Baby Lisa's half brothers being interviewed Nov. 10

[TheDuchess]

Why would they remove them from the home? The FBI does not do that. If CPS was going to remove them from the home they could have done that any time.

 

[flipflop]

hmmm boys didn't come home with parents

That makes me believe that they

a) went home with another family member to avoid media....
but as a parent would you not want to be with the boys for emotional support after being grilled with questions about their missing sister.
This theory does not make sense to me.

b) the boys were handed over to CPS

c) I have no idea!!! anyone else have an idea???????

 

[flipflop]

Why would they remove them from the home? The FBI does not do that. If CPS was going to remove them from the home they could have done that any time.

makes you think that the boys revealed something that required CPS to be called in and remove them from the parents. JMO

 

[PlainJaneDoe]

Sending good thoughts to the boys tonight...I imagine this is not easy for them.

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

Why would they remove them from the home? The FBI does not do that. If CPS was going to remove them from the home they could have done that any time.

Perhaps CPS sent a representative to the FBI interview to watch the proceedings. jmo

 

[Abby Normal]

When did the boys start interviewing? I was at the grocery store when I read Spellman's tweet, so I'm thinking around 5?

5-9 would have been a lengthy interview, no?

Maybe (knock on wood) the parents had an interview too, and as such the boys went home with grandparents when they were done at 7. =P

 

[Abby Normal]

With DHS/CPS SOP says a court hearing happens first to determine if the kids should be removed, but in the case of apparent risk of imminent danger, you can remove them first and have the hearing second. So if they removed them it wasn't for drinking that night, it was for some justifiable concern of imminent danger. I think that is unlikely, but certainly not out of the realm of possibility.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

When did the boys start interviewing? I was at the grocery store when I read Spellman's tweet, so I'm thinking around 5?

5-9 would have been a lengthy interview, no?

Maybe (knock on wood) the parents had an interview too, and as such the boys went home with grandparents when they were done at 7. =P

It doesn't sound like they interviewed the parents according to this:

"JHoltFox4KC John Holt
#LisaIrwin half-bros finish interviews. Family attorney says family relieved and cooperating. No interviews with parents set. #Fox4News@9"

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7339100&postcount=168"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - MSM coverage of Baby Lisa 11/10/11[/ame]

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

With DHS/CPS SOP says a court hearing happens first to determine if the kids should be removed, but in the case of apparent risk of imminent danger, you can remove them first and have the hearing second. So if they removed them it wasn't for drinking that night, it was for some justifiable concern of imminent danger. I think that is unlikely, but certainly not out of the realm of possibility.

How about if one or both of the boys tell FBI interviewer, "I'm/We're not supposed to say anything about what happened to Lisa because our Mom/Dad will be very angry with us"? Would that be sufficient cause for removal? jmo

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

I want to (and keep trying to) think of a logical, benign explanation for why the parents came home without the boys. We've listed a few possibilities here but it doesn't seem any of them fit both of those categories.

 

[AlmostGone]

Media would be watching where the boys are... I'd think? Right?

 

[Jaxson]

I can think of lots of logical and benign reasons...the first being maybe they were brought home before the parents and media didn't catch it.

 

[Wendy101]

This is great news!

I want to (and keep trying to) think of a logical, benign explanation for why the parents came home without the boys. We've listed a few possibilities here but it doesn't seem any of them fit both of those categories.

I just hope that IF CPS had the feeling they needed to protect these boys, that the boys are atleast with other family memebers - they have been through enough.

 

[Abby Normal]

It could just be that they think they are protecting the boys by letting them sleep at Grandma's and not have to come home to the media buzz when the media is obviously trying to get pictures to go with "boys questioned", where the boys would be the focus. That is logical and benign. It could be more. I'm sure we'll know soon though.

 

[Jaxson]

I thought the location of the interviews was unknown...I haven't seen media report a location and I am relatively sure that neither LE or the attorneys would want the media watching those boys.

 

[Pensfan]

Pure speculation...

Someone else took the boys home, when their interviews were finished,, to have them avoid media

Perhaps the parents stayed back for a bit to talk with the atty, then he gave them a ride home

I doubt it since the parents happily let the media follow them around on
Halloween.

 

[Pensfan]

It could just be that they think they are protecting the boys by letting them sleep at Grandma's and not have to come home to the media buzz when the media is obviously trying to get pictures to go with "boys questioned", where the boys would be the focus. That is logical and benign. It could be more. I'm sure we'll know soon though.

This is a mom that drank 5-10 glasses of wine while nobody was watching the kids or the young baby. Nope.

 

[Pensfan]

I just hope that IF CPS had the feeling they needed to protect these boys, that the boys are atleast with other family memebers - they have been through enough.

Maybe this is why Deborah and Jeremy returned to the bro's home. Maybe CPS said the the parents cannot be near the kids so the kids are at the grandparents. I wish they could go visit Hazel.

 

[Pensfan]

Why would they remove them from the home? The FBI does not do that. If CPS was going to remove them from the home they could have done that any time.

If one of the boys told the investigator that mommy frequently blacked out after drinking that red liquid, smoked a funny glass pipe sometimes, ate pills like candy, threw the baby up against the wall, slapped them, and etc....CPS would be immediately called.

 

[AlmostGone]

maybe they just need more time with the boys and they don't want their investigation to be tainted and they will start again in the morning? So they keep the boys for now?