- Joined
- Jun 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,229
- Reaction score
- 118
As far as public records go http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/courts/QDPS/Search/CitySearch.aspx
RC has one CR charge for a DUI from 2002 that was diverted, completely dismissed as allowed by AZ courts for a first-time offense.
SC has one CR charge for a DUI from 1997 that was diverted, completely dismissed as allowed by AZ courts for a first time offense.
Other than these old cases, SC has the two misdemeanor charges for dogs at large from 4/19 of this year.
This equals one diversion for RC 9 years ago, and one for SC 15 years ago.
IMO this does not seem to indicate "the Celis' break the law often with zero consequences."
I think they probably had to go through a period of monitoring and classes as part of the diversion program before charges were dismissed.
I'd thought I'd share one of our local's perspective on the Arizona and Pima County diversion program. This was from thread 4. (I'm including my own post for context.)
__________________
As for the animals at large, I remember quite a few posts over the many threads wondered why Tucson was so strict to file criminal charges for dogs at large. Personally, I think offering a diversion to get those first time animal-related misdemeanor charges dismissed is not that outrageous. I don't think that AZ is alone on offering diversion programs for first-time DUI's or for first time non-violent offenders.
While, I do agree we need stricter laws and punishment for DUI's across this country, I don't find that going through diversion once for RC 9 years ago, and once for SC 15 years ago evidence that this family is getting any kind of special treatment. Each had one. Personally, I would never drink and drive.
Still, if a court of law decides to dismiss charges, I feel that I should respect that dismissal.
I have a lot of confidence in LE in this case, and the more time I spend researching AZ cases, the more I like AZ as a state.
JMO
RC has one CR charge for a DUI from 2002 that was diverted, completely dismissed as allowed by AZ courts for a first-time offense.
SC has one CR charge for a DUI from 1997 that was diverted, completely dismissed as allowed by AZ courts for a first time offense.
Other than these old cases, SC has the two misdemeanor charges for dogs at large from 4/19 of this year.
This equals one diversion for RC 9 years ago, and one for SC 15 years ago.
IMO this does not seem to indicate "the Celis' break the law often with zero consequences."
I think they probably had to go through a period of monitoring and classes as part of the diversion program before charges were dismissed.
I'd thought I'd share one of our local's perspective on the Arizona and Pima County diversion program. This was from thread 4. (I'm including my own post for context.)
Originally Posted by Prof 04-25-2012, 08:15 PM
When they go through a Diversion does that get charges dismissed?
http://www.sc.pima.gov/?tabid=188
"Adult Diversion 5
If a defendant has no previous criminal record and the charges pending are non-violent, the defendant may be considered for the Pima County Adult Diversion Program. This program helps rehabilitate offenders by counseling, education, restitution, and community service. Usually a person cannot enter the program without the approval of the arresting officer and the victim. If accepted into the program, the defendant enters a plea of guilty but sentencing is suspended. The person will usually have to pay restitution to the victim. If the defendant successfully completes a one to two year treatment program, the charges may be dismissed. If at any time during the course of the program the defendant violates the rules of the program or the law, prosecution will resume and sentencing will occur."
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - AZ AZ - Isabel Mercedes Celis, 6, Tucson, 20 April 2012 - #4. Yes that is a very popular program here with first time offenders and it is possible that is what happened.
__________________
As for the animals at large, I remember quite a few posts over the many threads wondered why Tucson was so strict to file criminal charges for dogs at large. Personally, I think offering a diversion to get those first time animal-related misdemeanor charges dismissed is not that outrageous. I don't think that AZ is alone on offering diversion programs for first-time DUI's or for first time non-violent offenders.
While, I do agree we need stricter laws and punishment for DUI's across this country, I don't find that going through diversion once for RC 9 years ago, and once for SC 15 years ago evidence that this family is getting any kind of special treatment. Each had one. Personally, I would never drink and drive.
Still, if a court of law decides to dismiss charges, I feel that I should respect that dismissal.
I have a lot of confidence in LE in this case, and the more time I spend researching AZ cases, the more I like AZ as a state.
JMO