I know many members here have been around since the beginning and had to contend with DM defenders, so I get that it was likely frustrating for those long-time members who had insight into DM from the get go, IMO, but the way I look at it is that some people may have expressed their views honestly because they really didn't think DM was guilty, and not because they knew DM or had any ulterior motive to be here, IMO. OTOH, some posters, and I'm thinking of a specific few, may have been DM supporters with ulterior motives, IMO, but I can't say that is a fact, IMO.
I mention this now because I am sensitive to being labelled an "MS supporter" because I cannot yet state that I find him guilty, as most others here do, IMO. I can assure you all I only want to hear all the testimony pertaining to MS before concluding in my own mind that he is guilty as charged, and not because I have any ulterior motive. I don't know any of the people involved in this case, and my opinions are honest, even if they are not widely shared. Everyone arrives at their own conclusions in their own time, IMO. I hope members here understand my motives for being with WS and don't lump me in with those whose motives for posting here may be questionable just because I may or may not agree with the majority so far about MS.
All MOO.