GUILTY AZ - Daniel Rodriguez, 29, fatally shot by Phoenix PD officer, 5 Oct 2010 #3

[geevee]

Hey Geevee! I don't think any way he will get another trial on assault. That is just a motion all defense's probably put it just in case some miracle happens and the judge decides to grant it. Like Jodi's lawyers and all their motions to dismiss the whole trial over some little thing, or motions to get removed from the case when they knew that wouldn't happen. There was no issue in this trial, everything was presented fairly and the jury convicted, so IMO there is nothing the judge can do.

Hiya aa :seeya:

I figured it must be a long shot, hope we get to see the argument and ruling. And sentencing next Friday.

 

[aa9511]

aa I read that thread and dont bother commenting,reminds me of the jbr threads and treyvons,probably not as much snark but I still refuse to comment lol.

She is guilty as sin. Another arias,although she is not as cruel I suppose.

That trial I was talking about is about a girl who stabbed her mum like 50 times. Her lack of remorse reminds me of the she devil as well.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4

Hey Josie, yes I should really try to stay out of it but I can't help myself! By the way, who is jbr?

 

[aa9511]

Hiya aa :seeya:

I figured it must be a long shot, hope we get to see the argument and ruling. And sentencing next Friday.

Yes, hopefully the hearing and sentencing will be live!! Please, please, please.

That reminds me that Michael Bargo's sentecing was supposed to be today, I think I missed it.

 

[Jewels53]

Court date: 10/18/2013 @ 8:30 Case #: CR2010-153913

Case event: Status/Sentencing Camera ruling: Pool Camera Approved

Judge: Warren Granville Prosecutor: Juan Martinez

Defendant: Richard Chrisman Defense attorney: Craig Mehrens

Case notes: Phoenix police officer charged with 2nd degree murder, aggravated assault and cruelty to animals (misd.) He allegedly used excessive force by shooting a man and his dog while responding to a criminal damage incident. A jury found him guilty of aggravated assault. They were hung on the counts of animal cruelty and second degree murder.

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/MediaRelationsDepartment/HighProfileList/hplSelectItem.asp

This says there will be a Pool Camera, so I don't know if this is going to be streamed live or not?

 

[geevee]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/MediaRelationsDepartment/HighProfileList/hplSelectItem.asp

This says there will be a Pool Camera, so I don't know if this is going to be streamed live or not?

Hiya Jewels! :seeya:

Thanks for finding that, I sure hope it means we'll get live streaming but at least I would think video for later if not.

 

[aa9511]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/MediaRelationsDepartment/HighProfileList/hplSelectItem.asp

This says there will be a Pool Camera, so I don't know if this is going to be streamed live or not?

Woohoo!! I think what they are saying is that the camera is approved, but then it is up to whatever media outlet has it, to actually stream it or just ignore the whole thing?

 

[Jewels53]

Hiya Jewels! :seeya:

Thanks for finding that, I sure hope it means we'll get live streaming but at least I would think video for later if not.

Hi :seeya: back at you and aa!

I miss all of you!

I sure hope we get to see RC sentenced and for a long time as possible. It may be his only time served for killing Daniel.

 

[geevee]

Same here Jewels, once he's sentenced and shipped out of state, logistics for another trial may be too much for them to push for one. So the judge better hand down satisfaction to his family down along with the sentence.

Just moo

 

[Jewels53]

More new motions filed in the Chrisman Docket Today 10/11/2013

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.g...rtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2010-153913

I can never get this to work. Go to this page to Case History in the middle of the page and click. Then type in Chrisman Richard.

Sorry

Geevee you are better at this. tia

 

[geevee]

More new motions filed in the Chrisman Docket Today 10/11/2013

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.g...rtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2010-153913

I can never get this to work. Go to this page to Case History in the middle of the page and click. Then type in Chrisman Richard.

Sorry

Geevee you are better at this. tia

Wow, lotta new stuff hit there today, I checked Arias' docket this afternoon figuring it being Friday was most likely day to post them but forgot to check his.

From this link you just click the name listed first, I don't know why it doesn't let us link directly to the docket (or probably many other pages):

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.g...sults.asp?lastName=Chrisman&FirstName=Richard

Wonder what the 'historical prior conviction' is?

Do you know what a 609 hearing is?

 

[Idaho Lynx]

A Rule 609 hearing is “A hearing to determine if a witness’s prior conviction can be used to impeach his testimony. This includes the defense and prosecution witnesses and the defendant.” There are no documents yet showing who the accusations are regarding.

 

[aa9511]

A Rule 609 hearing is “A hearing to determine if a witness’s prior conviction can be used to impeach his testimony. This includes the defense and prosecution witnesses and the defendant.” There are no documents yet showing who the accusations are regarding.

hmm....does anyone know if Ofr. Vergillo has any prior convictions? I remember his wife was caught up in some drug scandal while he was in the DEA or something like that, but I thought they cleared him of any participation in it or of even knowing about it?

Or maybe it has to do with Elvira and her marijuana conviction?? Maybe they are trying to use that to throw out her testimony and thus no "emotional harm" aggravating factor?

I'm thinking it might be the latter because the trial part is over and done with, I think the defense is now just focusing on getting the least amount of time served, and trying to throw out the aggravating factor.

JMO.

 

[geevee]

New motions:

10/11/2013 ACO - Allegation of Historical Priors - Party (001) 10/11/2013
NOTE: STATE'S ALLEGATION OF HISTORICAL PRIOR CONVICTION

10/11/2013 MOT - Motion - Party (001) 10/11/2013
NOTE: MOTION FOR RULE 609 HEARING

10/11/2013 NOT - Notice - Party (001) 10/11/2013
NOTE: NOTICE OF WITNESSES AND EXHBIITS FOR TRIAL OF HISTORICAL PRIOR CONVICTION

10/11/2013 REL - Reply - Party (001) 10/11/2013
NOTE: Reply to Response to Motion to Vacate Judgment of Aggravating Factor: "Emotional Harm" (Rule 24.2)
--

Apparently they can use prior convictions in other states to enhance sentences in Arizona, I guess JM found RC had a conviction elsewhere and wants to use it for the sentencing? It's what it sounds like to me but I'm no lawyer.

 

[geevee]

Upon a little further thinking; I wonder if those here who tweet could ask around and see who is going to live stream the sentencing? With all these motions we may get much more than just a reading of time to be served, seems like the probation investigation turned up an out of state conviction that JM wants to use to increase his sentence (from my reading of it), one of the motions says 'witnesses and exhibits for trial of prior historical conviction' - could it be more than a one day event?

 

[aa9511]

Geevee, I checked the case history and nothing new has come up.

I think you must be right on the prior conviction....it says state's motion so it must be regarding Chrisman himself?

 

[geevee]

Geevee, I checked the case history and nothing new has come up.

I think you must be right on the prior conviction....it says state's motion so it must be regarding Chrisman himself?

That's what I gather, and because the judge told RC he didn't have to participate with the probation dept. investigation it seemed to me they'd be looking for other bad acts of his, and must have found a conviction in another state that JM intends to use against him. It just keeps getting more interesting.

 

[Idaho Lynx]

I know I am 12 hours early.....just checking in. I assume court is still on for tomorrow (Fri 10/18). I have not seen anything to the contrary. I hope it is sentencing unless some motion will interrupt that process.

 

[geevee]

I know I am 12 hours early.....just checking in. I assume court is still on for tomorrow (Fri 10/18). I have not seen anything to the contrary. I hope it is sentencing unless some motion will interrupt that process.

According to the docket calendar it's still on for 8:30 a.m. AZ time tomorrow. No clue if it'll be live streamed or not, have to keep an eye on twitter for links to pop up (hopefully).

 

[Jewels53]

Trial Diva Jen ™ ‏@TrialDivasJ 15m
A lot of #richardchrisman supporters have arrived but we are all locked out of courtroom lol


Trial Diva Jen ™ ‏@TrialDivasJ 3m
We've been let into the courtroom waiting on Juan and #richardchrisman


Trial Diva Jen ™ ‏@TrialDivasJ 1m
Juan has arrived gray suit..black tie...fresh haircut! #JuanTieReport #richardchrisman

 

[Jewels53]

Trial Diva Jen ™ ‏@TrialDivasJ 1m
#richardchrisman just arrived in stripes and handcuffs
Expand