Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #33

[sosocurious]

Yes Possible, but 4 weeks - that's a LOT of resources to use when you consider the initial search was 10 days.

Absolutely agree sleep.
A lot of resources and a very long time later.
Something has sent them back to the location...what?

 

[Bohemian]

It is possible that the Coroner/Police Chief has said that every square centimetre of that area must be gone over before an inquest .... or before charging somebody based on circumstantial evidence, to dispel the defence that William wandered off.

BBM.

Hadn’t thought of this SA. Best case scenario is that they are getting ready to charge someone.

 

[they'll get you]

In a statement police said the four-week search was a change of tack from the original search.


“The initial search, while extensive, was focused only on finding William – a little boy who was lost – and not with a view of deliberate human intervention,” police said in a statement.

“William was not located, and the search did not uncover any evidence relevant to his disappearance.

William Tyrrell disappearance: police to search bushland

All these years later.

 

[they'll get you]

The perp of this crime can be assured that the police are moving in .... closer and closer .....

I bloody hope so SA.
I’m rattled with the talk of an inquest but many have been charged because of an inquest.

 

[Bohemian]

The word ‘forensic’ bothers me. It makes me think of clandestine burial.

 

[JLZ]

In a statement police said the four-week search was a change of tack from the original search.


“The initial search, while extensive, was focused only on finding William – a little boy who was lost – and not with a view of deliberate human intervention,” police said in a statement.

“William was not located, and the search did not uncover any evidence relevant to his disappearance.

William Tyrrell disappearance: police to search bushland

So, just a passing thought, and then I'll let it go right on past, any chance that "a change of tack" might mean they're ruling back in someone who'd been ruled out?

 

[they'll get you]

Yes, that’s the end goal. As for me, I’m not sure that I want to know, especially if William was harmed by someone.

Bo after this amount of time I doubt they’d be able to conclude that much.

 

[SouthAussie]

Absolutely agree sleep.
A lot of resources and a very long time later.
Something has sent them back to the location...what?

Yes, I can't see this being simply prep for an inquest. Have never heard of such a thing before.

They will be spending thousands and thousands of dollars. It must be something more than that.

 

[SouthAussie]

So, just a passing thought, and then I'll let it go right on past, any chance that "a change of tack" might mean they're ruling back in someone who'd been ruled out?

My mind immediately went to persons who lived on the street, walking the dog, mowing the lawn, living with their father .......

Or perhaps they have a tip about a well-known POI and their movements.

Hard to tell.

 

[they'll get you]

They were used earlier. The little pic I posted, with my first post about them, is them searching for William when he first went missing. Only they were not in charge of the search, at that point.

I would think with their ability to detect chemicals and other substances, they would have the equipment to detect forensically in this instance. The closest experts we have for this type of thing.

There won't be a heck of a lot left to detect, after almost 4 years.

Not searching in the same way, this time.

Could cadaver dogs be able to detect a shallow burial site?

 

[bearbear]

So, just a passing thought, and then I'll let it go right on past, any chance that "a change of tack" might mean they're ruling back in someone who'd been ruled out?

interesting, maybe, i dont think anyones ever entirely ruled out, maybe publicly they are but investigators are always waiting and watching listening for someone to slip up

 

[SouthAussie]

The word ‘forensic’ bothers me. It makes me think of clandestine burial.

I think they are trying to say something, without saying it.

 

[perfectingpink]

So, just a passing thought, and then I'll let it go right on past, any chance that "a change of tack" might mean they're ruling back in someone who'd been ruled out?

That is the question I have. Also, if William were buried, it would have to either be before he was reported missing or someone came back quite a bit of time later. Right?

 

[sleepinoz]

Yes, I can't see this being simply prep for an inquest. Have never heard of such a thing before.

They will be spending thousands and thousands of dollars. It must be something more than that.

Definitely something more, a 4 week search is huge.

I've never seen any LE agency state that they will search for 4 weeks. Huge amount of resources and money to put into something they're not sure they will find.

 

[JLZ]

Definitely something more, a 4 week search is huge.

I've never seen any LE agency state that they will search for 4 weeks. Huge amount of resources and money to put into something they're not sure they will find.

But on the other hand, 4 weeks would suggest that they don't know the exact location.

 

[they'll get you]

Absolutely agree sleep.
A lot of resources and a very long time later.
Something has sent them back to the location...what?

Well I’m hoping it’s something like Paul Onions who left vital information about Ivan Milan which was overlooked and overlooked even after his follow up calls.

Is it possible they’ve found some information that was shoved in the ‘for later stack’.

 

[JLZ]

That is the question I have. Also, if William were buried, it would have to either be before he was reported missing or someone came back quite a bit of time later. Right?

"Burial" under water would be quicker. It might even have been possible for one of the searchers to protect the site from discovery.

 

[sleepinoz]

"Burial" under water would be quicker. It might even have been possible for one of the searchers to protect the site from discovery.

Good Point JLZ.

I was thinking about the searchers when they stated "Police said the initial search around the rural township of Kendall was focused only on finding William — not with a view that there was deliberate human intervention".

Makes you wonder.

 

[they'll get you]

So, just a passing thought, and then I'll let it go right on past, any chance that "a change of tack" might mean they're ruling back in someone who'd been ruled out?

OK could it be like the covert investigation with Daniel Morcombe? The perp has been under surveillance, information gathered and now finding the rest for conviction.
That Cowan took them to where Daniel was, maybe Spedding & Co. is that more rat smart.

 

[they'll get you]

I think they are trying to say something, without saying it.

Jubelin will be conducting the police update tomorrow so maybe more will be said. What time? Dunno.

He’s good how he says a lot without saying too much IYKWIM.