Brittney Files for Divorce!!!!!!

[2sisters]

That's just too funny!!! She's really going to get everything she deserves from this relationship. She basically went after a guy with one kid and another one on the way who was still in a relationship. Then she's stupid enough to get pregnant not once, but twice by him while actually paying him to treat her like crap and sit around her house. Now she's brought two more kids into the world without a stable home and an idiot for a father. STILL, after all of that, she could have come out of this looking half way decent, but she decides that she "deserves" to go out and party and make herself look like a while two kids stay at home with no parent.

Her mother of the year award in currently being engraved.

 

[Rachael]

exactly, if this were a story about a young, single mom who went out and partied every night, and flashed her genitals to photographers, got slap drunk every night we would be screaming for someone to take her kids.

I agree. Britney has done enough stupid crap with her kids (from driving with the baby on her lap..ec). You don't see the newly single Reese Witherspoon out partying every night and showing her genitals. :doh: That is the difference between having and not having class. Reese was young when she got married and had her kids, so the age thing doesn't make a difference (before someone makes the age comparison). :dance:

 

[ISPTRAX]

I just mustered up the nerve to go see the pics. It's very obvious she's wearing peach/flesh colored panties. Don't know why everyone's got their panties in a bunch... pun intended.

 

[tezi]

That's just too funny!!! She's really going to get everything she deserves from this relationship. She basically went after a guy with one kid and another one on the way who was still in a relationship. Then she's stupid enough to get pregnant not once, but twice by him while actually paying him to treat her like crap and sit around her house. Now she's brought two more kids into the world without a stable home and an idiot for a father. STILL, after all of that, she could have come out of this looking half way decent, but she decides that she "deserves" to go out and party and make herself look like a while two kids stay at home with no parent.

Well, she's not helping herself any. Her handlers better get control of her before she loses the farm paying K-Fed not to take those kids.

She is going to get what is coming, the Karma train is coming. I can hear it.:loser:

 

[Jeana (DP)]

Well, she's not helping herself any. Her handlers better get control of her before she loses the farm paying K-Fed not to take those kids.

She is going to get what is coming, the Karma train is coming. I can hear it.:loser:

Absolutely!!!

 

[southcitymom]

.....Good grief who wants to look at that.....

Well to start with, just about every heterosexual teenage boy on Planet Earth....

 

[tezi]

Well to start with, just about every heterosexual teenage boy on Planet Earth....

Yeah, I have one of those. My statement was an idiotic statement to make.

 

[Masterj]

It is indecent exposure. Good grief who wants to look at that crap?

LOL - apparently several posters here did judging by their comments. I'll take everyone's word they exist. I don't need to damage my own retinas by looking.

 

[tezi]

LOL - apparently several posters here did judging by their comments. I'll take everyone's word they exist. I don't need to damage my own retinas by looking.

Masterj, I didn't damage my retinas either or my computer! I can't afford the repair bill for the computer or the doctor bill for my eyes!!! LOL

 

[Melisinde]

I'm officially resigning as a Britney Spears fan. I've always had a soft spot for her and since she's my age, I always thought she would be cool to hang out with. A lot of the time, she comes off as a very sweet individual (she was freaking out and hugging all the paparazzi when they helped her put gas in her car the other night.) *sigh* This is all just too much though. She could have totally been the next Julia Roberts/Reese Witherspoon in terms of being America's next Sweetheart. The public LOVED her when she announced her divorce and showed up looking fabulous on Lettermen. I was ready to believe in the comeback then. Now though. *smh* I would never DREAM of going out without underwear on but especially if I had on a short skirt/knew people would be taking my picture. Crap- it's bad when PARIS HILTON is pulling your legs together ("closing the barn doors.") Britney- you make me sad.

 

[ljwf22]

I just mustered up the nerve to go see the pics. It's very obvious she's wearing peach/flesh colored panties. Don't know why everyone's got their panties in a bunch... pun intended.

Surely you jest. No panties in sight. You can even see her C-section scar!

 

[tezi]

Surely you jest. No panties in sight. You can even see her C-section scar!

I'm going to take your word for it, I don't think my computer could withstand something like that. And I know my eyes couldn't.

 

[ember]

I just mustered up the nerve to go see the pics. It's very obvious she's wearing peach/flesh colored panties. Don't know why everyone's got their panties in a bunch... pun intended.

ya know...I wonder if they are doctored...?....they do take a pic of a person and change the heads on some magazine covers....heard they put Julia Roberts head on a different body for one magazine...and have heard of other cases....I just wonder....because I've been to different site where the pics are...and in some she had panties but on others, she doesn't:waitasec: ...and it's only on the
close ups sick: ) that it shows completely nude clearly...her panties could be low enough to reveal her scar making it seem realistic....I just guess I know from working with photoshop extensively that this can be done....just wondering...KFed would be skanky enough to perpetuate something like this....and I find it strange that no one in her camp has made a statement one way or another about it...I mean geesh! It's even been on FOX....dunno....

 

[ISPTRAX]

Surely you jest. No panties in sight. You can even see her C-section scar!

Hmmm... I just went to the perezhilton.com site. There must be others more revealing because she was definitely wearing underwear in those shots... and they really didn't show that much.

 

[nanandjim]

Hmmm... I just went to the perezhilton.com site. There must be others more revealing because she was definitely wearing underwear in those shots... and they really didn't show that much.

The photos that I saw (can't remember which site) were worse than . They were disgusting.

 

[Floh]

Hmmm... I just went to the perezhilton.com site. There must be others more revealing because she was definitely wearing underwear in those shots... and they really didn't show that much.

From what i can tell, she's done this exhibition three times this week. the photographs you are referring to, i can well believe they were flesh coloured knickers, but most certainly one set of photographs were most definitely sans knickers. :sick:

***

O/T: what i'm about to say now will sound strange to at least 90% of participants, but . . . i'll tell you anyway.

me and my British friend, Jane (i'm also a Brit - albeit transplanted), think the word *panties* is perverse. to us. it sounds . . . kinky. we call 'em knickers. or pants, when being formal.

now i know you all call trousers pants.

but there you have it.

initially when reports of Britney came through she had taken her pants off in a club, i had thought it meant her knickers. but of course it was trousers - THEN!

ah, but lo and behold she went futher, silly slag, and went and dispensed with her knickers anyway.

such is life. :slap:

 

[2sisters]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,233059,00.html

 

[tezi]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,233059,00.html

That was a great article. Seriously, is she on drugs? I mean, she can't be thinking at this point. She better get the checkbook out now, cause she made K-Fed a very rich man.

 

[southcitymom]

The photos that I saw (can't remember which site) were worse than . They were disgusting.

It's happened 3 or 4 times this week. I've seen all the pictures. They are not worse than and they are only disgusting if you find a woman's vagina disgusting. Britney's lady parts look like most female lady parts. Hers happen to be shaved.

Mind you - I wouldn't want my lady parts flapping in the breeze like that - but there is nothing inherently skanky about her nether regions.

 

[Mabel]

I just mustered up the nerve to go see the pics. It's very obvious she's wearing peach/flesh colored panties. Don't know why everyone's got their panties in a bunch... pun intended.

There are pics of her wearing a green dress in which it looks like she's wearing peach panties. In the other pics she is most definitely bare bottomed, there is no mistaking it. I can't seem to find the right links now. Maybe someone else can help.