AZ - Gabriel Johnson, 8 months, 26 Dec 2009 - last seen in Texas - #9

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #301
Woah, and I see someone said all of America has fallen in love with Tammi and Jack. :waitasec:

Prolly LE, getting on their good side... lol
 
  • #302
hmm I posted the facebook deleted threads and will change it.

Sorry, I forgot I was addressing two posts. And then Princess said that she didn't....I'll go edit mine.

(My coffeemaker is broken and I am quitting smoking, so if you can understand, I am um...edgy.)
Happens to the best of us.
 
  • #303
Off to lunch. I just wanted to say that TPS could have easily bought a netbook or something. You can get Netbooks for under $250.00 at Walmart. If LE took her computer, I'm sure she would get something. There's no way she could be offline for that long.
 
  • #304
Sorry, I forgot I was addressing two posts. And then Princess said that she didn't....I'll go edit mine.

(My coffeemaker is broken and I am quitting smoking, so if you can understand, I am um...edgy.)
Happens to the best of us.

Oh wow! Good luck to you with that!!
 
  • #305
Sorry, I forgot I was addressing two posts. And then Princess said that she didn't....I'll go edit mine.

(My coffeemaker is broken and I am quitting smoking, so if you can understand, I am um...edgy.)
Happens to the best of us.

I don't mind. I have no idea all the rules here and appreciate the input to make sure I keep my handle!
 
  • #306
The deleted comment from FB is not a copy/paste? If not, then my apologies.

And you didn't use her name, but you told people where to look. Maybe you can PM her here and ask if she minds?
I don't know on that one, since it seems to be a gray area. I know that if a poster feels they have been outed and goes to the mods and they agree, it's automatic ban.

I thought she was saying the she herself posted this on FB and these replies are to HER on facebook? maybe I am imagining things!
 
  • #307
The deleted comment from FB is not a copy/paste? If not, then my apologies.

And you didn't use her name, but you told people where to look. Maybe you can PM her here and ask if she minds?
I don't know on that one, since it seems to be a gray area. I know that if a poster feels they have been outed and goes to the mods and they agree, it's automatic ban.

I edited my earlier post. Very sorry. Still learning. Thank you for pointing this out to me.
I paraphrased her statement. and I pointed out to ppl where to look because they ask. Didn't know it was against TOS. I apologize.
 
  • #308
Hmmm....

Is Grandpa angry that she took off with his car? Has anyone asked him if HE had a GPS?

Has anyone talked to her new "roommate"? I doubt he knows much, if anything, but it's possible he's not a total stranger, already knew E before he moved in, or that she told him "why" she was going to have an empty bedroom all of a sudden.

Is Logan still making payments on that trailer? Or should E have used some of that money she gathered in early Dec to make a payment. Wonder if the lights and heat are still on for the new roomie??

Also, does anyone know what the 12/8 fight between E and L was about? Maybe about E wanting to adopt out the child that they had been raising for 8 months? The child that L had been bonding with, even if E wasn't.


BTW, I agree that if E was going to throw out a 2nd possible father's name in order to delay determination of custody, she would not have hesitated to use the name of a friend of Logan's, if there was any truth to that. She was very angry at L at the time, and using his friend's name would be a great way to cause L pain. Only problem is, L probably trusted his friend's word over E's word, so that wouldn't work. So TPS suggested a name that L wouldn't know and couldn't easily verify. Add to that the fact that CC is her cousin, so if it flies, she's automatically "family" with the baby she wants to adopt. Two birds, one stone. She'd get with CC later to arrange a little reward for his cooperation.

What I don't get, is how they thought the court would just accept that CC was the dad. A paternity test given to L would prove a 99% chance he was the father (isn't that how they work?), and a paternity test of CC would prove a 0% chance, right? So it had to be just a stalling technique, IMO. Or maybe they thought L would just bail once he got an idea that maybe Gabe wasn't his, that maybe E had been unfaithful all along. IDK, hard to figure out what these nut-jobs would think, since their logic is so warped, compared to normal people.
 
  • #309
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/149100#slComments

Early article....interesting info that EJ had been texting Logan, threatening to harm Gabe before the text saying she killed him. Also, under comments, I think hgrace is actually Tammi.....same spiel about EJ keeping Gabes shots up to date....
 
  • #310
I really am sorry PrincessA and mamaeb, that was much harsher sounding than I intended. It looks like I was sitting here with my nose in the air when I typed it, and I didn't mean it to sound that way.

Last I knew, we couldn't even copy/paste our own comments. And I do worry about the other posters here in connection with the case, since we don't know how far this could reach and the poster that was being discussed has a lot of personal info on her FB. Couple that with someone maybe going back and reading all of her posts here...it seems a lot of damage could be done with that.
 
  • #311
Paraphrase -

Someone has posted to everyone praying for TSP to please continue to intercede in her behalf as she has mocked God and is Satan's vessel, including a little quote from the Bible.

Another poster has seconded the motion.
 
  • #312
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/149100#slComments

Early article....interesting info that EJ had been texting Logan, threatening to harm Gabe before the text saying she killed him. Also, under comments, I think hgrace is actually Tammi.....same spiel about EJ keeping Gabes shots up to date....

maybe, or a friend or jack... but there is no misspelled words. Actually..... her daughter's name is H. G. smith.... so the handle would make sense to be theirs
 
  • #313
Hmmm....

Is Grandpa angry that she took off with his car? Has anyone asked him if HE had a GPS?

Has anyone talked to her new "roommate"? I doubt he knows much, if anything, but it's possible he's not a total stranger, already knew E before he moved in, or that she told him "why" she was going to have an empty bedroom all of a sudden.

Is Logan still making payments on that trailer? Or should E have used some of that money she gathered in early Dec to make a payment. Wonder if the lights and heat are still on for the new roomie??

Also, does anyone know what the 12/8 fight between E and L was about? Maybe about E wanting to adopt out the child that they had been raising for 8 months? The child that L had been bonding with, even if E wasn't.


BTW, I agree that if E was going to throw out a 2nd possible father's name in order to delay determination of custody, she would not have hesitated to use the name of a friend of Logan's, if there was any truth to that. She was very angry at L at the time, and using his friend's name would be a great way to cause L pain. Only problem is, L probably trusted his friend's word over E's word, so that wouldn't work. So TPS suggested a name that L wouldn't know and couldn't easily verify. Add to that the fact that CC is her cousin, so if it flies, she's automatically "family" with the baby she wants to adopt. Two birds, one stone. She'd get with CC later to arrange a little reward for his cooperation.

What I don't get, is how they thought the court would just accept that CC was the dad. A paternity test given to L would prove a 99% chance he was the father (isn't that how they work?), and a paternity test of CC would prove a 0% chance, right? So it had to be just a stalling technique, IMO. Or maybe they thought L would just bail once he got an idea that maybe Gabe wasn't his, that maybe E had been unfaithful all along. IDK, hard to figure out what these nut-jobs would think, since their logic is so warped, compared to normal people.



Maybe people can pay to get a false DNA report? Where there are markets, there are suppliers. Maybe that would have somehow been usurped as later on - seems to me these adoption things have a lot of closed records and secrecy. Obviously, some have faked papers and willing attorneys, etc (Janet Morris and The Adoption Agency) to get what they want - people who know all the nuances.


Once the deed is done and legal records are publicly sealed, it is very difficult to find one's that are unethical or illegal as most of it was done legally and the court waved it hand over it. I believe this is what happened in Travis Warford's case.
 
  • #314
BBM. I think a lot of this is just speculation from TPS isn't it? Wasn't the ad for Pomeranians? Didn't TPS spend 4 hours in EJ's trailer? Didn't she see the dogs? Do we have an ad for the laptop and the jewellery? Do you have a copy of all 4? I'd love to see them. And welcome back :).

Kamille, I'm putting together the best information I have. Unfortunately, that means including some information from, for example, Tammi and Elizabeth, that does not have other corroborating references.

LE stated they believe she had $1,200. Please note that I put 'approximately' for the amount of money she had. Add or subtract as you feel appropriate.

As I posted a bit above, I can't include all the reference links or the posts get too long to post. After I put the info together with everybody's updates, I will do two posts for each date - one with what happened, and one with the reference links.

I've been working hard on this. It is my best, regardless of how inadequate it may be. Please give me a chance to get everything posted, and get everyone's feedback, and get the reference links posted.
 
  • #315
I really am sorry PrincessA and mamaeb, that was much harsher sounding than I intended. It looks like I was sitting here with my nose in the air when I typed it, and I didn't mean it to sound that way.

Last I knew, we couldn't even copy/paste our own comments. And I do worry about the other posters here in connection with the case, since we don't know how far this could reach and the poster that was being discussed has a lot of personal info on her FB. Couple that with someone maybe going back and reading all of her posts here...it seems a lot of damage could be done with that.

Thank you for your post and apology. I did go back and edit my posts <taking out the initials> That statement I posted from Tammi from her fb was paraphrased. I realize there is a lot of personal info out there and for everyone to see. It really doesn't matter what Tammi posts on her fb anyways but since not everyone has access to some info, I was trying to help by posting some of her posts that seem relevant to me.
I certainly will add a link to those post however they will take you nowhere close to the post but rather to the fb sign-up page.
Sorry for the confusion and again, thank you for taking the time to explain and correct me. :-)

Are we good now?:angel:
 
  • #316
Thank you for your post and apology. I did go back and edit my posts <taking out the initials> That statement I posted from Tammi from her fb was paraphrased. I realize there is a lot of personal info out there and for everyone to see. It really doesn't matter what Tammi posts on her fb anyways but since not everyone has access to some info, I was trying to help by posting some of her posts that seem relevant to me.
I certainly will add a link to those post however they will take you nowhere close to the post but rather to the fb sign-up page.
Sorry for the confusion and again, thank you for taking the time to explain and correct me. :-)

Are we good now?:angel:
Totally. I was in the wrong myself.
 
  • #317
maybe, or a friend or jack... but there is no misspelled words. Actually..... her daughter's name is H. G. smith.... so the handle would make sense to be theirs

H's middle name is grace
 
  • #318
  • #319
I wonder if grandpa reported his car stolen? If not, why not? Maybe he gave her the car to use.....
 
  • #320
Sorry had to run the kids to school.

I say they probably didn't seize her computer as I can see new posts on her FB page made by Tammi herself. I also say she is using a computer because when you post via phone it shows a little <phone> icon beside the post.

Could she be at a friends house? Sure. But at 7am?
JMHO

I don't see any posts by her at 7 a.m. She could've deleted it I suppose ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
1,694
Total visitors
1,761

Forum statistics

Threads
632,381
Messages
18,625,479
Members
243,125
Latest member
JosBay
Back
Top