Rather bizarrely, I have to say, I'm seeing some weird parallels between Little Miss X and Beverly
Rose
Potts, who according to some sources was nicknamed
Rosebud by her mother and grandmother. Beverly Rose Potts:
View attachment 613234View attachment 613235View attachment 613236
Look how different this girl looks from image to image. & here's Little Miss X:
View attachment 613241And I won't include all the images available but they're available, and she also seems to have different "looks," and I don't know that this is artist interpretation, it may weirdly be in line with reality to some degree.
One problem with this comparison is hair color. Little Miss X had brown hair, and Beverly is listed as having blonde hair. Beverly's hair was cut fairly short when she was abducted in 1951, I believe. Projected the Doe wouldn't have been murdered until 1957 at the earliest. if she's Little Miss X. The hair color can naturally change in blondies at such an age, I've seen it happen. Moreover, if she disappeared in 1951 and wasn't killed until 1957, someone was almost certainly trying to conceal her identity to the extent possible, and you're looking at six years of hair growth (and hair dye) in that time. And finally, Beverly's hair must have been an incredibly dark blonde for it to photograph as it does, some would probably label it brown (myself included). And this is Little Miss X's hair, right?
View attachment 613247Seeing her hair like this reminds me of the story of how Beverly's mother retained her daughter's long pigtails after Beverly insisted on having it cut short. And I believe that was done shortly before she was taken. Also wondered about height. Little Miss X is 5'3". I know Beverly was tall for 10 at 4'11". But I'm seeing that the projections for adult height are all over the place, it's impossible to accurately predict, just a multitude of factors involved. We don't know what her diet would have been like in the hypothetical abduction period. And there's always a chance I would think Little Miss X was left out there before 1957, time of death is a projection.
If this is Beverly, who would abduct her and keep her for that many years, and then kill her? Person's clearly deranged, predator, may have had some familiarity with the family, some axe to grind with one or more of the family members. The axe to grind may have had no rational basis or reality behind it. But I also think it would be possible this was someone completely unknown who somehow managed to strike up a conversation with her. Either way, it's someone who could easily disappear from that entire area and go elsewhere with a young girl without drawing too much attention. If Little Miss X were Beverly, the abductor had to be someone who traveled pretty extensively, Little Miss X is found near the Grand Canyon, and Beverly disappeared from Cleveland. She was at a festival of artists, and they travel. Not saying it was an artist, not saying carnival, but wouldn't rule these out. Also, he may have threatened Beverly once he had her in his grasp, and told her he'd do something in terms of her family members if she refused to comply.
I know it is far-fetched. But I'd completely given up on finding anyone to match Little Miss X after seeing Donnis Redman and Mary Margaret Begay ruled out. And there's nothing, nobody with this "P" and "R," not that I saw listed. And I thought Beverly didn't have it either, her initials would be BRP. But thinking of the hair and the nail file. The way Little Miss X had her hair reminded me of Beverly's pigtail story. Maybe if it was Beverly, it would remind her, too. & if she was abducted and traveling, she probably couldn't put her actual initials on that article because the abductor was concealing her identity. But maybe the "P" really was for the last name, Potts, and the R for Rosebud, or her middle name Rose, and this was a way of connecting to her past.
So again, I know it's far-fetched, but it's times like this when I remind myself never to forget Suzanne Sevakis. Yes, I know these are both really, really old cases. I find it difficult to believe this possibility wasn't explored and dismissed long ago, Little Miss X was found just a handful of years after Beverly went missing. There are dentals for both. I'm probably missing some key factor that would make this whole thing impossible. Again, though, I think of Suzanne Sevakis. I doubt it was common in the 50s to even consider a long-term abduction with a murder of that same victim occurring several years later in a completely different state, pretty much across the country. And just a final note, researching and it appears that with poor diet, damage is done much more quickly to hair than teeth. Along with hair dye involved, it's expected you'd see more damaged hair but less damaged teeth with a longer term abduction. Little Miss X's hair looks perhaps damaged to me, but she had excellent dentals with several fillings, and I see Beverly had fillings as well, and also gaps between her teeth (Since I can't find likenesses for the Doe showing her teeth, I don't know if she had gaps, and would have to check if gaps could have narrowed or closed in this timeframe).
I've got no idea if Beverly is Little Miss X or not, I can see parallels. I definitely wouldn't go so far to say it's "likely." But either way, I would definitely suspect Little Miss X to be a longer term abduction.
RIP.