Breaking News Archive - 20th - 26th Aug

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #941
lol--wudge.Patsy's handwriting has more matches than Karr's--haven't you read any of SuperDave's posts or viewed the many links showing Patsy's writing matching up bigtime with the ransom note?--There is still not one iota of evidence that Karr had anything to with this crime--and if Lacy doesn't have anything besides a freak's confession,then she may as well as resign right now lol
 
  • #942
Peter Hamilton said:
When the judge first said the word murder today at the hearing,Karr flinched badly,closing his eyes lowering his head--Usually,a killer who is guilty doesn't flinch at all when the charges are read--so,he's either a real wimp,or perhaps he's realizing that he's taking this charade too far--we'll soon find out

He didn’t flinch when claiming responsibility. He was only delusional enough to think his actions were accidental. Now he is in reality.

I agree we will find out soon enough.
 
  • #943
Buzzm1 said:
That's by far the best evidence they have so far. I don't know if it would be enough to convict on a DP elgible though?? A DNA match would be a guarantee.


The best evidence is Karr's confession. The handwriting comparison work is the best corroboration that is publically available. Plus, the D.A, had something in their affidavit that has not yet been made known.

As for a capital case, I think in a trial that may well prove to be a real point of contention. There is no doubt in Karr's mind that the proper charge is second-degree murder. And I have not yet seen or heard anything that is clear, unyielding and compelling as regards premeditation.
 
  • #944
JDB said:
There is no one saying he was in Colo when she was murdered. There is no one coming forward saying he was at the open House.
He is a lunatic that needs help.
Heck as much as some of us know about the Peterson case I could say if ISP was not convicted I did it. And that I was with Laci meaning in sprit

The information you cited is bottom feeding on the internet based on emails from who knows where.

The case will pend on hard evidence, not a bunch of nonsense from what so and so said in a chat room five years ago.
 
  • #945
Peter Hamilton said:
lol--wudge.Patsy's handwriting has more matches than Karr's--haven't you read any of SuperDave's posts or viewed the many links showing Patsy's writing matching up bigtime with the ransom note?--There is still not one iota of evidence that Karr had anything to with this crime--and if Lacy doesn't have anything besides a freak's confession,then she may as well as resign right now lol

Baggett's macro level work was very compelling. He would be a very tough cross; his confidence is extreme at this point.

As for your calling Karr a freak, I can guarantee you this much, if a defense attorney were to call Karr a freak during a trial, he would be helping the State.
 
  • #946
Wudge said:
The best evidence is Karr's confession. The handwriting comparison work is the best corroboration that is publically available. Plus, the D.A, had something in their affidavit that has not yet been made known.

As for a capital case, I think in a trial that may well prove to be a real point of contention. There is no doubt in Karr's mind that the proper charge is second-degree murder. And I have not yet seen or heard anything that is clear, unyielding and compelling as regards premeditation.
A whole lot of puzzle pieces are going to have to fall perfectly in sequence for Karr to be the murderer and the only one involved in the whole thing, I feel.
 
  • #947
Wudge said:
I agree, and macro-level handwriting comparison work is compelling. A defense attorney will have a hard time defeating the dramatic similarities that I saw Baggett present today.

Wudge.....for all of us .......who may not know, What exactly is Macro-Level handwriting comparison? And.....is it the very lastest in handwriting comparison?

Thanks in advance,

xxxxooooo
mama
 
  • #948
islanders said:
The information you cited is bottom feeding on the internet based on emails from who knows where.

The case will pend on hard evidence, not a bunch of nonsense from what so and so said in a chat room five years ago.
excuse me. I am not going on internet chat. I am going on Facts that we know right now.Fact Karr stated to being at the party. HMM no leak to media from anyone confirming he was. Fact family are saying he was with them the night in 1996.No proof of him not being. I know no proof he was.
 
  • #949
Love_Mama said:
Wudge.....for all of us .......who may not know, What exactly is Macro-Level handwriting comparison? And.....is it the very lastest in handwriting comparison?

Thanks in advance,

xxxxooooo
mama


Macro-level refers to what the naked eye can see and discern. However, handwriting experts also use microscopes (micro-level) to examine for signature characteristics that the naked eye cannot readily see; e.g., pen touches and pen lifts often leave unique signature tellings that can clearly identify the writer.

People who might hope to disguise their handwriting will focus on macro level aspects, but tells seen by the microscope are likely to remain.
 
  • #950
JDB said:
excuse me. I am not going on internet chat. I am going on Facts that we know right now.Fact Karr stated to being at the party. HMM no leak to media from anyone confirming he was. Fact family are saying he was with them the night in 1996.No proof of him not being. I know no proof he was.
Hi JDB, I have only seen Hutchins say that he said he went to the party. Has that been confirmed by Karr?
 
  • #951
JBean said:
Hi JDB, I have only seen Hutchins say that he said he went to the party. Has that been confirmed by Karr?
JBean somewhere in this Jungle. I read that he told someone he was at the Party. But that is what is strange. No one that WAS there has come forward to confirm either way.
 
  • #952
JDB said:
JBean somewhere in this Jungle. I read that he told someone he was at the Party. But that is what is strange. No one that WAS there has come forward to confirm either way.
Yes Wendy Hutchins said that he said it, I was just wondering if that was confirmed by Karr.
 
  • #953
JDB said:
excuse me. I am not going on internet chat. I am going on Facts that we know right now.Fact Karr stated to being at the party. HMM no leak to media from anyone confirming he was. Fact family are saying he was with them the night in 1996.No proof of him not being. I know no proof he was.

If there is some claim to Karr being at party, this is bottom feeding on the internet from an unreliable source. It’s a lead that should be evaluated, that’s all.

Karr has confessed.

The handwriting analysis has been credited to Karr by leading experts.

But my point was that we don’t have all of the evidence and jumping to conclusions and flat out saying he couldn’t have done it is a speculation based on limited or no facts.

I think speculation is fine and I’m sure we can all agree that we will know a lot more in a few days.
 
  • #954
islanders said:
If there is some claim to Karr being at party, this is bottom feeding on the internet from an unreliable source. It’s a lead that should be evaluated, that’s all.

Karr has confessed.

The handwriting analysis has been credited to Karr by leading experts.

But my point was that we don’t have all of the evidence and jumping to conclusions and flat out saying he couldn’t have done it is a speculation based on limited or no facts.

I think speculation is fine and I’m sure we can all agree that we will know a lot more in a few days.
Is this "internet bottom feeding"?

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42189

'Cause that's where the discussion of Karr allegedly confessing in 2001 and saying he was at a party.
 
  • #955
JBean said:
Hi JDB, I have only seen Hutchins say that he said he went to the party. Has that been confirmed by Karr?


Not that we know of. And I think this has been an open switch, because at least some party attendees do not recall a stranger being there.

The "party" was on December 23rd. So if Karr was truly at the party, he might well have rented a room somewhere in the area.
 
  • #956
Karr is so disturbed that he may have practiced the handwriting. The ransom note's been all over the place. Didn't someone state that his handwriting in his h.s. yearbook was not a good match. Apparently, it was something about the slant.
 
  • #957
Trino said:
Karr is so disturbed that he may have practiced the handwriting. The ransom note's been all over the place. Didn't someone state that his handwriting in his h.s. yearbook was not a good match. Apparently, it was something about the slant.
That's what I'm thinking. All the experts agree that it's going to come down to how he wrote in 1996. I'm thinking his obsession has caused him to write more and more like the ransom note, just like I think his obsession has caused him to change his appearance to look like the psychic's drawing of 1998.
 
  • #958
  • #959
lighthouselover said:
Is this "internet bottom feeding"?

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42189

'Cause that's where the discussion of Karr allegedly confessing in 2001 and saying he was at a party.

I don’t think there is any credible evidence placing Karr in Boulder, except his own confession and some handwriting analyses.

If this turns out to be something fine. But Karr could have been lying about the party or this woman’s credibility may be invalid.

I’m really enjoying this discussion though. Look forward to reading more later, thanks.
 
  • #960
Although I guess someone claiming he was in Boulder at or around the murder could be used as evidence linking him to the crime scene.

Thanks for the heads up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
114
Guests online
1,587
Total visitors
1,701

Forum statistics

Threads
632,480
Messages
18,627,423
Members
243,166
Latest member
DFWKaye
Back
Top