views: 68
  • #1,017
attachment.php




  • Authorities hope this image will help people still searching for him
‘A computerised image has been released of missing boy William Tyrrell and shines a light on what the youngster would look like today.

The remarkable picture was constructed by forensic anthropologist Dr Susan Hayes based on growth patterns for children, and more specifically, boys between the ages of three and six.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rrell-grown-New-image-shows-toddler-aged.html
10 Oct 2017


Yes and Jubes did say on the second anniversary they had engaged experts on that and the reality of the change from a child 3 to 5 is not that significant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIG-lcJMpVc

https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/37360768/what-missing-boy-william-tyrrell-would-look-like-now/
 
  • #1,018
Yes and Jubes did say on the second anniversary they had engaged experts on that and the reality of the change from a child 3 to 5 is not that significant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIG-lcJMpVc

https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/37360768/what-missing-boy-william-tyrrell-would-look-like-now/

And the photo embedded in the yahoo news article must’ve been released in October 2017, on the third anniversary of William’s disappearance. So it is his most recent likeness, constructed from a photograph of a living William and not human remains. You would think that it would be an excellent approximation of what he looks like now.
 
  • #1,019
Yes and Jubes did say on the second anniversary they had engaged experts on that and the reality of the change from a child 3 to 5 is not that significant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIG-lcJMpVc

https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/37360768/what-missing-boy-william-tyrrell-would-look-like-now/

Wouldn't that depend on the individual child though? Also the 5 yr. old age progressed picture is probably different at this point in time too because WT would be going on for 7 years old this year wouldn't he? And if his birthday was later on in the year when he went missing? he would be going on for 8 years old this year?
I guess they would never really know the accuracy of the age progressed picture unless they end up finding the child at around the same time of what the progressed picture looks like, IMO.
 
  • #1,020
And the photo embedded in the yahoo news article must’ve been released in October 2017, on the third anniversary of William’s disappearance. So it is his most recent likeness, constructed from a photograph of a living William and not human remains. You would think that it would be an excellent approximation of what he looks like now.

Yes the other was released in 2016 in the Sunday Telegraph.
William Tyrrell: Facial anthropologist Dr Susan Hayes creates image of ...
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/.../william-tyrrell-facial.../ec9629d818416bc6208d5...
Sep 10, 2016 -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
111
Guests online
2,450
Total visitors
2,561

Forum statistics

Threads
632,714
Messages
18,630,859
Members
243,272
Latest member
vynx
Back
Top