Belgium - Balen - Heidi De Schepper - 26yo- missing since 2010, only found out she’s missing in 2024

Carovb5

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
682
Reaction score
4,297
Heidi De Schepper, a young mother from Balen, has been missing since 2010, but the police only discovered this last year. No one reported the disappearance of the then 26-year-old woman, not even her boyfriend.

At the time of her disappearance, Heidi was 26 years old. She lived with her boyfriend in a rented house in a quiet street in Balen. Together they had three sons aged 2, 3 and 7. Heidi did not have a job, she took care of the household and the children: "As a result, she actually had few social contacts in Balen," says Aerts.”
“She didn’t have any contact with her family anymore.”

Her disappearance was noticed by a school of one of her kids trying to contact her.
Belgian press, in Dutch
Politie ontdekt per toeval dat jonge mama Heidi (26) uit Balen al 14 jaar vermist is: “Zelfs haar vriend deed nooit aangifte”

Belgian Police

heidi4
 
Such an odd story. The fact that her ID card was never renewed, she would also have to declare her taxes, and that was probably never done (or done for her). Surely that should set off alarm bells at the municipality and the government, but didn't? Also, her child was 7 at the time of the disappearance, it must have experienced the disappearance relatively consciously, right? I wonder what was said to that child. Because the school also appeared to be unaware of the disappearance or the mother not being in the picture, did the child never mention it, or why did the school still get the Heidi's contact information? So many questions…
 
Article: Why the disappearance of Heidi De Schepper is very reminiscent of another case: ‘In 2008, she disappeared in Balen. She was never heard from again either’

The disappearance of Heidi De Schepper went unnoticed for 14 years, which nevertheless raises questions. No one seemed to miss the then 26-year-old mum of three young children. Crime journalist Faroek Özgünes answers the main questions and links them to another disappearance case with very striking similarities. ‘She too suddenly disappeared, took everything with her and nothing was heard from her since 2008. And: it happened barely a few kilometres from where Heidi was already living at the time.’

Why did Heidi De Schepper's disappearance stay under the radar for so long?

Faroek Özgünes: ‘Heidi had few social contacts outside her family in Balen. She did not work outside the home and her social life was mainly limited to taking care of her children and running errands. She had also cut off any contact with her family, which may explain why no one seemed to miss her. Official bodies also failed to notice that she never exchanged her provisional driving licence for a full licence and did not renew her identity card after 2011.’

How did her disappearance come to light after all?

‘Not through her immediate surroundings, because her partner, for instance, never reported her disappearance. He claims she was suddenly gone one day with all her belongings. But the school of one of her children reported. The school tried to contact Heidi, but discovered she appeared untraceable and informed the local police. An investigation was then launched.’

What could have happened to Heidi De Schepper?

‘The police are investigating several scenarios: she may have started a new life somewhere else. This could explain why she has not contacted her family or friends all these years and why she has not renewed official documents. Another slope is that Heidi may have committed an act of desperation. Her difficult childhood and isolated life may have played a role. As the circumstances of her disappearance are unclear, the police also do not rule out the possibility that criminal acts were involved.’

What do the police hope to achieve with the investigative report?

‘The police want to get a better picture of Heidi's life, personality and social contacts. Thus, they hope to know more about her daily routine, her relationships and any problems she had. Hence the appeal to people who knew Heidi, saw her or spoke to her after 2010 to get in touch. This includes possible friends from the nightlife in Amsterdam, parents of other school children with whom she may have spoken and other people who saw her regularly.’

This case is reminiscent of another disappearance case, that of Annie De Poortere. Are there any similarities?

‘At first glance, the two cases do seem similar, but it is still a very different case. Especially because Annie's disappearance was indeed reported and investigated at the time. Annie De Poortere disappeared on Saturday 12 November 1994 without taking anything of value with her. The 48-year-old woman was struggling with psychological problems, her husband and son testified five years later on the VTM detection programme ‘Oproep 2020’. An act of desperation by a depressed woman was not ruled out at the time of her disappearance. A murder scenario was not a privileged route for the court.’

‘Meanwhile, we know better. The old disappearance case became a murder investigation when Annie's bodily remains were found under a neighbour's terrace in Sint-Martens-Latem last year. Her husband subsequently made partial statements - according to him, he found his wife at home after a suicide and made up the disappearance story to spare himself the shame - but is not being prosecuted further because the 30-year-old case is time-barred.’

How exceptional are such sudden disappearances?

‘It obviously happens very rarely that someone can just disappear unnoticed for as long as Heidi De Schepper. But strangely enough, during the same period and barely a few kilometres away, Sigrid Dormaels disappeared. She was last seen on 18 February 2008. That Monday morning, Sigrid is said to have packed her bags at her friend's house in Balen - or better: in the borough of Olmen - and was never seen again. Witnesses say she may have been picked up by someone with a van. All her pets also disappeared; an English bulldog and some kind of Maltese, her cat, a ferret, a hamster and some cages with zebra finches and parakeets. Her car, a blue Nissan Micra, was later recovered.’

‘A witness mentioned that Sigrid possibly had a new boyfriend in West Flanders, but that new boyfriend - like Sigrid - was never found. As recently as November last year, police searched again for traces of Sigrid, in the garden of her then boyfriend Rudi N. in Olmen. That search yielded nothing, so Sigrid's disappearance still remains a mystery.’
 
This is such a bizarre story. Were questions not asked from schools when she never attended parents nights etc ? I wonder why her young kids never asked about her, or were they conditioned not to ask ? Just my opinion, but seems like she may have been in a controlling relationship, just the fact she never seemed to have a social life and had lost contact with her family: I hope there are answers soon for her children and estranged family.
 
EXCLUSIVE. Ex-partner of missing Heidi De Schepper breaks the silence: ‘Her situation only got worse, I couldn't take it anymore’

‘Whether Heidi is still alive? No idea. I think she is in Spain.’ We are at the front door of N., the ex-partner of the missing Heidi De Schepper from Balen. He was arrested on Monday and questioned for hours about the mother of his children, who disappeared without a trace in 2010. He talks unfiltered about the beginning of their relationship, the last time he saw her ánd her difficulties: ‘I had put her to the choice: choose for the children and stop doing drugs or leave.’

N. shuffles a little nervously when he sees us standing at his front door. We ask him if he is Heidi De Schepper's ex-partner. ‘That's right,’ he says. We too are wary, having already spent several hours walking around Balen. Our tour started in Langvennen, where he and Heidi rented a cottage. Meanwhile, the house has already been razed to the ground and the landlord has built a new residence there. He would not speak to us. His partner briefly names the situation of N.'s family: ’It took a lot of judges to get him out. It was problematic.’ Other local residents also confirm that story. One of them warns himself: ‘He is a dangerous man with a lot of problems and a short fuse. I won't be mentioned, will I? I don't want him to come and see me.’

No handcuffs
Here at the garden gate, N. seems no threat at all. With a juicy Kempen accent and sports clothes of the same shade of grey as his hair, he speaks to us. He wants to clarify some things after the communication from the federal police, share his version of the story. ‘The CLB (student support centre) initiated all this,’ he says. ‘Last year, one of my sons had played truant. They had tried to call the mother but couldn't get contact and found that suspicious. So they notified the police, behind my back. And then they came on Monday with the big guns, it was unbelievable.’

‘I was walking my dog. The police had already knocked on my parents' door - who live a little further away - saying: “We are looking for N., because he has fled and I know a lot.” When I got home, there were all anonymous cars parked. I thought to myself: what is all this? They came to search my house. They took me to the office, I was interrogated for nine hours. That was not normal. The whole time the camera is there on you, they put pressure on you and suddenly they want all the info, all the exact times (sigh). Look, I left without handcuffs, I thought that was already a good one.’

No report
But then why did it stay quiet around her disappearance for years? ‘I know Heidi through and through, which is why I didn't make a report when she disappeared,’ says N. ’If she feels hunted, she will only flee further away. I knew: if you wanted to get something done with her, you had to give her space.’ Five minutes into the conversation, he returns to this and apparently did report her absence to ‘the child support fund’ in the two months following her disappearance. In the end, it does not become clear what steps N. would have actually taken to report her disappearance.

We return to the moment they met. That too is a somewhat disjointed and, to say the least, peculiar story. At the time N. met Heidi through her father, she was still a minor. ‘She was having a very hard time,’ says N. ’I was the only one who still cared about her and went to visit her in institutions several times. When she turned 18, she became my foster daughter and moved in with us, in the house on Langvennen. We lived there for quite a long time anyway. Her big dream was to move to the Ardennes, to do something with horses. She rode horses as a child and that love never disappeared. Unfortunately, nothing came of it.’

Drugs
He begins to cry softly. He talks about how Heidi would have had difficulties with drugs. ‘Her situation only got worse. I just couldn't take it anymore and had put her before a choice. Either you choose your children or you choose that 🤬🤬🤬🤬. At the end of my working day, I was just scared to come home, scared for my children. Because what will I find there again? The mum comatose in the sofa, the drugs still on the table. She used speed, because she wanted to lose weight. Once she was hospitalised because she only weighed 35 kilos ... Nothing is said about that by the police, lol! And I find that very bad. That way I come across as the bogeyman, while I did so much for her.’

‘She had a double life filled with drugs and going out. I also saw talk of that other disappearance in Balen. (Sigrid Dormaels disappeared in Balen in 2008, ed.) Another one. Then I ask myself a question: would they have known each other? We don't know.’ N. pauses. ‘This affects everyone. Above all, I want to protect my family, which is why I am speaking to you anonymously. My children still searched for her, I even helped. But yes, at some point that also ends. They said: ‘If she is still alive, she is welcome for a chat. But she will never be a part of our lives again.' And I understand that too.’

‘It became too much’
‘On one hand, she was the perfect mum, even making the fruit and vegetable porridges for our two-year-old son. But once the household chores were done, it was time for her moment: drugs. And that became too much.’ N. recounts the last moments he saw Heidi. But what follows becomes vague. ‘We went to the GP, there she acknowledged for the first time that she had a ‘working point’. Between that moment and the last time I saw her, there were seven days. Days in which Heidi did not speak to me again. A week later, she came to drop the children off at my parents' house. It was on a Friday, the day when chips were always eaten. The children came from school, on the table the fries were already ready. She left back. To where? No idea.’

It was the last time anyone saw Heidi. When we ask him when that was, what year or month, he struggles. ‘No idea, I don't remember all that. I had a bad motorbike accident, since then I have lost a piece of my film.’ N.'s phone vibrates. ‘Ah see, again of that. My phone won't stand still today.’ N. wants to go back inside to his sons. Meanwhile, we are an hour on and the mystery is as big as ever. Whether the Heidi case will ever get solved? No one knows. But if she is somewhere, alive and well, reading and seeing what her disappearance still triggers even after 14 years, she might respond anyway. ‘I doubt that,’ concludes N.
 
EXCLUSIVE. Ex-partner of missing Heidi De Schepper breaks the silence: ‘Her situation only got worse, I couldn't take it anymore’

‘Whether Heidi is still alive? No idea. I think she is in Spain.’ We are at the front door of N., the ex-partner of the missing Heidi De Schepper from Balen. He was arrested on Monday and questioned for hours about the mother of his children, who disappeared without a trace in 2010. He talks unfiltered about the beginning of their relationship, the last time he saw her ánd her difficulties: ‘I had put her to the choice: choose for the children and stop doing drugs or leave.’

N. shuffles a little nervously when he sees us standing at his front door. We ask him if he is Heidi De Schepper's ex-partner. ‘That's right,’ he says. We too are wary, having already spent several hours walking around Balen. Our tour started in Langvennen, where he and Heidi rented a cottage. Meanwhile, the house has already been razed to the ground and the landlord has built a new residence there. He would not speak to us. His partner briefly names the situation of N.'s family: ’It took a lot of judges to get him out. It was problematic.’ Other local residents also confirm that story. One of them warns himself: ‘He is a dangerous man with a lot of problems and a short fuse. I won't be mentioned, will I? I don't want him to come and see me.’

No handcuffs
Here at the garden gate, N. seems no threat at all. With a juicy Kempen accent and sports clothes of the same shade of grey as his hair, he speaks to us. He wants to clarify some things after the communication from the federal police, share his version of the story. ‘The CLB (student support centre) initiated all this,’ he says. ‘Last year, one of my sons had played truant. They had tried to call the mother but couldn't get contact and found that suspicious. So they notified the police, behind my back. And then they came on Monday with the big guns, it was unbelievable.’

‘I was walking my dog. The police had already knocked on my parents' door - who live a little further away - saying: “We are looking for N., because he has fled and I know a lot.” When I got home, there were all anonymous cars parked. I thought to myself: what is all this? They came to search my house. They took me to the office, I was interrogated for nine hours. That was not normal. The whole time the camera is there on you, they put pressure on you and suddenly they want all the info, all the exact times (sigh). Look, I left without handcuffs, I thought that was already a good one.’

No report
But then why did it stay quiet around her disappearance for years? ‘I know Heidi through and through, which is why I didn't make a report when she disappeared,’ says N. ’If she feels hunted, she will only flee further away. I knew: if you wanted to get something done with her, you had to give her space.’ Five minutes into the conversation, he returns to this and apparently did report her absence to ‘the child support fund’ in the two months following her disappearance. In the end, it does not become clear what steps N. would have actually taken to report her disappearance.

We return to the moment they met. That too is a somewhat disjointed and, to say the least, peculiar story. At the time N. met Heidi through her father, she was still a minor. ‘She was having a very hard time,’ says N. ’I was the only one who still cared about her and went to visit her in institutions several times. When she turned 18, she became my foster daughter and moved in with us, in the house on Langvennen. We lived there for quite a long time anyway. Her big dream was to move to the Ardennes, to do something with horses. She rode horses as a child and that love never disappeared. Unfortunately, nothing came of it.’

Drugs
He begins to cry softly. He talks about how Heidi would have had difficulties with drugs. ‘Her situation only got worse. I just couldn't take it anymore and had put her before a choice. Either you choose your children or you choose that *advertiser censored*. At the end of my working day, I was just scared to come home, scared for my children. Because what will I find there again? The mum comatose in the sofa, the drugs still on the table. She used speed, because she wanted to lose weight. Once she was hospitalised because she only weighed 35 kilos ... Nothing is said about that by the police, lol! And I find that very bad. That way I come across as the bogeyman, while I did so much for her.’

‘She had a double life filled with drugs and going out. I also saw talk of that other disappearance in Balen. (Sigrid Dormaels disappeared in Balen in 2008, ed.) Another one. Then I ask myself a question: would they have known each other? We don't know.’ N. pauses. ‘This affects everyone. Above all, I want to protect my family, which is why I am speaking to you anonymously. My children still searched for her, I even helped. But yes, at some point that also ends. They said: ‘If she is still alive, she is welcome for a chat. But she will never be a part of our lives again.' And I understand that too.’

‘It became too much’
‘On one hand, she was the perfect mum, even making the fruit and vegetable porridges for our two-year-old son. But once the household chores were done, it was time for her moment: drugs. And that became too much.’ N. recounts the last moments he saw Heidi. But what follows becomes vague. ‘We went to the GP, there she acknowledged for the first time that she had a ‘working point’. Between that moment and the last time I saw her, there were seven days. Days in which Heidi did not speak to me again. A week later, she came to drop the children off at my parents' house. It was on a Friday, the day when chips were always eaten. The children came from school, on the table the fries were already ready. She left back. To where? No idea.’

It was the last time anyone saw Heidi. When we ask him when that was, what year or month, he struggles. ‘No idea, I don't remember all that. I had a bad motorbike accident, since then I have lost a piece of my film.’ N.'s phone vibrates. ‘Ah see, again of that. My phone won't stand still today.’ N. wants to go back inside to his sons. Meanwhile, we are an hour on and the mystery is as big as ever. Whether the Heidi case will ever get solved? No one knows. But if she is somewhere, alive and well, reading and seeing what her disappearance still triggers even after 14 years, she might respond anyway. ‘I doubt that,’ concludes N.
He was her foster father first? Yuk!! How old is he?
 
rond diezelfde periode is op een paar kilometer afstand ook Sigrid Dormaels verdwenen. Misschien een verband? Of zou de partner er iets mee te maken hebben?
Translation :
Around the same period, Sigrid Dormaels also disappeared a few kilometers away. Maybe a connection? Or could the partner have something to do with it?
 
He was her foster father first? Yuk!! How old is he?
Heidi was 26 when she went missing, and at that point her oldest child was 7.

N. became Heidi’s foster father when she was 18, and then they had a child together when she was around 19. very disturbing.


this article mentions that N. told an acquaintance that Heidi had gone back to Antwerp, which is different from what he is saying now. he comes across as very shady. i wonder if he set their children up against her, making them think she left because she didn’t care about them or something like that. jmoo.
 
Heidi was 26 when she went missing, and at that point her oldest child was 7.

N. became Heidi’s foster father when she was 18, and then they had a child together when she was around 19. very disturbing.


this article mentions that N. told an acquaintance that Heidi had gone back to Antwerp, which is different from what he is saying now. he comes across as very shady. i wonder if he set their children up against her, making them think she left because she didn’t care about them or something like that. jmoo.
Kids tell a lot while playing & while talking about different subjects (when they don’t have the feeling it’s about the subject they can’t talk about), often at school/hobbies and mostly to other kids. I hope their classmates etc remember their talks & will speak up.
Kids notice, hear & feel more than adults think, so there might be some information there, let’s hope so!!
 
Heidi De Schepper was already struck off ex officio shortly after disappearance in 2010: administratively, ‘the woman no longer existed’

Heidi De Schepper, the woman whose disappearance remained under the radar for 14 years, had already been removed from office in November 2010. That is what the mayor of Balen, Sofie Leysen (CD&V), told VRT NWS. This means that administratively, the woman ‘no longer existed’ in our country. It does not lessen the mystery.

How can you disappear for 14 years without anyone seeming to notice? That remains the big question in the Heidi De Schepper case - besides the question of what happened to the young woman, of course.

On 6 May 2010, a provisional driving licence was still collected in her name - whether that was by herself or someone else is not clear. After that: nothing. That provisional driving licence was never converted into a permanent one, her expired identity card was never renewed.

Now it turns out that the woman had already been officially removed in November 2010. VRT NWS knows this through the current mayor of Balen, Sofie Leysen. According to the mayor, after all this time, it is not possible to find out how this happened then. Someone - but who is not clear - had established that Heidi De Schepper was no longer staying at the address where she normally lived.

‘The file doesn't allow us to dig that up yet, it's only kept for a few years,’ says Leysen. ‘So we can't comment on the trigger. It could be done by a partner, by a landlord, by new owners… I suspect it is difficult to find out yet. It may well be that the police still have some documents, I dare not comment on that.’

Such an official deletion does not happen just like that, by the way; it is always preceded by an investigation by the police. It must have established that she was effectively no longer living at the address given. At the same time, it must have been judged at that time that it was not an alarming disappearance.

‘An assessment is made at that point, whether the explanation is plausible. Based on that, there will be further investigation or the file will be closed. After such a deletion, the administrative part of the municipality stops.’

What does such an ex officio deletion mean? In short: that you no longer exist administratively in our country, that you are removed from the population register. This happens if you do not reside at the address where you are registered for more than six months and if they do not know where you live.

The consequences of such a removal are not minor: your identity card is no longer valid, there are problems with insurance and the bank, you no longer receive summons letters, etc.

The deletion does explain why agencies like the bank, or the municipality did not sound the alarm. Yet it remains remarkable that nobody ever missed the young woman, that nobody questioned where she suddenly was.

Twenty tips to police already
‘It is indeed a finding that we have come across in the investigation,’ says Kristof Aerts of the Antwerp public prosecutor's office. ‘It is certain that she has been removed from office, that is part of the investigation. At the moment, it is more important to know where she is now. So it is object of the investigation, but it is not decisive.’

Meanwhile, the police have received around 20 tips about the woman's disappearance. ‘The tips mainly come from people who used to know her. The investigators are now working to see if it yields anything,’ he echoed. In terms of content, he does not comment on the tips. ‘Those are now being analysed in full,’ he says.

But, to be clear: ‘There is no breakthrough yet’. He therefore stresses that it remains important to share information with the police.
 
Heidi De Schepper's (26) ex-partner suddenly remembers more: “I kept her worst photos to show the children”

The ex-partner of the missing Heidi De Schepper (26) has made new statements, in front of the camera at Faroek. Yesterday, in an interview with HLN, he said he no longer remembered exactly when Heidi disappeared. "But it was in June, just before the summer holidays in 2010," he says now. No one ever reported the young mother missing. And three months later, Heidi was officially removed from the list, which meant that government agencies did not suspect anything either.

He told their children that, too. He even kept drugs that he said Heidi had left behind. “I kept bags for a while to show them what their mommy was doing,” he says. “Like pictures of when she was at her worst. You know, in all the pictures, their mommy was smiling and happy. She was always glowing. So they can’t reconcile those pictures with the story about their mom and the drugs. That’s why I kept those other pictures, too. So they can understand.”
Ex-partner van Heidi De Schepper (26) herinnert zich plots meer: “Ik heb haar slechtste foto’s bewaard om aan de kinderen te tonen”
 
Volgens mij heeft haar partner er iets mee te
rond diezelfde periode is op een paar kilometer afstand ook Sigrid Dormaels verdwenen. Misschien een verband? Of zou de partner er iets mee te maken hebben?

rond diezelfde periode is op een paar kilometer afstand ook Sigrid Dormaels verdwenen. Misschien een verband? Of zou de partner er iets mee te maken
 
Alain Remue (Belgian missing person unit) on disappearance of Heidi De Schepper: ‘My gut says: something happened that is not okay’

‘It is a very exceptional case’. This statement on the disappearance of Heidi De Schepper, 14 years ago today, may have echoed in many Flemish living rooms in recent days. But this time it comes from the mouth of Alain Remue, head of the Missing Persons Unit. ‘I have been at the Missing Persons Unit for almost 30 years and have never experienced someone being gone for so long, but above all: that no one seems to miss her.’

What happened to Heidi De Schepper is still a mystery. ‘We are working hard on this case, but at the moment we have no idea in which direction it will go. We are looking at all possible avenues. I have learned in my job not to rule anything out, in all the years I have been doing this. In the Missing Persons Unit, ‘never say never’ is also the slogan. It could still go either way, but right now we have no idea where to really look for it.’

Remue, too, finds the case strange: ‘I have been in the Missing Persons Unit for almost 30 years now and have never experienced someone being gone for such a long time, but above all: that no one seems to miss her. We've already had cases where someone was missing for a long time and our searches yielded no results, and that person turned out to be alive afterwards, somewhere else in the world. I'm not ruling that out here either, it's possible. But for someone not to be missed for such a long time, that is something else’.

‘My gut says: not OK’
Speaking to VRT, he added: ‘’We also wonder how it is possible for someone to be removed from the National Register. My experience tells me: a mum doesn't just leave her children behind. That should make us think. Something has happened that is not okay. That's my feeling, based on my experience.’

Remue cannot say much else about the case. ‘In the investigation notice, we also sent out the request to the lady in question to give sign of life. We also don't want to rule out the possibility that she was moving somewhere else.’ His team is also now compiling a profile of the woman, which may help in the investigation.
 
Zijn drie kinderen verbleven vijf jaar lang in een instelling. “Ik heb moeten vechten om ze terug bij mij te krijgen”, gaat hij emotioneel verder. “Mensen wantrouwden mij, sinds de verdwijning van Heidi. Wat moet ik daar tegen doen? Ik weet van mezelf dat ik de waarheid spreek.”
His three children were in an institution for five years. “I had to fight to get them back to me,” he continues emotionally. “People distrusted me, since Heidi disappeared. What can I do about that? I know that I tell the truth.”
(English version provided by Google Translate)

The kids were taken away from him for 5 years after Heidi disappeared? So someone must have known she was missing right? I hope someone familiar with Dutch can elaborate on the translation because I'm confused.
 


(English version provided by Google Translate)

The kids were taken away from him for 5 years after Heidi disappeared? So someone must have known she was missing right? I hope someone familiar with Dutch can elaborate on the translation because I'm confused.
i can’t read the full article (paywall) but the translation is correct! i guess it could be read as him listing two different things, maybe?
• the kids were taken away from him at some point (for whatever reason)
• some people around him didn’t trust his story about heidi deciding to leave her children (but maybe didn’t think they have enough proof to go to the police?)

at least i hope it’s not the case that this institution was aware of a suspicious disappearance and didn’t do anything.

i live in the netherlands where child protective services have been having quite some issues due to understaffing, employees getting burnt out and making more mistakes, etc. i’m not sure if the situation in belgium is anything similar, maybe any of the belgian websleuths know!

eta: all speculation/trying to make sense of the situation
 
Belgian here, in my opinion there is a difference between "instelling" and "jeugdvoorziening". But these are often mixed up in colloquial language.

Children are placed in instellingen by a judge/correctional officer because they (usually) have severe personality problems or have committed crimes. There are 3 institutions in Flanders.

Jeugdvoorzieningen are places where children without a stable home situation end up. Sometimes also for children who have committed small crimes, but it's less intensive than an instelling imo. There are many more of these all over Flanders. In any case, this will always be a somewhat traumatic experience for the child.

It seems to me that the children were placed in the latter, but I'm not sure.

Understaffing, infrastructural problems with care institutions, ... is also a problem in Belgium, but there have not been any real scandals that I know of.
 
Moeder van verdwenen Sigrid Dormaels (38): “Mijn dochter en Heidi hadden allebei een drugsprobleem, dat is misschien hun einde geworden”

Mother of missing Sigrid Dormaels (38): ‘My daughter and Heidi both had a drug problem, that may have become their undoing’

Eight kilometres apart they lived: Heidi De Schepper (26) and Sigrid Dormaels (38), two pretty young women from Balen, who mysteriously disappeared in 2010 and 2008 respectively. According to Martine, Sigrid's mum, it is not inconceivable that the same drug dealer is behind both cases.
Joining us, she tells her story. ‘Before I die, I want to know exactly what happened to my daughter,’ she says.

BBM

The rest is subscription only.
 
Well, I was lucky. A Belgian friend of mine has the newspaper and she read it out loud on the phone.

So the mother of Sigrid Dormaels gets the shock of her life when she is watching tv on Sunday night and sees the calls for witnesses in the disappearance of Heidi de Schepper. Her daughter Sigrid has been missing since 2008 from Balen, she left on Valentine's day and took all her pets with her. All her pets! A dog! A ferret! Birds in a cage!
After two weeks, the mother reports her daughter missing but nothing was ever found, only her car.That car was dumped into the canal by Sigrid's boyfriend. He admitted as much, and explained nothing. But according to the police, he could not be the perpetrator, something her mother does not understand at all.

Sigrid was a drug user, she struggled, got into financial problems. Worked as a prostitute to pay for drugs Also fell in love with the drug dealer who sold cocaine in the area. Was he the one who came to pick her up that Valentine's day?

========

And was he the one who also sold drugs to Heidi de Schepper, who according to the news had no income of her own?
 
“It seems that no one has seen Heidi De Schepper (26) yet. The police have already received about 50 tips about the missing young mother from Balen. But striking: according to our information, none of them come from someone who saw Heidi De Schepper after June 2010. That is the moment when, according to her ex-partner, she leaves their three children with him and leaves.”

Politie kreeg al 50 tips over verdwenen Heidi De Schepper (26)
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
148
Guests online
490
Total visitors
638

Forum statistics

Threads
625,566
Messages
18,506,333
Members
240,817
Latest member
chalise
Back
Top