• #861
another detective in violent crime homicide unit,
 
  • #862
so trial should start back again today, I will watch it live then go back and watch the days I have missed,
 
  • #863
even in 2015 they were looking to see who if anybody connected to AF WIFI on the night of her murder, Alex not hitting her WIFI that night, never mentioned anybody else connecting, so maybe defendant left phone in car
 
  • #864
James Catsamaledis sp the pharmacist computer or phone activity was not looked at by him, reading around the case the defense was going to have someone else being there SODDI, before they decided to go with the pharmacist as her killer, this was discussed in pre trial hearings when the judge said they could use the SODDI defense using the pharmacist as the killer and other witnesses could testify things about the pharmacist in relation to case, the pharmacist was in court at a hearing with his atty and pled the 5th, the defense wanted the pharmacist to be made to get on witness stand and plead 5th then, judge denied this
 
  • #865
AF and Alex phone records collected, LE was building timeline of AF and Alex on the day pre the murder, plus who she was in contact with, and when she stopped using phone, plus who the people in her phone were, looking at Alex phone day before murder up to when he found AF, Charles Hunt mentioned, he is Alex roommate
 
  • #866
she mapped AF, Alex and roommate phones for the day before till body found by Alex, AF,
 
  • #867
anybody know what time the trial starts when it is live
 
  • #868
LE were so thorough in this case, they searched very hard to try to find connections IM may have had with AF in or before 2015, they found ex girlfriend who lived in neighborhood but that was from 2017, and checke4d his brothers and there cars to see if they had connection to AF neighborhood and that would be the tie to how IM came to choose AF home, but there was no connection to AF home from his two brothers,

his cell phone didn't help as records only went back to 2017 and AF murdered in 2015,
 
  • #869
anybody know what time the trial starts when it is live

10:30am Arizona time - 10 hears behind me - it is 8:25pm my time - right now in Arizona 10:25am. So it starts in 5 minutes.

edited to add - same as Pacific Time for Arizona
 
  • #870
10:30am Arizona time - 10 hears behind me - it is 8:25pm my time - right now in Arizona 10:25am. So it starts in 5 minutes.

edited to add - same as Pacific Time for Arizona
thanks so much, I will have a look for a live link, I don't want one with talking heads plus I have an aversion to Fox so will look for a different one
 
  • #871
I can't find a live link just old footage
 
  • #872
I can't find a live link just old footage

I'm surprised you found ANY coverage of this trial. Darn - I was going to have you give me the witness names, etc. for today's hearing. Oh well!
 
  • #873
I'm surprised you found ANY coverage of this trial. Darn - I was going to have you give me the witness names, etc. for today's hearing. Oh well!
lol, their is loads of footage of most of the proceedings but not a live link for today I will go back to day 16 is where I am up to

I have watched videos of her parents and it is heartbreaking, she was so loved, such a tragedy, and LE illegally using his blood sample has meant they have been fighting for years to get to trial
 
  • #874
HURRY, HELP US MEET OUR GOAL FOR MARCH. WE ONLY NEED 14 MORE PEOPLE
Don't you hate those soul-sucking ads you see on other websites? You don't see them on Websleuths. Let's keep it that way.
Help keep Websleuths completely ad-free by
becoming a Guardian for just $3 a month.

You’ll unlock exclusive perks AND help protect the one thing we all love—an ad-free, drama-free place to focus on the cases that matter.

Three bucks. That’s it.
CLICK HERE and become a Guardian today and keep Websleuths the way it should be.
 
  • #875
The pharmacist who the defense is arguing is the murderer gave 2 buccal swabs, and 2 different analysts tested the buccal swabs independently of each other and both excluded him as being the contributor to the PMH sample from the crime scene, the unknown male(PMH is a mixed profile, the DNA mixture was only on one loci so a tiny bit of DNA was recorded that was different to the other profile in the mix)
all buccal swabs were tested to see if they were a match to PMH, any male it seems who they came into contact with during the investigation, when the pharmacist DNA was tested LE nor the lab knew who the PMH swab from crime scene belonged too, it was only when they found a match to the defendant in April 2018
,
the analyst wrote her report on the match from PMH crime scene to IM blood vials from his prior DUI blood draw on April 6 2018 very difficult for the defense to climb that mountain (the buccal swab testing was done from 2015 up to 2018, when they got the hit on the defendant,)

the defendant is the only contributor to the sample they have matched to PMH, but boy did they have to do some testing before they got to him
 
Last edited:
  • #876
The lab that processed the DNA only found unknown male DNA on the swab PHA, at that time the lab was using the "binary" traditional method of DNA testing according to analyst, but they changed to a new method STARMIX, they changed after IM the defendant had been matched to the PHA sample. analyst said they didn't change to the new method because they now had a match to IM. but it is a bit fishy when many of the items tested under the old method did not reveal the presence of IM, but the new method did,

so now the DNA found in her home that can be contributed to IM (some items are partial DNA results, some mixtures, and the statistical probabilities are different) are on the beer bottle state argues he assaulted her with he is part of a mix with AF and AS (her boyfriend) I am not sure if he was on the cap end or the broken bottom end, as it is very difficult to follow all the details, but some of his DNA is on that bottle, and there was some of his DNA on the arcadia sliding door, I may have missed some of her testimony as it was a lot, but his DNA was in at least 3 places in her home, a home he says he never went in, and he says he never knew AF,

I bet the analyst is not looking forward to cross

And the pharmacist must be feeling a bit better today, as his DNA was not found in the home, and the defendants was found in at least 3 places, places where it was to be expected, ie somebody had to touch the beer bottles to break them, and somebody was attacking AF both inside and outside her home and the arcadia door was where they exited the home as she was obviously fighting for her life and trying to get away,
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
164
Guests online
645
Total visitors
809

Forum statistics

Threads
645,559
Messages
18,842,694
Members
245,718
Latest member
windellsavage
Top