Baez Files 8 Motions In Case

[Diamond]

I think he's showing his ignorance again. Seems like most of these docs deal with charges to come, not charges filed. And I don't think he can get the stuff that deals with an ongoing investigation. And the ZG docs? Wonder why he thinks the OCSO will help he in a civil case???

I agree, it seems like he wants stuff that relates to a possible future charge and I highly doubt he can get that before it's time.

 

[krimekat]

They are only entitled to evidence for charges filing regarding neglect and theft. They are not entitled to evidence for charges not filed yet for possible homicide.... so it depends on the charges as to what defense is entitled to

I think Baez is putting his cart in front of his horses wanting ANYTHING more than the charges against her . . . shows what a newbie atty he really is!

 

[liltigress]

It's mentioned a couple times, but here it is on page 6 of 21:

"WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Defendant respectfully moves this honorable court to enter an order allowing the defense expert access to inspect, test, and photograph the de.fendanfs vehicle and its components and parts, including but not limited to examination of the vehicle from a "lift", in preparation for trial."

He's looking for squirrels?...

 

[liltigress]

She wants to travel. So the home confinement is getting a bit too much for her.

Geez! She had 31 days to look for Caylee. She didn't bother looking.

Why don't she just tell LE where she dumped Caylee and save a lot of people a lot of time.

 

[Seranade]

Also wanted to throw in my two cents on this...JB sure is concerned with the media, huh? He bad mouths them at every chance he gets! Even in something that should be formal, such as a motion, he gives his opinions on the media and how they've handled this case. He sure knows how to make an of himself! :waitasec:

These are put up or shut up motions, which he should have filed weeks ago. Either they have the evidence to charge her, in which case they should do so, or they do not in which case they should shut up about leaking evidence to the media (ie, the jury pool) they are not willing to show anyone.

 

[Samijeansg]

I really can't wait until Friday to see what Judge Strickland does with all these motions. I will be glued to the T.V. and probably rolling with laughter at his comments!

 

[Nosey Parker]

I think what he's trying to do is put the squeeze on the DA to quickly decide what evidence comes in for the Neglect trial, and what they will keep back for possible murder trial. Just trying to rush them in the hopes they will make a mistake in the presentation. And my thinking is that if the prosecution presents certain evidence in the Neglect, and then bring it up again in the Murder, he's hoping that will be regarded as double jeopardy - hence a Murder mistrial.

As for the travel request, bet they figure it's worth a try. After all, she did miss that PR vacation from lack of stolen funds.

 

[tiredofthis]

He's looking for squirrels?...

:clap::clap::clap:

Coffee just went all over my screen!

 

[shadow of my mind]

Sarcasm on >Ok, Did I miss something. Has Casey been charged with anything more than economic crimes and child neglect? Sounds to me like JB needs some clues as to what future charges are going to be and what they have to charge her with. The car one is interesting. It was ‘given’ to her. Well how come it is not in her name then. Registration proves ownership and Casey’s name isn’t on it. What is up with the inclusion of being able to put the car on a ‘lift?' JB has hired an expert to test the car. Who is footing the bill? And what is with the whining about the media all about.
Cart before the horse syndrome or is this an attempt to dazzle the prosecution with JB&#8217;s agile abilities in citing state statues and case law. < Sarcasm off

 

[not_my_kids]

You don't file a motion for DCF records, the person named as suspected abuser goes in and files a paper asking fo the records. Federal law. Abuser has a right to those records. As do any children named in the report.
Duh, JB.

 

[luvmy4brats]

Baez should invest in a wheelbarrow to carry all these motions.

And hipwaders to walk thru all this cr*p

 

[Samijeansg]

Sarcasm on >Ok, Did I miss something. Has Casey been charged with anything more than economic crimes and child neglect? Sounds to me like JB needs some clues as to what future charges are going to be and what they have to charge her with. The car one is interesting. It was ‘given’ to her. Well how come it is not in her name then. Registration proves ownership and Casey’s name isn’t on it. What is up with the inclusion of being able to put the car on a ‘lift?' JB has hired an expert to test the car. Who is footing the bill? And what is with the whining about the media all about.
Cart before the horse syndrome or is this an attempt to dazzle the prosecution with JB’s agile abilities in citing state statues and case law. < Sarcasm off

:clap::blowkiss:

 

[Seranade]

Sorry to quote myself, but this:

These are put up or shut up motions, which he should have filed weeks ago. Either they have the evidence to charge her, in which case they should do so, or they do not in which case they should shut up about leaking evidence to the media (ie, the jury pool) they are not willing to show anyone.

...was supposed to be a response to this post:

They are only entitled to evidence for charges filing regarding neglect and theft. They are not entitled to evidence for charges not filed yet for possible homicide.... so it depends on the charges as to what defense is entitled to

 

[Can't Sleep]

He's looking for squirrels?...

LMAO. Completely broke down and laughed tears here. Thanks for that astute one-liner! I needed a laugh SO BAD.

 

[Short_Stuff]

I do believe it's a law that Baez is entitled to see evidence IF that evidence applies to the charges at hand. So they will let him see some or all, not sure how much.
On the traveling issue, should be denied! If they let Casey travel anywhere, they're nutts!

 

[liltigress]

:clap::clap::clap:

Coffee just went all over my screen!

LOL.. Ooops Sorry!

Wasn't that obvious though? I'm still snickering.

 

[Spangle]

It's mentioned a couple times, but here it is on page 6 of 21:

"&#65279;WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Defendant respectfully moves this honorable court to enter an order allowing the defense expert access to inspect, test, and photograph the de.fendanfs vehicle and its components and parts, including but not limited to examination of the vehicle from a "lift", in preparation for trial."

Thanks for searching for it.

Wonder what it has to do with regarding neglect and theft.

Can't get get introuble for filing stupid things??

 

[shadow of my mind]

They want to place the car on a lift? Telling information here? Perhaps they feel someone ran over Caylee? or are they still looking for squirell evidence?

I was wondering about that also. A few things come to mind but I need to do some reading.

 

[Can't Sleep]

"Motion to allow Defendant to travel to places of interest."

Does anyone know what this means? "Places of interest?" Of interest to whom? KC? Like "Let's all go to Busch Gardens next weekend?" Or, "Let's all go to an Anything But Clothes Party at Lake Vag next weekend?"

Or is it more like, "Let's lemme' run out here where TES is planning to search and grab me a little duffle bag real quick..." Or, "My gut feeling is that she is close...real close...getting warm...getting warmer...hot...red hot...OMG, CAYLEEEEEE! I had no idea! Somebody feel real sorry for me now."

I know I'm getting sarcastic as H*LL but how else to deal with this? Places of interest? Hmmm...the art museum is interesting. Could mean anywhere.

 

[Ocean Lover]

JB complains that LE 'successfully tried a homicide case against the defendant in public eye'. He wants every document which media and public has...no problem! GO AND READ ALL PUBLISHED documents/video/audio which 'public eye' has! it's free and available without any motions...what to complain about??

Regarding motion to allow Casey to freely travel, guess what? if it would be up to me, I would allow this with only one correction: THE DATE AND TIME OF SUCH TRAVEL WILL BE MADE PUBLIC!!!! And we'll see how far she'll travel 'inconditionally'...

Even if she did get to go visit places of interest they had better put a bullet proof vest on her as someone as sick as her may lose it. Even if it's not public knowledge I'm sure the media will find out when and where she will go.