- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 33,209
- Reaction score
- 217,709
Thank goodness.
Jubes esteemed character witnesses all seemed to disagree with the magistrate's opinions (while respecting the judgement of the court, of course

Excellent.
Thanks SlouthNo worries ... if there are any further tweets can you guys please post them .... I'm "over and out" for the afternoon as I have an appointment .....
I was starting to worry the Magistrate would never get to the end.....
Thanks xx
That's it in a nutshell, SA.I remember Mark Tedeschi from the Simon Gittany trial ... seemed like quite a powerhouse of a lawyer.
...........
"Mr Tedeschi told the court he attempted to dissuade Jubelin from resigning.
"I would categorise Gary Jubelin as one of the best [officers] that I've come across in terms of his application, his professionalism, his attitude, his dedication and his integrity," he said.
...........
Jubelin considered Mr Savage's behaviour "irrational" and he had no alibi for a crucial window of time on the morning William vanished in September 2014.
While warrants allowed Mr Savage's home, car and phone to be bugged, Jubelin's 2017 and 2018 recordings weren't made on approved listening devices, which produced poor-quality audio and suffered basic failures such as flat batteries."
Tyrrell detective sentenced over illegal recordings of person of interest
Can we all just make sure we buy his book as a show of support
Any date on that book's release?
We could always support him if he ever takes up pro boxing.
If I may, I believe this is the type of thing that our member 'Cleaver' may have been referring to. With Jubelin's experience of some 34 years, he more than perhaps anyone, should know how things work as far as police work and its ultimate inclusion in a future trial to help convict any perp. I would think other officers involved would be much more insulted that one of their own would take such risks and especially in such an important, expensive, and long-running case. imo.:Hi Cleaver & thanks for your apparent learned input at this time. We’ve missed you.
I did underline as above as I’d like to understand more of what you mean by that sentence.
I’m also not endorsing your insinuation that any evidence that Jubelin may have collected is useless.
I also suggest members of our investigative forces may be insulted by that comment, since all such evidence would be at their disposal, for their own investigations to follow.
......
Deug and Cleaver you both raise good points...... and definitely Cleavers earlier statement in the thread was backed up by the Judge himself in sentencing as above....If I may, I believe this is the type of thing that our member 'Cleaver' may have been referring to. With Jubelin's experience of some 34 years, he more than perhaps anyone, should know how things work as far as police work and its ultimate inclusion in a future trial to help convict any perp. I would think other officers involved would be much more insulted that one of their own would take such risks and especially in such an important, expensive, and long-running case. imo.:
But Mr Hudson said Jubelin's illegal recordings could have possibly led to a case against William's killer being thrown out of court or being unable to be prosecuted, as it was obtained illegally.
Gary Jubelin: Downfall of William Tyrrell detective in scathing court judgment | Daily Mail Online
----
Jamie McKinnell@jamie86·4h
Magistrate Ross Hudson sentencing Jubelin now. He says the offending "strikes across the heart, extent, nature and purpose of the Surveillance Devices Act" and the "tentacles in terms of the ramifications of illegal recordings" need to be noted, for example future case dismissed.
Jamie McKinnell on Twitter
----
Lia Harris@LiaJHarris·4h
Magistrate Hudson told the court the Tyrrell case was “such an important investigation” and that “places a very high bar... just in case there is evidence available... that it is obtained legally... that it is admissible”.
Lia Harris on Twitter
----
Fallen cop Gary Jubelin says he has woken up as a 'convicted criminal', something he never imagined happening in his 34 years as a police officer.
A day after he was convicted of illegally recording a person of interest in the William Tyrrell case and fined $10,000, Jubelin spoke to radio host Alan Jones on Thursday about his downfall.
'I've woken up this morning a convicted criminal, not a situation I thought I'd ever find myself in,' he told Jones on 2GB radio.
'It's my reputation that's taken the biggest hit, and my integrity, and that's what has upset me more than anything.'
Gary Jubelin breaks his silence after conviction for illegal recording in William Tyrrell case | Daily Mail Online
Ambition, politics and tall poppies. IMO.I've been a police officer for 34 years, I haven't seen other people treated the same way I had been treated.
'I wasn't even allowed to go back into my office to get my personal belongings.'
Why? What was it about this case? Don't tell me that recording on mobile phones does not happen all the time (and not just in the police force either).
Yes, I believe so, even if it's a form of note taking and erasing it later. While one officer working in team Rosann decided or was advised by another to download the recording for safe keeping, that officer is currently sitting in his 'dream job', his words.I've been a police officer for 34 years, I haven't seen other people treated the same way I had been treated.
'I wasn't even allowed to go back into my office to get my personal belongings.'
Why? What was it about this case? Don't tell me that recording on mobile phones does not happen all the time (and not just in the police force either).
Jubes was after the wrong guy? Who is the right guy? From what I have read, there is no evidence/forensics/anything directly pointing to anyone's guilt.
I wonder what 'reasonable grounds' were given for the warrant(s) to surveil Savage.
I think he definitely is writing a book .....Relieved to hear Gary has a fine and no jail sentence. $10,000 I hope he can afford to pay. It's not too bad at $2,500 per recording. Maybe his job with the Telegraph (?) will help, & is he truly writing a book? I hope so. Is he allowed to profit though, if he's committed a crime? Maybe if it's about his other investigations he could profit?
I think he definitely is writing a book .....
GARY JUBELIN TO PUBLISH MEMOIR WITH HARPERCOLLINS – The Fordham Company
I have no idea about the profit part regarding being convicted of a crime .... ??? Would have to look up that legislation...But a very interesting point that you raise .....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.