Safeguard
On Time Out
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2015
- Messages
- 2,289
- Reaction score
- 5,711
I agree. Those statements are very open to interpretation imo also. (Although I do appreciate Hoosen-Fenger's well stated opinion, and the fact that not once was the word, "Faxumentary " used!). I can see why Hoosen feels that way. I think many people, (especially LE are taught to look at such discrepancies as indicators of deception, rather than poorly firing brain cells lol.) Steve Moore said something to that effect in the comment section, on his blog, something about Avery being too quick to suggest LE might be framing him again, (but he conceded that given the history might not be so suspicious, though he found it highly so.)
However:
From the g'man blog, ( I guess we are all calling it that now, I obviously missed some drama thankfully, but I'm all for less typing lol!):
"The story given by Brendan Dassey is completely impossible, given the physical evidence found, not found, and required for it to be true. Absent other evidence to the contrary, I see no indication that Dassey was involved in any way in the disappearance or murder of Teresa Halbach.
"Wiegert embarrassed himself on the stand. He made the (somewhat ignorant) point that Brendan Dassey and Steven Avery had five days to “clean up” the crime scene after the murder."
"What evidence did the prosecution present that the two spent five days cleaning a crime scene, much less an hour? So why is that allowed as evidence in trial?"
"The blood evidence couldn’t be cleaned without a trace. Period. Sorry."
"Brendan Dassey and Steven Avery are portrayed as sick opportunists unable to successfully kill the victim even after several attempts utilizing different means. However, the moment the murder has been consummated, the two, (one with an IQ of 69) instantly became criminal geniuses, adept in concealing the most minute, cellular-level DNA evidence of the murder throughout the house, the carpeting, the bedding and the concrete in the garage. (Oh, and then they leave a bullet out in the open.)"
"Kratz should have been forced to make up his mind and declare who he was prosecuting; bumbling opportunists or criminal masterminds. They can’t be both."
Moore is also planning to follow up by reading trial transcripts and interviewing witnesses :tyou:
opcorn: Very excited about being able (in a week or so) to begin delving into information on the case I have not yet been privy to. Almost always in cases of wrongful conviction, the presented evidence is enough to convict. However, in wrongful convictions, we find that the evidence is unreliable at best, and planted at worst. The big task before me after finishing Episode 10 is to determine which evidence is valid and reasonable. I will not, even among ‘friends’ working together toward learning the truth, accept a piece of evidence as valid without knowing the pedigree of that evidence.
After the conclusion of my next and last analysis of Making a Murderer. I will be initiating a new phase in the investigation; Interviewing witnesses ! And you all will be witnesses! You have trial transcripts, you have read the statements of certain people, you have intimate knowledge on the cases, and some of you have areas in which you have specialized. When speaking with ‘witnesses,’ I was always searching for information, but I was also looking for a direction to take the investigation. So from all of you (if you have time) I will be asking you (not now, after Episode 10) to provide me with, or point me toward information you believe is relevant and important.
That will give me a head-start on the deep-dive I’m about to begin after Episode 10. Frankly, I’m excited about where that will take us. And I look forward to working with you all as we move forward."
http://gmancasefile.com/moore-to-the-story/making-a-murderer-an-fbi-agents-take-episode-9
