Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #37

[Thebottomline]

It got WT'S face and awareness out there via their campaign and that's all that matters...no different for him to be a poster boy for Bravehearts JMO

With all due respect, I don’t think “they” got Williams face out there.

 

[purpleandgreen]

Talk about personal agandas. I’m sad that WS has come to this. WS is so different from social media. That’s why I chose WS.

 

[SouthAussie]

Talk about personal agandas. I’m sad that WS has come to this. WS is so different from social media. That’s why I chose WS.

It hasn't come to this, P&G. Just rolling and scrolling, and carrying on.

We have been here for almost 4 years now. We'll show up on this thread until this matter is resolved.

 

[purpleandgreen]

I have my opinion and you have yours and I respect that.

Yes WT was being cared for in a loving home, by loving fp's.

He may have had lovely visitations with bio parents as well.

WT's status of care may not have had any play in his disappearance either, but it certainly doesn't give people the right to belittle Bio's over and over on this thread either.

I take offence you saying that my conversation has no place here. Isn't this thread about WT?? WT was in care, he is missing, we are talking about the inquest, so why can't I have my opinion on that process just like you.

If WT's care status doesn't belong here, then why does KT's recent court appearances or BC's belong here?? They had no bearing on WT going missing but they were still talked about and belittled in every way possible on this thread

Could you please provide links to where they were belittled?

Her court appearances etc were discussed because thanks to Allan Pearl Smith her details were made public and published in MSM. Hence under WS TOS it’s open for discussion.

 

[purpleandgreen]

It hasn't come to this, P&G. Just rolling and scrolling, and carrying on.

We have been here for almost 4 years now. We'll show up on this thread until this matter is resolved.

Yes we will, SA. Despite the attempts at diversions. This is William’s thread. Personal grievances with government departments should be aired elsewhere.

You will get justice William. GJ is close, IMO.

 

[Thebottomline]

I don’t think the biological parents have been belittled here. Msm were the ones to report on their previous discrepancies with the law. Hence the statements some have made here about AP doing more damage than good.

 

[CuriousCritter]

Could you please provide links to where they were belittled?

Her court appearances etc were discussed because thanks to Allan Pearl Smith her details were made public and published in MSM. Hence under WS TOS it’s open for discussion.

Yeah in the many 37 threads for WT, BIO'S have been cleared as stated by JUBES over and over. So her court appearance's have no bearing on WT's disappearance

 

[frogwell]

If posters feel the need to comment to each other personally, maybe they can PM each other as it looks like a sideways attempt to put down other posters views and is rude, IMO

We have different opinions on this thread and we write MOO or IMO to indicate that. Why is there the regular reminder to posters on this forum about, other motives, ignoring distractions, how many years a bunch of you have been on here who are going to back up no matter what? I am finding these statements very provocative. IMO

 

[SouthAussie]

Yeah in the many 37 threads for WT, BIO'S have been cleared as stated by JUBES over and over. So her court appearance's have no bearing on WT's disappearance

Unfortunately, there may have been a pattern of behaviour with regard to offences against the police, about attitudes towards authorities that removed William from Karlie's care.
A removal that eventually led to William being on Benaroon Drive in Kendall on that fateful day.
It is a causational link that goes back to when William was a baby. When he was removed from an ongoing at-risk situation.

Nobody here is blaming any of the parents for William's disappearance, but a pattern of behaviour (discussed previously and inclusive of old published offences) that led to William's removal was the first step leading to this terrible event.

Many people here have great empathy for Karlie. She has had a tough life, some maybe self inflicted, some maybe not. I hope things are much better now for her remaining children.

Karlie is considered a victim here. I believe that we have learned to honour that position.
Discussing victim behavior, good or bad is fine, but do so in a civil and constructive way, and only when such behavior is relevant to the case.
Rules - Etiquette & Information

 

[purpleandgreen]

If posters feel the need to comment to each other personally, maybe they can PM each other as it looks like a sideways attempt to put down other posters views and is rude, IMO

Yes it is. Very rude. Easy mistake to make when you’re a new poster. I don’t have social media so I’m used to adhering to the rules of WS. So perhaps that could be the difference. IMOO.

I’m all about William. Nothing more, nothing less. I’m certainly not about personal agendas and politics. I have none. Just justice for William.

 

[SouthAussie]

If posters feel the need to comment to each other personally, maybe they can PM each other as it looks like a sideways attempt to put down other posters views and is rude, IMO

We have different opinions on this thread and we write MOO or IMO to indicate that. Why is there the regular reminder to posters on this forum about, other motives, ignoring distractions, how many years a bunch of you have been on here who are going to back up no matter what? I am finding these statements very provocative. IMO

I think we are all aware of the report button.
The differences quietened down pretty quickly. All opinions are standing.
And all new members are welcome here. I guess we all learn that debate isn't all peaches and cream, at times.

 

[frogwell]

Yes it is. Very rude. Easy mistake to make when you’re a new poster. I don’t have social media so I’m used to adhering to the rules of WS. So perhaps that could be the difference. IMOO.

I’m all about William. Nothing more, nothing less. I’m certainly not about personal agendas and politics. I have none. Just justice for William.

From what I have observed of your posts, I strongly disagree with these statements. IMO

 

[frogwell]

I think we are all aware of the report button.
The differences quietened down pretty quickly. All opinions are standing.
And all new members are welcome here. I guess we all learn that debate isn't all peaches and cream, at times.

I'm certainly aware of it and using it. I don't think the mod has had time to check as yet, and I'm happy for mine to be wiped for addressing things personally. IMO

 

[Thebottomline]

Sorry , I hope I as a new member have not said anything to cause offence.

 

[SouthAussie]

Sorry , I hope I as a new member have not said anything to cause offence.

No, no-one really has. I edited my previous post a while ago, because I realised I wasn't offended.

Just going to watch how I respond to newer members ... not be so blunt.

My apologies for offending CC.

 

[CuriousCritter]

From what I have observed of your posts, I strongly disagree with these statements. IMO

Don't get yourself banned or timed out, because of the disagreements. I get the gist of this thread and if you haven't been here from thread 1 your not welcome or will be shot down by those rude well known members.

 

[purpleandgreen]

Sorry , I hope I as a new member have not said anything to cause offence.

Most definitely not, bl. Like most of us you have William at heart. This is his thread and anything else is extraneous. IMO.

 

[butterstick]

And surely you mean the footprints entering and leaving the yard of a particular house in Benaroon Drive, from where William disappeared.

Yeah I mean the address in general.

 

[butterstick]

As quite a few of us have agreed many times, it is evident that the police 'know' what has happened to William

What's the evidence?

 

[purpleandgreen]

What's the evidence?

Just as a matter of interest, on the other hand, why do you think that they don’t know, even though they might still be making their evidence watertight, just as in Karen’s case?