Diane Marie Webb http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/w/webb_diane.html?
With the scant info, it is a reasonable possibility
Diane Marie Webb http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/w/webb_diane.html?
Reading a map is not my strong suit. So, I believe your wordI refer you to the map I posted earlier.
Yes, it was and is a very remote spot. The nearest road access is a dead end road leading to a picnic site several miles to the east.
Sorry for the obsession, but in those days, do 15yo girls used Avon make-up ? I clearly doubt so
1977 is well after the EDD. She would not had had the Monarch Match Co" matchbox
My first option would be Laurie Allison Smith. She was LKA in Tucson in 1977
http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/s/smith_laurie.html
She would be an easy comparison, since her four first-bicuspids were removed when she was younger.
The only woman missing from Arizona on namus that fits the timeframe and age parameters is Diane Webb, missing on 5-6-1959 from Phoenix. The last person to see her was supposedly her husband who gave her money to take a bus “home”. I don’t know if that means to her parents, or what. But, if you did murder your wife, this extremely remote location seems like a place a husband would dump remains. She has DNA according to namus, so I guess she’s a rule out by default.
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/15075/196
It's strongly believed by her family that she was murdered by her husband, later on in years he reportedly tried to deny that he and Diane were ever married. They were able to prove he was lying as they had attended their wedding and found records of the marriage license as well.The only woman missing from Arizona on namus that fits the timeframe and age parameters is Diane Webb, missing on 5-6-1959 from Phoenix. The last person to see her was supposedly her husband who gave her money to take a bus “home”. I don’t know if that means to her parents, or what. But, if you did murder your wife, this extremely remote location seems like a place a husband would dump remains. She has DNA according to namus, so I guess she’s a rule out by default.
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/15075/196
It wasn't unknown for 15 year old girls at that time to get married.
Unless UID has nuclear DNA while MP has mitochondrial DNA ! In this case, it won't match because of the different DNA profile.She has DNA according to namus, so I guess shes a rule out by default.
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/15075/196
Unless the LKA date is when the report was filed, while she was missing for much longer.You're right. I wasn't paying enough attention to the case details.
Sadly, stranger things have happenedIt is strange that hair and matchbooks would be still there after 25 years.
Agreed. I assumed that the end date (1959-1965) was dictated by the time the lipstick shade or the matchbooks ceased production, but it would be good to have confirmation of that. No doubt Avon's archivist or historian would know the production dates of the shade.
15 is too young for the Avon cosmetics.
And from the photo, yes, she is naturally blond.
Diane Marie Webb http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/w/webb_diane.html?
"demonstration tube of "Pagoda" lipstick (Avon)" so, the Pagoda lipstick is from Avon. Written black and white in the case report.Hi Giucy, don't sure why you think that about the Avon cosmetics. It's clear Donnis has lipstick on in her picture and was 15. Of course we don't know if it was from Avon, and we don't know UID worked for Avon (could have been a present)
UID has brown hair and MP is blond. So, not a match.About the hair color...not sure, but you are probably right.
Yes.They have her DNA in Namus and also from Jane Doe.
"demonstration tube of "Pagoda" lipstick (Avon)" so, the Pagoda lipstick is from Avon. Written black and white in the case report.
For the present, maybe.
But Avon is a lead for finding out who is UID, no matter who is she actually.
Donnis has lipstick, we don't know which, but I doubt she had Avon lipstick.
1) Avon is only sold through party-plan selling. You must be overage to be a client or a rep. So, a 15yo with Avon is way too young !!
2) If it's a present, why not. But I lean more towards buying it in a store, with her own money. In this case, Avon is the unlikeliest brand of lipstick she would carry because Avon can't be sold in stores.
UID has brown hair and MP is blond. So, not a match.
Yes.
However, there are 2 types of DNA: nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA.
Nuclear DNA is found in cell egg, and results in 50%sperm-50%egg. That's the most well known.
Mitochondrial is another story though. More about mitochondrial DNA : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA (I know, I know, Wikipedia :-/ )
This picture sums it up : http://undsci.berkeley.edu/search/imagedetail.php?id=175&topic_id=&keywords=
The fact that both have DNA is not enough.
If you have a MP's mitochondrial DNA while you have IUD's nuclear DNA in the database, it won't match even if they are indeed the same person.
It's akin adding euros with rands for budgeting : won't work because you need to work with the same currency. Or akin giving carrots instead of cabbage...
For a reliable match, you need the same DNA type : either both mitochondrial DNA, or nuclear DNA.
See what I try to explain ?
No specific ads because they were sold only at selling-parties. No ads is actually very normal ��Keep calm and an have an open mind. We are not understanding each other right.... yes UID had a demonstration tube of Avon. We don't know if she was working for Avon, I think she was a client or get this test tube as a present. I search all over Internet today for Avon Pagoda, and when it came into production. Old advertisements, vintage stuff on E-bay etc. Still can't make a certain conclusion.....Saw some vintage lipstick Avon Pagoda with a design from even the 30's....I think it's a standard color, no specific advertisement so far from the period UID died. I think it's a color red....nothing to go on....
If my memory serves correctly, you didn't dye your hair blond at 15yo.About Donnis, we can discuss if she was naturally blond or not....we don't know...to little info about this girl and her missing circumstances.