Brooke Bennett, 12 years old Randolph VT #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
(c) A June 20, 2008, an email from a person using the email address "ChevyPickup" <*******@*********> to JUVENILE 1 states:

Friday, June 20, 2008, 2:02 pm
From: "ChevyPickup <*******@*********>
To: [JUVENILE 1 email address"]

2nd paragraph of this email on page 11 and 12 of affadavit

"I suppose you already heard, but C wants to postpone Monday now until Wednesday or Thursday. I kind of agree because that way you won't have to worry about your aunt showing up or anything plus that c*** Savanna works those days too."


Ah, ok..it was MJ who called Savanna the "c" word.
 
  • #222
  • #223
Ah, ok..it was MJ who called Savanna the "c" word.

I wonder why he would call her that? Maybe bc he "tried" something and she turned him down. Or maybe it has to do with AR not speaking to Savanna? I still would like to know why that was the case. I am wondering if Brooke knew about everything through AR and then Brooke told Savanna some stuff and Savanna told AR she was sick. JMO But you know I think that Savanna is the type that would have said SOMETHING to SOMEONE if she knew. JMO
 
  • #224
I just wanted it to be clear, since Juvenile 1 has already being accused of more than enough; without any extra defamatory claims being attributed to her.

I am questioning in my mind just how will this juvenile's life ever go on? With people all over the country knowing, to some extent, some of the rather lurid details of things she's said; thought; and done (or said she'd done); and fantasized about doing. How can this teenager bare to even show her face around her own family? School? Town? Anywhere?

Truly, I cannot perceive how it's possible.
 
  • #225
I just wanted it to be clear, since Juvenile 1 has already being accused of more than enough; without any extra defamatory claims being attributed to her.

I am questioning in my mind just how will this juvenile's life ever go on? With people all over the country knowing, to some extent, some of the rather lurid details of things she's said; thought; and done (or said she'd done); and fantasized about doing. How can this teenager bare to even show her face around her own family? School? Town? Anywhere?

Truly, I cannot perceive how it's possible.

Yes especially in her town. Everyone HAS to know who AR is,.. considering most of us here do. And IF she really did go to the funeral, all the eyes and accusations on her.

Let me just say though,.. I BELIEVE she is victim in all of this. EVEN if she helped with "the take down". She has been manipulated from the time she was 9 (maybe even earlier). Who knows what she was told and what she has ACTUAL been through. I feel really bad for her bc she has lost her innocence and everything she believed in her life has been a farce. JMO
 
  • #226
Yes especially in her town. Everyone HAS to know who AR is,.. considering most of us here do. And IF she really did go to the funeral, all the eyes and accusations on her.

Let me just say though,.. I BELIEVE she is victim in all of this. EVEN if she helped with "the take down". She has been manipulated from the time she was 9 (maybe even earlier). Who knows what she was told and what she has ACTUAL been through. I feel really bad for her bc she has lost her innocence and everything she believed in her life has been a farce. JMO


Absolutely!
 
  • #227
This was posted this morning in Up to the Minute Section The Establishment Paedophile: How a Monster hid in High Society it is everywhere...there are so many of these sick #@%$s out there! Look how much time he rec'd :eek: Long disturbing article at link.

Roger Took was sentenced this February to a minimum of four and a half years in prison as part of an indeterminate sentence for 17 other crimes relating to child abuse.

ETA..I removed most of my post...after reading it, it's just too much to have on the public board IMO. If you want to read it you can click the link. It is truly disturbing. The only reason I am posting is to show it is EVERYWHERE. These monsters are from all walks of life.

as disgusting as that was to read, thank you for posting it. some people STILL believe that these things do not happen. when will people wake up! and the prison sentence?! enraging! :furious:
 
  • #228
I wonder why he would call her that?
I'm thinking MJ skeeved her out as much as he skeeves us out, and she may have made no bones about it. If that's the case, I'm glad somebody in that immediate circle had a functioning creepometer.
 
  • #229
"Before Vermont lawmakers act on predators read this"


This is a blog posted at the Burlington Free Press website that has exerpts from the affidavitt of the 1992 rape of a woman in Rutland by MJ.

Sickening!!!!!!!! The State of Vermont should be ashamed of releasing this 🤬🤬🤬 from probation early and all people involved in that release should be fired, disbarred and/or removed from their positions!!


http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/...cript=personaScript&plckElementId=personaDest
 
  • #230
I wonder why he would call her that? Maybe bc he "tried" something and she turned him down. Or maybe it has to do with AR not speaking to Savanna? I still would like to know why that was the case. I am wondering if Brooke knew about everything through AR and then Brooke told Savanna some stuff and Savanna told AR she was sick. JMO But you know I think that Savanna is the type that would have said SOMETHING to SOMEONE if she knew. JMO

When reading through the 18-page affidavit, there are several anomalies which caught my eye. One of those was the expression "going to party" verses "at the party". Perhaps it is a typographical error on the part of someone [note: I will have to locate the reference to say just who] at one point however it could be exactly what it was intended to be i.e. going to party. Further on in reading, we learn from an exchange between E and AR, that AR's "plan" calls for Brooke to be inticed by the prospects of having sex with Sam who theoretical has the "hots" for Brooke.

All this seems to contradict the belief that Brooke was naive, or was an innocent player in the upcoming events leading into June 25. Perhaps she was partly mentally prepared but also wary.
 
  • #231
I just wanted it to be clear, since Juvenile 1 has already being accused of more than enough; without any extra defamatory claims being attributed to her.

I am questioning in my mind just how will this juvenile's life ever go on? With people all over the country knowing, to some extent, some of the rather lurid details of things she's said; thought; and done (or said she'd done); and fantasized about doing. How can this teenager bare to even show her face around her own family? School? Town? Anywhere?

Truly, I cannot perceive how it's possible.

I certainly do not want her anywhere near any of my young children. I do not believe that she could ever be reprogramed. And even if she were, her background would still be repugnant. I am old-fashioned and unforgiving.
 
  • #232
Sometimes LE needs a push in the right direction. I do believe they read here as does the media. And, sometimes toes get stepped on. We are not the showboats, we are the behind the scenes investigators that put it all together from different sources to make sure each and every criminal gets his/her due.

I didn't agree with the overly public display of the children especially since as far as I'm concerned their are still more players involved. Just my opinion.
SS wonderful post!
 
  • #233
I noticed that discrepancy, too. 'Going to party' can involve as few as two or three people, whereas 'going to a party' usually means at least several people will be there.

Starr58, thank you for posting the link to that blog. I am astonished that anyone who read the case file would consider for a single moment releasing that piece of filth after only four years, let alone agreeing to terminate his probation seven years early.

I don't care what kind of "rehabilitation" Jacques underwent, as the blog points out he was raping a child throughout the entire process.

I can only imagine how horrifying it must be for the 1992 victim to have all of these details dredged up after all these years. I hope she has been able to come to at least some level of healing.
 
  • #234
Thanks, Carrington. :)
 
  • #235
I wonder why he would call her that? Maybe bc he "tried" something and she turned him down. Or maybe it has to do with AR not speaking to Savanna? I still would like to know why that was the case. I am wondering if Brooke knew about everything through AR and then Brooke told Savanna some stuff and Savanna told AR she was sick. JMO But you know I think that Savanna is the type that would have said SOMETHING to SOMEONE if she knew. JMO

Are you referring to that pic on MySpace of S. with another girl in green shirts, like at a bowling alley or something? I think a lot of people reading a lot into that because they think it is AR. But it is not AR. I'm only saying this so people may stop reading a lot into it.
 
  • #236
I certainly do not want her anywhere near any of my young children. I do not believe that she could ever be reprogramed. And even if she were, her background would still be repugnant. I am old-fashioned and unforgiving.

I can surely understand that, and can't say that I'd want her anywhere near my grandchild. I am concerned about the sibling that resides with her and hope their 'mother' has her eyes wide open now. It does appear that MJ was quite effective in grooming AR, to become like him. Either that or she's a darn good actress.

I'm kind of old-fashioned, too, but I'm not completely unforgiving.
 
  • #237
I'm just sickened by this whole story. Why isn't castration considered for these offenders? Obviously the recidivism rate is almost 100% for these pedophiles, and it seems to me this would reduce that to almost nil, while avoiding the whole "death penalty" discussion. Don't these crimes deserve a castration? Could anything be more heinous than incest with little children? AHHHH!!!

I guess our PC society and "civil rights" stances seem to take precedence over the safety of our children.

Welcome to WS grapejuice!!!!
 
  • #238
I noticed that discrepancy, too. 'Going to party' can involve as few as two or three people, whereas 'going to a party' usually means at least several people will be there.

<SNIP>

.

DianeB,

"going to party" means a lot more than what you have defined. "going to party" is using the street vernacular for "having sex".
 
  • #239
Sometimes LE needs a push in the right direction. I do believe they read here as does the media.

I know for a FACT LE and media read here....and don't forget, there are criminals, prosecutors and attorney's also that read here ;)
 
  • #240
Ditto! :Welcome-12-june: grapejuice! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
124
Guests online
3,312
Total visitors
3,436

Forum statistics

Threads
632,669
Messages
18,630,103
Members
243,244
Latest member
Evan meow meow
Back
Top