Has Boulder left this case open? If so, is anyone assigned to work the case?
Is it officially a cold case now that it is over ten years old? If so, does Boulder have an appointed or volunteer cold case squad?
If neither of the above apply, what is the official status?
As of the JMK case it was open however it was not being actively worked so as anyone could tell till that whole bogus charade started to blow some smoke. Personally I think that was all so much Baloney timed to make Patsys funeral less a spectacle and by provding the appearnce of working the case around the anniversary of her death, They had Karr groomed and ready didnt they for that horse and pony show. That is my personal opinion based on how stupid do they really think we all are?!?
As of the JMK case it was open however it was not being actively worked so as anyone could tell till that whole bogus charade started to blow some smoke. Personally I think that was all so much Baloney timed to make Patsys funeral less a spectacle and by provding the appearnce of working the case around the anniversary of her death, They had Karr groomed and ready didnt they for that horse and pony show. That is my personal opinion based on how stupid do they really think we all are?!?
Well, I must confess CK, that as an outsider (meaning I'm nowhere near Boulder) what you describe is how it appeared to me. The Karr fiasco also closely coincided with JonBenet's birthday too but I can't remember what day he was arrested.
I suppose if it is not an active case they must believe the Intruder is no longer a threat. They could at least have the decency to set the status as a cold case. I'd bet there are several retired professionals who'd foot the bill to come to Boulder and work on the case gratis.
Doesn't every murder case have to remain open till solved? I mean, it can become a cold case after a time, but the case can't be closed till it is solved. There is no statute of limitations on murder cases. The Boulder DA can't simply close it. So in that respect, Lacy can easily give the impression they are still working on the case by stating that it is still open. It may be open, but no one in the DA's office has worked on that case in 9 years.
Now, if they said it was closed- we'd know they had solved it and declined to prosecute. And in my mind that would indicate 2 things: They can't prosecute because the perp is dead (PR) OR they can't prosecute because the perp was under 10 years old (BR). (Or he was involved somehow)
Doesn't every murder case have to remain open till solved? I mean, it can become a cold case after a time, but the case can't be closed till it is solved. There is no statute of limitations on murder cases. The Boulder DA can't simply close it. So in that respect, Lacy can easily give the impression they are still working on the case by stating that it is still open. It may be open, but no one in the DA's office has worked on that case in 9 years.
Now, if they said it was closed- we'd know they had solved it and declined to prosecute. And in my mind that would indicate 2 things: They can't prosecute because the perp is dead (PR) OR they can't prosecute because the perp was under 10 years old (BR). (Or he was involved somehow)
I know it's an unpopular frame of mind, but I still wonder about Burke and the under-ten rule. But if he had a hand in her death from roughhousing or a brotherly outburst it would still be accidental. So why wouldn't John and Patsy call 911? I don't believe they'd risk letting JonBenet die just to protect Burke. Guess we'll never know but I sometimes think John and Burke were doing something together and JonBenet somehow became involved in something accidental. Regardless, Patsy wrote that note and she agreed with Steve Thomas that whoever wrote the note was the killer.
If BR had anything to do with this, it was not simply roughhousing or an outburst. Whatever the Rs may have been, they would not have let JBR die for something like that. The only way that works is if he was the one who bashed her skull and they thought she was already dead and staged the crime from that point. But they could still have done the note/kidnapping/you-called-cops-so-we-killed-her thing without such an elaborate staging.
I don't know about this one...
BR was an odd kid, IMHO, but this would be hard to seem blase about.
I guess I have a different perspective on the injury because the wound, to me, indicates JonBenet hit something instead of something hitting her.
In my view, it wasn't elaborately staged. Really, all they did was write a ransom note, clean and probably redress her, use the ligature, then wrap her in a blanket and put her in the farthest recess of the house. The rest of the suspected actions, like cleaning the flashlight, were probably done for CYA purposes. The cleaning of JonBenet may also have been CYA.
My main reason for not thinking Burke was involved is he was a nine-year-old boy. They aren't likely to keep a secret that long. They'd tell someone. Maybe he did. Maybe he told a minister or psychiatrist. Who knows????? I just wish Boulder would turn those case papers and evidence over to someone. :furious:
They are not activley doing anything either it sits warehoused and thats about it other than waiting for a hit on CODIS .
and we RDI's all know there's never going to be a match on that,unless they bother to test those factory workers or material makers.
I hope all the IDI's aren't holding their breath for a match,shouldn't they know by now there isn't ever going to BE one?
They (IDI'S) are waiting for the Fat Lady to sing regarding a random Hit on CODIS . Thing is there is no NO FAT LADY , aww we got is some underpaid factory worker who does not even realize he le sneezed on some material that was made into some panties at least over ten years ago Its a bit late to say kazundhigt now isnt it!?!!
I guess I have a different perspective on the injury because the wound, to me, indicates JonBenet hit something instead of something hitting her.
In my view, it wasn't elaborately staged. Really, all they did was write a ransom note, clean and probably redress her, use the ligature, then wrap her in a blanket and put her in the farthest recess of the house. The rest of the suspected actions, like cleaning the flashlight, were probably done for CYA purposes. The cleaning of JonBenet may also have been CYA.
My main reason for not thinking Burke was involved is he was a nine-year-old boy. They aren't likely to keep a secret that long. They'd tell someone. Maybe he did. Maybe he told a minister or psychiatrist. Who knows????? I just wish Boulder would turn those case papers and evidence over to someone. :furious:
Depends on your definition of elaborate? But staged it was, and it is safe to assume she was not assaulted and asphyxiated whilst wrapped in blankets, so the blankets were not a sudden afterthought.In my view, it wasn't elaborately staged.
BOESP,
Depends on your definition of elaborate? But staged it was, and it is safe to assume she was not assaulted and asphyxiated whilst wrapped in blankets, so the blankets were not a sudden afterthought.
I'm not certain how rare it is, but lets say uncommon, for a complete staged crime-scene to be attempted, thats what the wine-cellar is. Many other staged crimes rely on accident, arson, water, faking a burglary, or allegedly in a case currently ongoing in the UK, leaving the body in-situ and faking a death by drug-overdose. JonBenet's corpse was relocated, redressed, cleaned up, with the garrote and restraints added. The foregoing tends towards the elaborate in my estimation?
.
placing things around the body in a ritualistic way;