AZ - Gabriel Johnson, 8 months, 26 Dec 2009 - last seen in Texas - #10

[TakeABiteOuttaCrime]

The indictment comes as the San Antonio Police Department has opened its own investigation into Gabriel's disappearance. Elizabeth Johnson spent six days in San Antonio, and her car was found at a motel there.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2010/01/16/20100116babywarrant0116.html

Any updates on that?

 

[gibby207]

which girl might that be?

also, TS is deleting like crazy right about now

Again???? Wow... sumpin is happenin over at "The Villa."

 

[Dum-Dum Sucker]

I read to my son every single day from the day I brought him home from the hospital.

The book on the bed looks like a notebook to me.

The rattle and sippy cup may not have been within her view.

I just don't get the trashing of the babysitter. She's only 18 years old. She was kind and caring towards Gabriel for a couple of hours. There's nothing more to it than that.

:cow:

:thumb: I agree with your entire post.

 

[gibby207]

Alrighty. Just finished reading thread #10. Now back to pick up on thread #3 and work my way up. :banghead:
You guys are doing a great job! Carry on. :woohoo:

Personally, I'm feeling really good now that angarella is here... stellar hat! LOL! :woohoo:

 

[DairyGirl]

What gets me is that she says it took LE 15 days to talk to her. That is not true because from almost the beginning LE has called the Smiths persons of interest and said they feel they are holding back infomation. So obviously they must have talked to them initially are LE wouldn't say they are holding back.

 

[gibby207]

I do not really care that TS lied about CC, to be honest she doesn't owe the media an explanation. What matters is that she attempted to illegally alienate Gabriel from his father! And that she answers to him and the State for it.

Sooooo true... and has a history of the like!!!

 

[mamaeb]

What gets me is that she says it took LE 15 days to talk to her. That is not true because from almost the beginning LE has called the Smiths persons of interest and said they feel they are holding back infomation. So obviously they must have talked to them initially are LE wouldn't say they are holding back.

plus when people told her about the beth posts she claimed she had already told the fbi.

 

[gibby207]

bwahahahahaha -- I just noticed your siggy!

Tee hee! (nice to see ya) :woohoo:

 

[angarella]

Personally, I'm feeling really good now that angarella is here... stellar hat! LOL! :woohoo:

:crazy: Try to stay on thread #10 until I get caught up. K? Thx. And as of 34 minutes ago, "you know who" is still alive and well on FB. :angel:

 

[Bratlings]

What gets me is that she says it took LE 15 days to talk to her. That is not true because from almost the beginning LE has called the Smiths persons of interest and said they feel they are holding back infomation. So obviously they must have talked to them initially are LE wouldn't say they are holding back.

OK consider this... They hauled them in and asked them if they had anything to do with helping her leave, or helping her while she is on the run. If they know where she was or is at that time and if she was meeting someone. Maybe they asked her why Elizabeth would do this. They probably asked what her connection to EJ is. She is under no obligation to confess to possibly a felony regarding paperwork and honestly I cant see how it has much to do with finding Gabriel. It shows that TS is manipulative and selfish, and self serving but it still doesnt help find Gabriel.

 

[gibby207]

What's going on in Tammi FB land? Anyone poor Jack's friend??

 

[Bratlings]

Sooooo true... and has a history of the like!!!

I dont agree with that. It has previously come to light that custody of "H" was taken by the State of TN and placed with Tammie and Jack. The State of TN was in control of that situation and how it turned out. It was not Tammie or Jack's responsibility to find or contact the father or his parents.

 

[angarella]

What's going on in Tammi FB land? Anyone poor Jack's friend??

Not JS's friend but TS made a post 34 mintues ago.:innocent:

 

[MyLilElves]

Off to bed. Hope to wake up and read that Gabriel is back in the arms of his Daddy.

We're praying for you Baby Gabriel. xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo.

 

[cleo612]

We all know that Tammi is unable to keep her mouth shut. She dribbles little bits and pieces of information out to the public so that she can keep the attention focused on herself. She has now admitted to lying to law enforcement, although I don't think that she used the term "lying."

My feeling is that the reason she had an "inconclusive" result on her polygraph is that she parces words. I have known many people like her in my life and they can be most annoying. If a question is not PRECISELY worded to include any and all possibilities, she will sidestep the truth and say, "But you didn't ask me THAT." She did this in reference to the Craig Cherry situation.

When it came out that she had provided this man's name to Elizabeth, she claimed that she had not been asked about that name. She never told law enforcement that Mr. Cherry is in fact her first cousin--because they probably did not ask her if she knew him and/or if she had any relationship to him. Unless they came right out and asked her specifically if she filled out the paperwork which was submitted to the court for paternity, she could sidestep the truth--just as she did--by saying that all she did was make copies and did not read the papers.

I feel the same is possible regarding any other questions she might have been asked by law enforcement.

Let's say that law enforcement asks her if she introduced Elizabeth to a couple who wanted to adopt a baby. She can, in her mind, truthfully say, "No," because:

(1) she was not present at the meeting wherein Elizabeth met a couple, therefore Tammi could not have introduced them, or

(2) it might not have been a couple but a single person who wanted to adopt a baby, or

(3) whomever was to meet Elizabeth to receive physical custody of Gabriel might not have been the same person(s) that wanted to adopt a baby and was instead an adoption agent or baby broker.

Tammi needs to be asked each question specifically, outlining any possible scenario or theory for which she could possibly have any involvement, otherwise she is going to try to talk circles around the interrogator(s). She does it on her Facebook; I am sure she is doing it with law enforcement.

I have no doubt that Tammi is up to her eyeballs involved in Gabriel's disappearance in some form or fashion. I do not trust her or Jack AT ALL.

Anyone who thinks that it is a good thing that they are persons of interest in a child's disappearance and that it is a good thing to have law enforcement come to their home late at night to execute a search warrant, is trying really hard to convince themselves (and the rest of the world) that they are going to get away with something that they did wrong.

Well, this chickie ain't buyin' it, Mr. and Mrs. Smith. You might as well own up to everything you have said and done to help Elizabeth in little Gabriel's disappearance because you WILL be found out and law enforcement officials do not take lightly to being jerked around--especially when it involves the life of an innocent little baby.

 

[fran]

Oh, for petes sake, can this woman ever just tell the truth? Now she is saying they withheld the truth about CC from the media until LE interviewed them, which took 15 days. They were trying to be sensitive to CC. Why doesn't she just admit that she lied because she didn't want to get into trouble.

LOL, that's just a {balloon} that's she's floating out there to see if people on her FB believe her.

Ehhhhh,...........................NO! LOL, but don't tell her that. Let her THINK people will believe her and let her put it out there on the media tour tomorrow.:loser:

She's an idi*t!

Whatever!
fran

 

[Ives]

Is JS the attorney that the s' had contact EJ?? (so they say of course)
If so, I would not trust a lawyer who spells as bad as me.

 

[Bratlings]

We all know that Tammi is unable to keep her mouth shut. She dribbles little bits and pieces of information out to the public so that she can keep the attention focused on herself. She has now admitted to lying to law enforcement, although I don't think that she used the term "lying."

My feeling is that the reason she had an "inconclusive" result on her polygraph is that she parces words. I have known many people like her in my life and they can be most annoying. If a question is not PRECISELY worded to include any and all possibilities, she will sidestep the truth and say, "But you didn't ask me THAT." She did this in reference to the Craig Cherry situation.

When it came out that she had provided this man's name to Elizabeth, she claimed that she had not been asked about that name. She never told law enforcement that Mr. Cherry is in fact her first cousin--because they probably did not ask her if she knew him and/or if she had any relationship to him. Unless they came right out and asked her specifically if she filled out the paperwork which was submitted to the court for paternity, she could sidestep the truth--just as she did--by saying that all she did was make copies and did not read the papers.

I feel the same is possible regarding any other questions she might have been asked by law enforcement.

Let's say that law enforcement asks her if she introduced Elizabeth to a couple who wanted to adopt a baby. She can, in her mind, truthfully say, "No," because:

(1) she was not present at the meeting wherein Elizabeth met a couple, therefore Tammi could not have introduced them, or

(2) it might not have been a couple but a single person who wanted to adopt a baby, or

(3) whomever was to meet Elizabeth to receive physical custody of Gabriel might not have been the same person(s) that wanted to adopt a baby and was instead an adoption agent or baby broker.

Tammi needs to be asked each question specifically, outlining any possible scenario or theory for which she could possibly have any involvement, otherwise she is going to try to talk circles around the interrogator(s). She does it on her Facebook; I am sure she is doing it with law enforcement.

I have no doubt that Tammi is up to her eyeballs involved in Gabriel's disappearance in some form or fashion. I do not trust her or Jack AT ALL.

Anyone who thinks that it is a good thing that they are persons of interest in a child's disappearance and that it is a good thing to have law enforcement come to their home late at night to execute a search warrant, is trying really hard to convince themselves (and the rest of the world) that they are going to get away with something that they did wrong.

Well, this chickie ain't buyin' it, Mr. and Mrs. Smith. You might as well own up to everything you have said and done to help Elizabeth in little Gabriel's disappearance because you WILL be found out and law enforcement officials do not take lightly to being jerked around--especially when it involves the life of an innocent little baby.

Very good post.

 

[OneLove]

I dont agree with that. It has previously come to light that custody of "H" was taken by the State of TN and placed with Tammie and Jack. The State of TN was in control of that situation and how it turned out. It was not Tammie or Jack's responsibility to find or contact the father or his parents.[/QUOTE]

Ya might wanna run this by a good attorney. :waitasec:

If intentionally lied in an effort to PREVENT the father from having knowledge of what was happening (the father says Jack's own daughter lied to him to accomplish this), then they might face charges.

If Tammi and Jack circumvented the law to illegally take a child from a parent, then the State of Tennessee was NOT in control of that situation. They had to assume that the statements made by the "so called" responsible parties were TRUTHFUL. :banghead:

 

[fran]

So now they withheld it because of sensitivity? I thought it was because she forgot all about it?:waitasec::waitasec:

Yeah, except isn't that line 'COPYWRITED?'

Steve Martin's saying.............................

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FORGOT!

Yeah, that's it!

:croc:
fran