JQP, did you see Knox' reply to you last thread, and my jump off of Knox' post? Some of us think you were on to something with the neighbor. It does look like LE spent some time looking into him, anyway. I agree his behavior was more than odd.
No, no, that's hoosegow!
I suddenly remembered the Tumble Bus from yesterday also - associated with the maglighter's address. I still think that is odd!
Yea you would think if you thought to call at all, it would be to get help from that large group of people! I really don't know what to think about SC that morning? :waitasec: Yes,odd indeed!?
JQP, did you see Knox' reply to you last thread, and my jump off of Knox' post? Some of us think you were on to something with the neighbor. It does look like LE spent some time looking into him, anyway. I agree his behavior was more than odd.
Was it associated with the address? I thought it was the phone number on reports. That could be who AG works for? IDK
No, I did not see it... I will go look.
Then the resident informed the officer that a man matching NMcDs description "
address and phone number. She actually has a job with a Science center or something like that.
http://www.healthcare.com/profile/vals-tumble-bus/
(haven't rechecked that phone #)
Maybe the "Vals Tumble Bus" is part time or ? I think it is worth looking into.
Can you point me to where you determined this part about the witness description matching NMc? because we were not able to find/determine tht.
JPQ wrote
Correcting ... it's the Sonoran Science Academy (a K-12 school)
Teacher 2nd grade is most likely
There is a Broadway campus
PDF 3 PG 17 and PDF 5 PG 31
I have posted those reports, but I am not aware of any statement where witness description matched the descripton of the neighbor. I saw he gave a description, but how do we know that witness descripton matches NMc's description in the reports?
Where do we see description of Celis' neighbor NMC?
I have posted those reports, but I am not aware of any statement where witness description matched the descripton of the neighbor. I saw he gave a description, but how do we know that witness descripton matches NMc's description in the reports?
Where do we see description of Celis' neighbor NMC?
I am leaning more to the belief that because there is so much info on NMcD released that it is, in the big scheme of things, unimportant. I just don't see TPD throwing that out there if they think he is a suspect, even more so after realizing all the stuff missing in the dump.
Agree 100%. LE has essentially released what amounts to some soy filler in the big picture with just a few important details. They know there are enough pages and enough non-essential or not really connected to the case detail to keep the public engaged in the pile. Meanwhile, the vast majority of the public doesn't realize these documents are not the real meat of the case, and while people are focused on these piles of documents, it keeps the public out of LE's hair, so to speak. That allows LE to maintain the confidential, important, and salient info and preserves it for future possible litigation while everyone is busy dissecting a document dump.
Win/Win strategy and pretty smart of LE. LE's version of "ooohhh look..a sparkly birdie over there!"
<public runs over to look at sparkly birdie and gets distracted on the meaning of sparkly birdie>) IMO.
Agree 100%. LE has essentially released what amounts to some soy filler in the big picture with just a few important details. They know there are enough pages and enough non-essential or not really connected to the case detail to keep the public engaged in the pile. Meanwhile, the vast majority of the public doesn't realize these documents are not the real meat of the case, and while people are focused on these piles of documents, it keeps the public out of LE's hair, so to speak. Meanwhile LE maintains the confidential, important, and salient info and preserves it for future possible litigation.
Win/Win strategy and pretty smart of LE. LE's version of "ooohhh look..a sparkly birdie over there!"
<public runs over to look at sparkly birdie and gets distracted on the meaning of sparkly birdie>) IMO.
I beg to differ... LE doe's not get to pick and choose what is released due to the FOIA they have no choice but to release the entirety of thier reports however are permitted to redact only portions of the information which give out things they wish to use in court and peoples address information. ( which really does not help because the addresses of those people can be located by using the parcel maps ) There were tooo many things found in the NMcD home that were to say the least incriminating. He was seen in two places where evidence was found, there was discovery in the alley behind chris' home and in the wash area where NMcD was seen coming from. Now, we can place him in both places, we have evidence found in both areas... There is enough there to justify searching his home, there more things are found. I think the only thing we are missing here is the victim... What did he do with her ? Did he take the evidence down to those areas to hide it ? Did he take Isa somewhere else and later hide his evidence ?
Another thing I found interesting looking at the Crime Maps and limiting the points to Kidnapping is there have been 4 kidnappings all within a 3 mile radius of the home. Then add in the Child Molestations and the core of those are around the house as well.