Peliman
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2008
- Messages
- 6,766
- Reaction score
- 53
Just finished watching.
Ahmmm, well let me say this since I've edited this type of news story and it's components before. In the news world this is known as a package. The reporter was held to a 2:33 min timeline from start to finish. It's actually one minute longer than generally allowed for time slots.
It's nothing but sound bytes from AB and a reporter telling his story. Because of this it's very possible everything AB said could be taken out of context. It's already reported the interview lasted 90 minutes. Most of that should be raw footage unless the video-journalist ran out of batteries for the camera.
LE needs to subpoena the raw footage ASAP as it maybe destroyed 3-7 days from now depending on the news stations policy. So far everything else has hit the cutting room floor. I do tend to expect to see more at some point because in my view the package shown was weak. It was all the reporters take on things, it wasn't even a good tease. JMO
Think about it a second if it was you trying to convey your story and some reporter only took 20 seconds of snippets of what you said and the context to which that sound byte was taken.
BTW: I know we would all like to see the raw footage but don't count on it. Lawyers are at work from different angles.
Word for me tonight is subpoena
Ahmmm, well let me say this since I've edited this type of news story and it's components before. In the news world this is known as a package. The reporter was held to a 2:33 min timeline from start to finish. It's actually one minute longer than generally allowed for time slots.
It's nothing but sound bytes from AB and a reporter telling his story. Because of this it's very possible everything AB said could be taken out of context. It's already reported the interview lasted 90 minutes. Most of that should be raw footage unless the video-journalist ran out of batteries for the camera.
LE needs to subpoena the raw footage ASAP as it maybe destroyed 3-7 days from now depending on the news stations policy. So far everything else has hit the cutting room floor. I do tend to expect to see more at some point because in my view the package shown was weak. It was all the reporters take on things, it wasn't even a good tease. JMO
Think about it a second if it was you trying to convey your story and some reporter only took 20 seconds of snippets of what you said and the context to which that sound byte was taken.
BTW: I know we would all like to see the raw footage but don't count on it. Lawyers are at work from different angles.
Word for me tonight is subpoena