Thanks,guess some women will stand by their man no matter what.No, I don't but I suspect not, especially since BS was up on historical sex charges. I think she'd have to live separately from BS to even get a toe in the door. IMO
Thanks,guess some women will stand by their man no matter what.No, I don't but I suspect not, especially since BS was up on historical sex charges. I think she'd have to live separately from BS to even get a toe in the door. IMO
In your opinion.
No, I don't but I suspect not, especially since BS was up on historical sex charges. I think she'd have to live separately from BS to even get a toe in the door. IMO
Well hang on, let's analyse this. If they went for coffee AFTER the 11.30 am assembly, then that still leaves 10.30 - 11.30 wide open. Assuming they went to the assembly, and assuming they went for coffee, which we're still waiting to be validated by a proper source eg police or impartial witness.
Well hang on, let's analyse this. If they went for coffee AFTER the 11.30 am assembly, then that still leaves 10.30 - 11.30 wide open. Assuming they went to the assembly, and assuming they went for coffee, which we're still waiting to be validated by a proper source eg police or impartial witness.
The fact they went for coffee AFTER the assembly is in a newspaper article linked already a couple of days ago.
Social media mostly isn't allowed in WS, I thought? Doesn't bother me either way as I don't have it. Way too many trolls from what I've read.
And, But, he does have to provide an alibi to police and the courts. And we ARE allowed to discuss it as he the main POI as has been pointed out and linked above.
Do you have a theory about what happened to William?
Walk a mile in their shoes.Thanks,guess some women will stand by their man no matter what.
Yes. He disappeared thru human intervention.
DeletedThe fact they went for coffee AFTER the assembly is in a newspaper article linked already a couple of days ago.
In the article I linked on the previous page it says walked across the road to school assembley, so it seems coffee in their own words was before handThe fact they went for coffee AFTER the assembly is in a newspaper article linked already a couple of days ago.
Here is the article againBut didn’t he or Col say coffee was before assembly ? Wasn’t coffee at 10 am and assembly after? Regardless alibi is only strong if someone can actually vouch for him being there which at this stage it seems no one besides MS canWe’re for Sydney | Daily Telegraph
And yet another one https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw...f-toddler-william-tyrell-20150123-12wpef.htmlHere is the article again
No Thanks.Walk a mile in their shoes.
He was charged with historical sex charges with minors.Alleged historical sex charges
The assembly was at 9am due to the jump rope for heart event scheduled for about midday. All these details are in links provided previously.
The 9am assembly is in schools calendar.
Which ties in with the coffee Beforehand around 10amRe
With all due respect, rereadthe post. It was postponed until 11.30. Imo
But no one can verify that THEY, as in BS was there, as yet. As has been pointed out countless times. Or do you have a source that you haven’t linked? He said, she said, they said, doesn’t cut it for verification. Imo, and I’m sure in the opinion of LE too.imo.The fact they went for coffee AFTER the assembly is in a newspaper article linked already a couple of days ago.
Yes, I’d LOVE to know why he made statements like he did.Just cos social media discussion is disallowed doesn't mean contributors here cannot take what was being said with regard to timeline of police investigations, when the spedding alleged link was 1st raised, what media were reporting and spedding media appearances. To understand what would have prompted him to answer questions like he did and to make statements like he did.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.