Bosma Murder Trial 05.04.16 - Day 45

[MsSherlock]

A 4 day break- I don't know about anyone else, but I sure need to de-DM & de-CN myself!!! They should have some type of WS therapy!!

 

[Yendys]

by Adam Carter 11:14 AM

She also wrote "I will not talk, put Dell in jeopardy." She says she didn't want to give the police evidence about Millard using "drugs and things that would harm his character."

Sorry I'm way behind. CN is worried that info about drug use will harm DM'S character. But murdering someone is not harmful to one's character. Oh dear.😕

 

[andreww]

Pretty much what we expected right?

 

[ILoveDateline]

Love, LOVE , dungey's wrap up.

 

[Dutchman]

Dungey summed it up perfectly. "I deserve you, you deserve me." That testimony was painful.

 

[Tealgrove]

Dungey summed it up perfectly. "I deserve you, you deserve me." That testimony was painful.

How perfect is that? He couldn't have put it any better! Love Dungey!

 

[mozzagirl]

BBM
You only need to work on your story to convince they jury of your innocence if you actually did it. Otherwise, you are just trying to tell the truth.

I noticed the exact same words as you in his letter. "I want the jury to BELIEVE I am not a murderer."

 

[JPC]

Dungey summed it up perfectly. "I deserve you, you deserve me." That testimony was painful.

Nice way to tie the two of them together in the eyes of the jury. 2 peas in a pod.

 

[SnooperDuper]

A 4 day break- I don't know about anyone else, but I sure need to de-DM & de-CN myself!!! They should have some type of WS therapy!!

I pretty well thought thanks, I am going to go to Walmart and shake my bag of weevil-infested rice at them, and it's gonna be a de-stressor. So looking forward to dealing with everyday (we)evils. DM, CN, MB, LW2, all just OTT.

 

[MrsThreadgoode]

"I don't know why we didn't call the police then. We waited for legal counsel," she says. She wiped down the trailer before getting counsel.
by Adam Carter 12:11 PM

"You don't care about the missing person, it's got my prints and Dell's on it, right?" Dungey says. Noudga says no. She says she "wasn't tampering with possible evidence, she was just removing her involvement."
by Adam Carter 12:12 PM

I'm sorry, darling, but that's the same thing with a nice little word spin on it

CN keeps stressing that wiping hers and MB's fingerprints off wasn't tampering with evidence, it was just removing their involvement ...

Can someone explain her reasoning here? I mean, legally, isn't wiping ANY prints off (regardless of whether the prints belonged to CN,MB or DM) considered tampering with evidence?

Or does her charge of accessory after the fact basically mean that it was OK for her to remove her own and MB's prints, but by removing DM's she is more guilty?

Sorry if I haven't worded my question well ... I am just trying to understand, legally speaking.

Thank you.

 

[flipflop]

This tweet says a lot....

Adam Carter ‏@AdamCarterCBC · 5h5 hours ago

"In some of the letters he changed his mind, he wasn't always talking about framing Mark," Noudga says. #TimBosma #Bosma

 

[Errrr]

molly hayes ‏@mollyhayes 9m9 minutes ago
Dungey reads another note: "do they know it was him who put the trailer at his mom's? They cannot prove it bc no prints." #Bosma

BAZINGA!

MOO

And, what led them to believe that trailer had any significance whatsoever? So much significance that they had to go into hiding and conspire to tamper with it because media and police would be swarming. I still think Rabbit was afraid her house would get tossed if her prints were found.

 

[SnooperDuper]

CN keeps stressing that wiping hers and MB's fingerprints off wasn't tampering with evidence, it was just removing their involvement ...

Can someone explain her reasoning here? I mean, legally, isn't wiping ANY prints off (regardless of whether the prints belonged to CN,MB or DM) considered tampering with evidence?

Or does her charge of accessory after the fact basically mean that it was OK for her to remove her own and MB's prints, but by removing DM's she is more guilty?

Sorry if I haven't worded my question well ... I am just trying to understand, legally speaking.

Thank you.

She's trying to make a distinction because she wants to explain her behaviour as not helping DM and not criminally motivated. She has a very interesting understanding of the law IMO, where despite advice she keeps on making decisions that cross the line as far as what is legal to do. Then she explains it's because she spent the first three years of her life in another country. smh.

 

[Errrr]

Well I get that MB and CN made a pact over wine to cover for DM...and each other.

DM, MB and CN stand together.

I suspect that term "mess" came from MB when Dell was a kid. When she shifted him onto his dad the messes became missions.

 

[flipflop]

CN keeps stressing that wiping hers and MB's fingerprints off wasn't tampering with evidence, it was just removing their involvement ...

Can someone explain her reasoning here? I mean, legally, isn't wiping ANY prints off (regardless of whether the prints belonged to CN,MB or DM) considered tampering with evidence?

Or does her charge of accessory after the fact basically mean that it was OK for her to remove her own and MB's prints, but by removing DM's she is more guilty?

Sorry if I haven't worded my question well ... I am just trying to understand, legally speaking.

Thank you.

That's all she has, she is trying to convince the jury that she has nothing to do with any of this. If she says it enough, she feels she might convince people!!!! In her eyes, if she convinces people of her beliefs....she will have a life, if people see it as tampering...her life in the medical field that she has worked hard for is OVER!!!!

MOO, I believe she is guilty of her charges when they come about!!!!

 

[Massasauga Rattler]

I'm sure there will be more evidence against her at her own trial, however based on the evidence produced in this trial, in totality or otherwise, I don't see they have any kind of strong case against her. That's my humble take.

 

[Errrr]

I mentioned this when that letter came out. I wondered if DM was trying to pin it on MS and the MWJ gang as those are the ones known for guns. That if so, DM better cover his butt in the pen.

That horse already left the barn

 

[andreww]

CN keeps stressing that wiping hers and MB's fingerprints off wasn't tampering with evidence, it was just removing their involvement ...

Can someone explain her reasoning here? I mean, legally, isn't wiping ANY prints off (regardless of whether the prints belonged to CN,MB or DM) considered tampering with evidence?

Or does her charge of accessory after the fact basically mean that it was OK for her to remove her own and MB's prints, but by removing DM's she is more guilty?

Sorry if I haven't worded my question well ... I am just trying to understand, legally speaking.

Thank you.

Like another poster asked earlier, how did cops know they wiped the locks? Only CN and MB knew about it and to my knowledge, neither has given a statement, soooooooo....

 

[Nosey Parker]

Before I go off and de-stress with gardening for four days - apart from reinforcing DM's guilt (in my mind), and practically proving her own (in my mind) - has this helped MS in his defence?

 

[Inspector_North]

Ok! Everyone look into the Men in Black neuralyzer, while thinking about the 'hose"

MOO