I believe the affair story is true, so please understand that my comments are coming from that viewpoint.
BC's statements have me wondering "what was he thinking?" Of course, In his original statement he denied that GA made the accident statement and then went on to throw 'dirt' on both sisters. I said in a post, somewhere, that he would have been better off using the 'we won't dignify this with a response' line. Well, he went even further and I was stunned when I heard he stated that George denies an affair ever happened. He has been their lawyer since 12/08 - he must be able to read both of them by now. I can't help but feel he HAS to know that GA is lying! How far does someone's attorney go when dealing with something like this. OK, I know he can't make a statement like, "George said to tell you all it's a lie, but I don't believe him", but shouldn't he have counseled them to say either nothing, or something else? If, in the future, I am looking for a lawyer, I am not going to pick the guy who looked like a fool on national TV.
If, on the other hand, GA is a better actor than I ever imagined he was, and he has fooled BC, what will BC do when the proof is presented? Will he walk away from both Anthonys? Will he offer to still represent CA, but cut GA loose? How could he possibly still be willing to represent someone who made him look bad in front of millions of people? Will he be willing to put his career of practicing law in this area on the line for them?
I think BC has some serious thinking to do in the next few weeks, I really do.