- Joined
- May 17, 2013
- Messages
- 658
- Reaction score
- 8,979
Pics of MM in a push-up bra. Regardless of what I might conclude about her based on her involvement with MS, I feel bad for her. It is unfortunate that her pics have to be shown to the world. JMO
That seems a bit violating. For one I hope they made sure she was of age in those photos before displaying them. Second, what is the relevance of a "sexy selfie" being shown in court??
Pics of MM in a push-up bra. Regardless of what I might conclude about her based on her involvement with MS, I feel bad for her. It is unfortunate that her pics have to be shown to the world. JMO
I don't imagine the Crown would include those type of photos gratuitously, so I'm thinking they may connect somehow in the bigger picture that will later become apparent, IMO.
All MOO.
The photo in question that is mentioned today at trial, may be the same one online that MM herself posted for all the world to see, IMO.
All MOO.
That seems a bit violating. For one I hope they made sure she was of age in those photos before displaying them. Second, what is the relevance of a "sexy selfie" being shown in court??
how is this relevant to Tim's murder? was this necessary to show photos of her in court in a pushup bra?
I know my opinion is unpopular. I'm not trying to stick up for anyone in particular. I was a friend of TB's. But I will stand by my opinion. It will be hard for MM to ever move on from this if everyone remembers her as some murderer's slinky girlfriend, the one in the push-up bra.
I was wondering that as well. So far we have seen a lot of items introduced by the Crown that would be considered as "loose ends." For now anyway. For them to show them there must be some relevance. Time line related? Possibly found on another of the devices as well? I can't see them introducing this as evidence if it isn't somehow beneficial. MOO
I don't know. It seems like DM was pretty good at charming people. Regardless, I'm not trying to judge anyone's character, I'm just saying they are entitled like everyone else to have their privacy respected and to not be harassed/exploited unduly by the public. <modsnip>
It shows a lot of things. Mostly establishing that this was Smich's iPad, not some kind of shared property. A lot of the meaningless evidence presented is just to reinforce connections, whether it be to other people, devices, residences, or whatever.
I know my opinion is unpopular. I'm not trying to stick up for anyone in particular. I was a friend of TB's. But I will stand by my opinion. It will be hard for MM to ever move on from this if everyone remembers her as some murderer's slinky girlfriend, the one in the push-up bra.
I know my opinion is unpopular. I'm not trying to stick up for anyone in particular. I was a friend of TB's. But I will stand by my opinion. It will be hard for MM to ever move on from this if everyone remembers her as some murderer's slinky girlfriend, the one in the push-up bra.
I think it's to show how close she was to MS and how much they entrusted in each other. When it comes to her testifying the defense can't try to spin as she was just an acquaintance
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Interesting that he mentioned photos of a woman and man in July 2012. Could it be DM and LB?