Brooke Bennett, 12 years old Randolph VT #17

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #241
  • #242
I believe that from the day Jacques started to hatch this plan of kidnapping Brooke it was only one way in his mind that it ended..in her sadistic death. We have 2 references previous to him telling the 18 year old that he was going to murder her like he did the 12 year old in or from Arizona, by slitting her throat. (Although there is no proof he ever did that..he said he did)

Then we have the references he made to AR about Breckenridge that the first girl gets to live, the second gets their throat cut and their mom will also die.

Then in another statement AR says that most girls leave Breckenridge by the time they are 12 years old, but she isn't really clear herself why..she guesses they won't do things.

Brooke was 12 years old at the time of her death..about to turn 13. If he was going to fulfill this fantasy of the 12 year old dying at his hands violently..as well as raped and tortured he had to do it now.

This was premediated , I'd say over years, he knew exactly what was going to happen to Brooke that day. I also wonder how many other 12 year old or younger vics there are of his.

I think that he set up AR to be angry at Brooke, therefore gaining AR's further confidence in getting her to "the party". I don't think that anything had happened to Brooke yet. However I think MJ told AR that something had happened with Brooke and that she was about to tell on all of them. I just see this as the way MJ has always manipulated AR, telling her things that others are thinking and saying that probably weren't true.

I think he has had a fantasy about raping, torturing and slitting the throat of a 12 year old girl for many years..atleast since 1993. I think if someone pulled his coounseling session files they would find that fantasy there. Brooke would have turned 13 this coming up weekend..that's why he needed to act fast. He needed a 12 year old that was within the family..that is the only way this fantasy would work for him.


Great post, absolutely and totally agree with you!
 
  • #243
Vermont Corrections officials have changed their story and admitted they actually SUPPORTED early probation release for the man accused of kidnapping Brooke Bennett
Federal authorities have charged Michael Jacques with kidnapping his niece Brooke Bennett, 12.
In 2006, Jacques was released seven years early from probation for raping and kidnapping a teenager in Rutland in 1992.
In 2004, Judge Amy Davenport okayed the early release over the strong opposition of prosecutors.
Last week, Corrections officials insisted they also opposed the early release.
However, today the Governor's office said that Corrections made a mistake. A double check of records shows the department actually urged the judge to okay the early release for Jacques.

http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=8650670&nav=menu183_2

Oh Oh someone is changing their stories :eek:

Oh Oh is right! IMO, the last PO that MJ had was such a turn around that I wonder if he even followed up on MJ at all.

Still catching up, BRB.
 
  • #244
Was Judge Davenport high on bat**** when she wrote this in her ruling?

See? Judge Davanport was well aware of what Jacques had done. I have NEVER known of anyone getting let out of their probation SEVEN years early. Ever.
I am of the opinion that this judge should either be fired or forced off the bench - like now.
 
  • #245
I believe that they were part of a ring. It's not coincidence that we know of two other known pedos whose names are coming up with this case. Gagnon was collecting five years worth and has known KG for four according to KG. I'd bet my paycheck that the relative JG knows RG, as well.

We sure do think alike, Jaded!
 
  • #246
Brooke was 12 years old at the time of her death..about to turn 13. If he was going to fulfill this fantasy of the 12 year old dying at his hands violently..as well as raped and tortured he had to do it now.

This was premediated , I'd say over years, he knew exactly what was going to happen to Brooke that day. I also wonder how many other 12 year old or younger vics there are of his.
And co-incidentally (?), according to an interview James Bennett gave, Cassandra left Ray Gagnon four years ago, when Brooke would have been eight years old... just about the age AR was when Jacques started abusing her.
 
  • #247
In the affidavit with the emails she stated that she had an encounter (putting it very lightly) with the man having the chevy email address, but she couldn't identify him because she was drugged. MJ admitted the chevy email address belonged to him, so that part confuses me a little. I don't think it was RG because she would be able to identify him... Maybe? IDK. All IMO. :waitasec:

Well, lightinthedark, she could have been given a date rape drug. I think not, tho.
OK, as another poster had pointed out - if this step daughter was participating in sex with MJ and Gagnon, WHO was the 3rd person taking the picture? That is a big problem with the story.

This comment is concerning the white hankercheif (sp?) deal. IF the sperm from the boyfriend was wiped of of ________ (fill in the blank) stomach, her DNA is going to be on it also - not just the boyfriend's.

I am also thinking that Jacques had purchased from the sex equipment site more than once and probably had a whole collection of 'things'. That would have already been found out by LE now.

We are only being allowed to know only certain things at this point, and rightfully so since the investigation is ongoing. I think we will all be shocked when the trials start and we find out the true chain of events!
 
  • #248
See? Judge Davanport was well aware of what Jacques had done. I have NEVER known of anyone getting let out of their probation SEVEN years early. Ever.
I am of the opinion that this judge should either be fired or forced off the bench - like now.

I just thought the way she worded his crimes and they rivaled the violence of those on tv and in the movies. I thought to myself WTH? If she knew they were so brutal then wasn't it contradictory for her to release him? I agree -she needs to be held accountable for her leniency, as does the weenie that gave him an A+ in his "don't be a pedo" class.

And co-incidentally (?), according to an interview James Bennett gave, Cassandra left Ray Gagnon four years ago, when Brooke would have been eight years old... just about the age AR was when Jacques started abusing her.

We already know that not only does RG collect child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬, but he also participates in it. She was within his age of interest. It's very possible that he tried something either on Brooke or her sister.
 
  • #249
I am going over to read the funeral thread now. I cannot understand having the funeral outside. I am glad that Brooke can now rest in peace.
 
  • #250
I've read every single post here since Brooke went missing. What I am going to write here has been building up over the past 2 weeks. I am getting more and more concerned, and the feeling within me is so overwhelming that I have to put it into words: "I wonder how many pedophiles and perverts this case has brought to WS". I am sick just thinking about it. We don't know who lurks, we don't know who is reading, we don't know........ Oh my God, what has humanity come to :(:(:(:(

I'm sick to my heart, my mind, and my soul...reading about this case.

Mohabi, I hear and understand your concern. Yes, it is entirely possible
( human nature being what it is), that some will come here for the wrong reasons. This would be true even in, let's say, a town meeting....but I think that everyone here so far has been careful to word information in as clinical a way as possible....I think we have tried to treat the case with dignity....
and I think that everyone here has tried to keep the focus on a little girl whose life was stolen from her.
In a society where information is open though, there are always going to be those who misuse it.
May Brooke rest in peace.
 
  • #251
Mohabi, I hear and understand your concern. Yes, it is entirely possible
( human nature being what it is), that some will come here for the wrong reasons. This would be true even in, let's say, a town meeting....but I think that everyone here so far has been careful to word information in as clinical a way as possible....I think we have tried to treat the case with dignity....
and I think that everyone here has tried to keep the focus on a little girl whose life was stolen from her.
In a society where information is open though, there are always going to be those who misuse it.
May Brooke rest in peace.

I agree, everyone has been very respectful, and if they are lurking about let them read and know that the good people of the world find them repugnant and vile, and there is no place in society for them except behind bars.
 
  • #252
Well, lightinthedark, she could have been given a date rape drug. I think not, tho.
OK, as another poster had pointed out - if this step daughter was participating in sex with MJ and Gagnon, WHO was the 3rd person taking the picture? That is a big problem with the story.

This comment is concerning the white hankercheif (sp?) deal. IF the sperm from the boyfriend was wiped of of ________ (fill in the blank) stomach, her DNA is going to be on it also - not just the boyfriend's.

I am also thinking that Jacques had purchased from the sex equipment site more than once and probably had a whole collection of 'things'. That would have already been found out by LE now.

We are only being allowed to know only certain things at this point, and rightfully so since the investigation is ongoing. I think we will all be shocked when the trials start and we find out the true chain of events!

Good point LaLaw2000 about the DNA. I thought the picture(s) were of AR and her boyfriend that RG had in the safe (which he received from MJ)? I don't recall in the affidavits that MJ, RG, and AR were in any pictures together... Unless I missed one? I believe you're right about us all being shocked when the whole story comes out. There's so much we don't know. All IMO.
 
  • #253
Again, that is just one example, there are many more....

Love and Respect,
dark_shadows

Yeah, it happens, but we'll have to agree to disagree. IMO, criminals are not that patient. Otherwise, they'd work a normal job and save money to buy a house like the rest of us. They don't, they are too impatient, they want the easy way out. That's always their downfall.
 
  • #254
did nancy, greta, etc. do segments on the case tonight?

such little information coming out the last few days, i imagine this this will continue tho as others have mentioned.
 
  • #255
I am admittedly running behind on being able to keep up with the astounding speed that you guys are posting on this case. Good job, by the way! :clap: I have another question, that may annoy the Heck out of some of you because you may have already discussed it. Sorry in advance if that is the case. :crazy: The two computers that the emails were posted from - one from MJ's home, and one from work. WHAT evidence is there that MJ posted from BOTH of them??? Isn't there room to speculate that a third person (most likely at work) posted from the work computer??? Am I missing a big piece of the puzzle or what?? :waitasec:
 
  • #256
Originally Posted by DeltaDawn
I believe that from the day Jacques started to hatch this plan of kidnapping Brooke it was only one way in his mind that it ended..in her sadistic death. We have 2 references previous to him telling the 18 year old that he was going to murder her like he did the 12 year old in or from Arizona, by slitting her throat. (Although there is no proof he ever did that..he said he did)

Then we have the references he made to AR about Breckenridge that the first girl gets to live, the second gets their throat cut and their mom will also die.

Then in another statement AR says that most girls leave Breckenridge by the time they are 12 years old, but she isn't really clear herself why..she guesses they won't do things.

Brooke was 12 years old at the time of her death..about to turn 13. If he was going to fulfill this fantasy of the 12 year old dying at his hands violently..as well as raped and tortured he had to do it now.

This was premediated , I'd say over years, he knew exactly what was going to happen to Brooke that day. I also wonder how many other 12 year old or younger vics there are of his.

I think that he set up AR to be angry at Brooke, therefore gaining AR's further confidence in getting her to "the party". I don't think that anything had happened to Brooke yet. However I think MJ told AR that something had happened with Brooke and that she was about to tell on all of them. I just see this as the way MJ has always manipulated AR, telling her things that others are thinking and saying that probably weren't true.

I think he has had a fantasy about raping, torturing and slitting the throat of a 12 year old girl for many years..atleast since 1993. I think if someone pulled his coounseling session files they would find that fantasy there. Brooke would have turned 13 this coming up weekend..that's why he needed to act fast. He needed a 12 year old that was within the family..that is the only way this fantasy would work for him.

That is interesting. Remember in one of MJ's emails to AR he mentioned something about this needed to be done before______, what date did he give?
 
  • #257
Yeah, it happens, but we'll have to agree to disagree. IMO, criminals are not that patient. Otherwise, they'd work a normal job and save money to buy a house like the rest of us. They don't, they are too impatient, they want the easy way out. That's always their downfall.

I am going to :shutup: before I get in trouble!!!
 
  • #258
That is interesting. Remember in one of MJ's emails to AR he mentioned something about this needed to be done before______, what date did he give?
I'll have to read my copy, but wasn't it June 16th???
 
  • #259
Wasn't it July 16th?
ETA: Oops, no you are right. June 16th. First June 7th, then the 16th "for the obvious reasons that you already know about."
 
  • #260
Something has been bothering me since reading the posts about Denise looking more fixed up than she did previously. Knowing her history of having marriage after marriage, is she now already looking for the next 1? The impression I get of her is a woman who will not be able to function without a man in her live, regardless of what kind of man he might be.
I hope for her childrens sake she does not move some other rso in!

VB
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
114
Guests online
2,848
Total visitors
2,962

Forum statistics

Threads
632,576
Messages
18,628,653
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top