It's hard to tell from the preliminary hearing. Lot's of different facts and figures from all sides that contradict a lot of what has been presented as facts. I did note that on cross the person who had interviewed RAF/RAFG noted that he had a 30 minute interview with the victim (RAF/RAFG) but only 6 minutes of that interview was recorded. The person testifying did, however, indicate that his report documented the unrecorded portion of the interview. JMOI sure hope that all of the phone calls and interviews involving Mr Kelly and LE were recorded.
Well specifically they would not allow the FOIA request for the year of 2022. I'm so torn on this case TBH and am trying to approach it without any emotion. On one hand I see a man (GK) who has developed a relationship with BP Agents so much so that they have a key to his home and has stated that he prefers to call them due to the fact that they tend to respond quicker than the Santa Cruz County Sheriff office. He naturally becomes alarmed to the obvious increase in migration traffic and the call's increase. It would be understandable that the increasing encroachment on his property becomes more than a nuisance and that of a threat to his land and his dwelling with his elderly wife. It has been reported that he has been known to have shot a weapon before IIRC and perhaps that method worked out for him in the past and it was a method he was repeating to feel he was securing his property and his loved one.Wow!!! 30-40 times!!??? That is alot of times they were called!! And, just in the last month? Whew!
Also stated in the article was that the BP agents could not or would not give a number of times called to his property in the last YEAR! That says alot right there....to me.
It makes me wonder why the LE wouldn't believe Mr Kelly's story from Jan 30, knowing why he had called them repeatedly previously. I believe the reasons for his calls were more than likely the same, although the article does not specify so.
Previously I had stated my concerns and questions regarding ( my opinion ) the DA's charging Mr Kelly too quickly, and now I doubt even more, WHY ?...after all the time that LE and BP has been called to his property reportedly.
Peace
BUT on the other hand I wonder if the repeated calls to his property were viewed as unwarranted and that he may have been seen as a loose cannon. Willing to fire off a round or two without regard or cognizance of whom he may have been shooting at and whether they were an actual threat or not.