D
Deleted member 39678
Guest
The victim was unarmed when his body was found. Mr Kelly claims he saw armed men earlier. It's possible that both can be true. JMO.He was unarmed. Confirmed by MSM.
The victim was unarmed when his body was found. Mr Kelly claims he saw armed men earlier. It's possible that both can be true. JMO.He was unarmed. Confirmed by MSM.
Deported in 2016, 6-7 years ago.@PriorTheCreator , you forgot to mention that the deceased has a record of multiple illegal boarder crossings.
There are many exit points for this chain of events.
<modsnip>
Mr. Kelly has the legal right in Arizona to defend his home & family.
Waiting to see how this unfolds.
RBBMI think it will turn out to be the same, frustration combined with poor judgment. But here's the trouble. If the government OK's that everyone kill trespassers indiscriminately, it's basically vigilante war. And to clarify, I mean trespassers 80-100-150 yards away, not those trespassing into one's house.
I am curious as to the makeup of gender and ages of the 8 people in the group.
I think it might refer to Gulf gas station.Interesting. Does anyone know what a "golf station" is?
From your link "had previously sued to prevent a golf station from being built in Kino Springs" just a golf course, maybe they are called "stations" in UK where the DM is?
I don't see much visibility from his house, to the 80-100-150 yards away that the body was found, varying distance per several articles already posted. But maybe those photos are not February pics. IE less vegetation in February in the desert?
Was he just firing away at people seen through thick vegetation as shown in the pics in DM, allegedly, per his account, shooting over their heads?
He was unarmed. Confirmed by MSM.
lol thanks. DailyMail and all that. Even in their headline they say "I think it might refer to Gulf gas station.
It appears as though there are conflicting stories. What a surprise!
According to this article, and per the a written statement to the court by Defense attorney, the individuals were armed.
"As they ate, Mr. Kelly heard a single gunshot. Next, he saw his horse - who is old - running away scared and at full speed. Finally, he saw a group of men moving through the trees around his home.
They were armed with AK-47 rifles, dressed in khakis and camouflaged clothing, and carrying large backpacks. None of them were known to him. He hadn't given any of them permission to come onto his land. Based on the foregoing, Mr. Kelly was understandably concerned and reasonably feared for his safety."
![]()
Rancher who shot dead cartel drug smuggler doesn't know what to expect
George Alan Kelly is facing a 2nd degree murder charge for the January 30 shooting. He insists he did not shoot the Mexican man whose body was found on his Arizona ranch.www.dailymail.co.uk
Same with the large backpack. It could have contained something valuable that they would not want to leave behind. JMO.If they were in fact armed, I’d think it was likely that one of the victim’s friends would have collected his weapon for safekeeping.
It was in the afternoon. Some of the articles posted in the last few pages, here, answer some of your questions. A man who accompanied the victim before he was shot in the back from 80 - 100 yards distant, describes being close to the border, he could easily get back. There are a handful of good sources posted here today.Did the man who was shot cross a fence or go through a gate to intrude on private property? Was that property marked appropriately for no trespassing? I don’t think I’ve seen any info on that yet.
I have 58 acres in the middle of no where. If someone comes on to my marked and fenced land without letting me know, they risk being shot by me. My husband travels, I’m home with my elderly mother in law. If it’s dark out and hear voices I’m not waiting to see if they are close enough to determine if they are armed and there won’t be any warning shots unless I miss. Especially if there are voices, that means more than one and you don’t know how close the quiet ones are. There is no reason to be on my land unless you let me know you’ll be on my land, ie my neighbors have my number. I walk up and down my 700 foot drive way all the time, that’s just under 2 football fields in length and it doesn’t take me long. I don’t have a hard time believing this man was fearful for his and his wife’s life in the dark. I’m also not sure if he could tell under darkness and trees which way they were going, so shot in the front or back, he fired at them, where people weren’t supposed to be; on his private property, people he determined were a threat to him and his household.
IMOO.
Maybe the shot that GK heard was the shot that killed GCB. It could be one of the members of the group that killed GCB.It appears as though there are conflicting stories. What a surprise!
According to this article, and per the a written statement to the court by Defense attorney, the individuals were armed.
"As they ate, Mr. Kelly heard a single gunshot. Next, he saw his horse - who is old - running away scared and at full speed. Finally, he saw a group of men moving through the trees around his home.
They were armed with AK-47 rifles, dressed in khakis and camouflaged clothing, and carrying large backpacks. None of them were known to him. He hadn't given any of them permission to come onto his land. Based on the foregoing, Mr. Kelly was understandably concerned and reasonably feared for his safety."
![]()
Rancher who shot dead cartel drug smuggler doesn't know what to expect
George Alan Kelly is facing a 2nd degree murder charge for the January 30 shooting. He insists he did not shoot the Mexican man whose body was found on his Arizona ranch.www.dailymail.co.uk
There are a couple of interesting photos of his ranch in this source.Did the man who was shot cross a fence or go through a gate to intrude on private property? Was that property marked appropriately for no trespassing? I don’t think I’ve seen any info on that yet.
I have 58 acres in the middle of no where. If someone comes on to my marked and fenced land without letting me know, they risk being shot by me. My husband travels, I’m home with my elderly mother in law. If it’s dark out and hear voices I’m not waiting to see if they are close enough to determine if they are armed and there won’t be any warning shots unless I miss. Especially if there are voices, that means more than one and you don’t know how close the quiet ones are. There is no reason to be on my land unless you let me know you’ll be on my land, ie my neighbors have my number. I walk up and down my 700 foot drive way all the time, that’s just under 2 football fields in length and it doesn’t take me long. I don’t have a hard time believing this man was fearful for his and his wife’s life in the dark. I’m also not sure if he could tell under darkness and trees which way they were going, so shot in the front or back, he fired at them, where people weren’t supposed to be; on his private property, people he determined were a threat to him and his household.
IMOO.
ETA:
I reread and saw, eating lunch so day time. I guess I assumed it was night. If there is a group of men sneaking around my land during the day without permission, rules still stand. You aren’t supposed to be on my land I don’t know who is closer and not seen. And at that distance, with my scope I would be able to tell who is facing me but dressed in hoody or with a cap/hat and no scope. FedEx and UPS have box at end of drive to leave things, my contractor lets me know when they are coming out, friends call.
When the police arrived. He was part of a large group. They certainly wouldn’t leave a valuable weapon. The rancher said he fired over the heads of the gang.He was unarmed. Confirmed by MSM.
conflicting reports on whether or not he was shot in the back. I think I’ll wait for the coroner report as well as the ballistics report. Until then we truly know nothing.<modsnip>
We know a man is dead, shot in the back, he was unarmed and didnt pose a threat to the old man as he was over a football field away.
<modsnip: Opinion stated as fact>
Where does it say he was not shot in the back...I'd like to request a link for that because so far no one has posted an article with that claim.There are
conflicting reports on whether or not he was shot in the back. I think I’ll wait for the coroner report as well as the ballistics report. Until then we truly know nothing.
He was unarmed. Confirmed by MSM.
Where does it say he was not shot in the back...I'd like to request a link for that because so far no one has posted an article with that claim.