Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #40

[iailwa]

maybe the unknown person who police will be watching closely isnt really unknown, just someone who has never been mentioned or thought of as a poi or suspect?
could be anyone currently there or in august

yep true

 

[JLZ]

Huh? Are you saying it could be PS. It's my thoughts too - but then with regards to recent media - i get confused! Maybe we don't know someone via media? No idea!

If the inquest is going to focus on a new POI (and it isn't Savage), why doesn't the person have a lawyer present? As far as I can see all four lawyers are accounted for by BS, PS, the foster family and FACS. It was a big surprise when we realized that PS was in there with BS; and although he was storied, it wasn't as a POI. We got slapped down here at WS for having too much to say about him, or making suspicious insinuations or something. (Edit: I think the media drew an inference from the directions hearing like some of us did, but they couldn't quite say it for legal reasons.)

 

[Bohemian]

I found something - of no repute

"The inquest into William Tyrrell’s disappearance, due to begin today, will reportedly focus on a new person of interest who has never been discussed publicly before."

From -New person of interest expected to take centre stage at William Tyrrell inquest

There were many articles that day, saying the same thing. What i don't get is - PS has been discussed, not just here, but all over the news a couple of months back...? wasn't he??? I don't really get it (;ike usual)

Savage has been discussed but not as a POI by MSM or police.

 

[iailwa]

If the inquest is going to focus on a new POI (and it isn't Savage), why doesn't the person have a lawyer present? As far as I can see all four lawyers are accounted for by BS, PS, the foster family and FACS. It was a big surprise when we realized that PS was in there with BS; and although he was storied, it wasn't as a POI. We got slapped down here at WS for having too much to say about him, or making suspicious insinuations or something.

Maybe this person doesn't have a lawyer present because they are not required until august? I just find it strange... IMO

 

[iailwa]

Savage has been discussed but not as a POI by MSM or police.

They are just getting started - with witnesses. I'm curious to see what follows that's for sure... not all of the witnesses are represented i imagine? anyway i don't know what we are ta;king about - all i'm stating is - maybe there is someone who hasn't been discussed? (PS was all over the media months back). I do worry about him though !!

 

[JLZ]

Maybe this person doesn't have a lawyer present because they are not required until august? I just find it strange... IMO

Well, you saw earlier BS's lawyer get up and question FM. I think if someone needs representation, it's for the whole proceedings, to challenge false statements or implications or omissions that could be detrimental to the client. Not just for the days the person is giving evidence. Especially if the expectation is that the inquest is going to focus on them as a POI.

 

[iailwa]

Well, you saw earlier BS's lawyer get up and question FM. I think if someone needs representation, it's for the whole proceedings, to challenge false statements or implications or omissions that could be detrimental to the client. Not just for the days the person is giving evidence. Especially if the expectation that the inquest is going to focus on them as a POI.

yes true - but if there is a suspect that is not a witness, well... he might not be represented yet, is all - everyone's seems to be going gaga. but it's true - it could be no-one we have heard of, couldn't it? I suspected PS for sure, but he's def been discussed by media. Maybe it's him - but maybe not? i am concerned about he recent articles about an unknown - when he has been discussed/ it just worries me!

 

[iailwa]

Well, you saw earlier BS's lawyer get up and question FM. I think if someone needs representation, it's for the whole proceedings, to challenge false statements or implications or omissions that could be detrimental to the client. Not just for the days the person is giving evidence. Especially if the expectation is that the inquest is going to focus on them as a POI.

yeah maybe

 

[bearbear]

this person may not be aware they are being watched, and police dont want them alerted to their suspicions? maybe therell be a police body language analyst in the crowd, the person may not need legal reps yet and police are hoping they slip up?

 

[Bohemian]

yes true - but if there is a suspect that is not a witness, well... he might not be represented yet, is all - everyone's seems to be going gaga. but it's true - it could be no-one we have heard of, couldn't it? I suspected PS for sure, but he's def been discussed by media. Maybe it's him - but maybe not? i am concerned about he recent articles about an unknown - when he has been discussed/ it just worries me!

I don’t think I’m making myself understood. Savage hasn’t been discussed as a POI.

 

[iailwa]

I don’t think I’m making myself understood. Savage hasn’t been discussed as a POI.

True. So we should not discuss. he is obiously a witness. I am really discussing someone else, & i don't even know who lol

There's a possibility none of us do!

sorry not a laughing matter...

 

[JLZ]

True. So we should not discuss. he is obiously a witness. I am really discussing someone else, & i don't even know who lol

There's a possibility none of us do!

sorry not a laughing matter...

Take a break, go get a coffee or pick someone up from the airport. Bo wasn't saying we shouldn't talk about PS.

 

[iailwa]

Take a break, go get a coffee or pick someone up from the airport. Bo wasn't saying we shouldn't talk about PS.

But we are not meant to discuss him he's not a POI. I don't need a break JLZ. I just need clarification - someone police have never discussed before - hmmm. I will take a break tho - perhaps you're right about that, but why the comment about picking up someone from the airport? A little off hand? GFU

Get further understood*

 

[Bohemian]

True. So we should not discuss. he is obiously a witness. I am really discussing someone else, & i don't even know who lol

There's a possibility none of us do!

sorry not a laughing matter...

All we really know is that Savage is an ‘interested person’ and, as such, is able to be represented legally at William’s inquest because there is a risk that adverse comment will be made against him during proceedings (as far as I understand it and have posted previously). He has been mentioned in the media because he was granted leave to appear but he hasn’t been one of the previously named or discussed POIs. If he is, that will make him a new POI.

 

[iailwa]

All we really know is that Savage is an ‘interested person’ and, as such, is able to be represented legally at William’s inquest because there is a risk that adverse comment will be made against him during proceedings (as far as I understand it and have posted previously). He has been mentioned in the media because he was granted leave to appear but he hasn’t been one of the previously named or discussed POIs. If he is, that will make him a new POI.

But not someone that hasn't been discussed?

 

[iailwa]

Ok see you all tomoz... I'm so sorry i think there might be another suspect. I mean, how indignant of me! lol. night everyone! <3

 

[Bohemian]

But not someone that hasn't been discussed?

No, he hasn’t been discussed as a POI.

(In other words, I don’t think the new POI MSM is talking about is someone we haven’t heard about before at all. Just that we haven’t heard about them being a POI, either from police or in MSM.)

 

[JLZ]

But we are not meant to discuss him he's not a POI. I don't need a break JLZ. I just need clarification - someone police have never discussed before - hmmm. I will take a break tho - perhaps you're right about that, but why the comment about picking up someone from the airport? A little off hand? GFU

Sorry, just thought you needed a brain refresh, as we all do at times, and the airport worked for FM--a little inappropriate levity there. Yes, in some articles the media appear to be saying there is someone totally new. Perhaps there is. I don't know what's going to happen--I'm on the edge of my seat. I am inclined to think that what the media said about a virgin personality is not quite true; that they are alluding to PS, who has had media exposure as a neighbour and as a witness, but not as a POI.

 

[iailwa]

No, he hasn’t been discussed as a POI.

(In other words, I don’t think the new POI MSM is talking about is someone we haven’t heard about before at all. Just that we haven’t heard about them being a POI.)

Well I took it to mean it was someone that has not been discussed... just like the reliable MSN reported. I am truly going now peeps! No doubt i will be 6 pages behind in the morn but i have to make dinner anyway

 

[iailwa]

Sorry, just thought you needed a brain refresh, as we all do at times, and the airport worked for FM--a little inappropriate levity there. Yes, in some articles the media appear to be saying there is someone totally new. Perhaps there is. I don't know what's going to happen--I'm on the edge of my seat. I am inclined to think that what the media said about a virgin personality is not quite true; that they are alluding to PS, who has had media exposure as a neighbour and as a witness, but not as a POI.

yes, thank you Jlz.. we don't know yet - very elusive... & yes could be PS but who knows? I said i was going but DS & DH aren't due home for another hour so bare with me everyone. Where is PT. I feel outnumbered...! lol.

Guys i may seem like a FW (frequesnt wouser) sometimes. but seriously, all i care about is william. and then some