I guess I am getting confused. We are not the jury here, and as such, we talk about our prior knowledge that Isho has charges against him (as well as 2 others I believe) for selling DM the gun that killed his father, WM. So if this gun referred to in court today via emails between Isho and DM from back in February 2012 is for the purchase of a gun... and then it was used in November 2012 to murder his father (perhaps also used in June/July 2012 to murder LB, who knows??!!).. the police would have confiscated the gun as the then-proof that WM had committed 'suicide', correct? So how are they indicating now that the fun has relevance in *this* case, which happened in May 2013? There is no chance that police would have gone to check out the suicide of WM and said, 'ya, the victim shot himself causing a bleed to the brain, and there's the gun he used, sitting right there beside him, so let's just leave it with his son as a memento'? And.. there was also mention of 2 guns, that both DM and MS had guns. Are there other additional emails between Isho and either DM or MS about the purchase of another gun or two? How can the gun purch'd back in Feb 2012 which was apparently used in WM's murder, be the same gun that killed TB? What am I missing?