Brooke Bennett, 12 yrs. old Randolph, VT #9

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #401
Speaking out is great, but without creating a safe SOLUTION it just MOVES the problem to someone else's neighborhood....often these creeps end up living a transient or economically disadvantaged area in fleabag hotels that rent by the week/month where NO-ONE knows about their Child SO status and it becomes impossible to properly inform the transient population or to restrict the Child SO from contact with children (who are already endangered by their neglectful or transient family situation). There also is a risk that there will be more parents who are illegal immigrants (non English speaking), prostitues, parolees or who are mentally unstable (or addicts) - and NONE of these people are likely to communicate with LE or report a Child SO had contact with their children. If you are already frightened or fear losing custody of your kids you aren't going to go looking for contact with the authorities. And if a child goes missing - it's also possible that it will not get reported to LE, or if it does, that the case will be given little attention.

Since we cannot (a this time) use the DP or convict the (non murdering) Child SO to LWOP I suggest we not to keep moving these vile creatures around on the fringes of society but permanently remove them from OUR society by requiring lifetime supervised parole in a self supporting (they work inside the property ONLY) closed (restricted) facility/property - a separate society with other adults who choose to reside with them and have NO CHILDREN. No access to uncontrolled internet, 🤬🤬🤬🤬 or other forbidden items and no contact with children, EVER. Given a choice of say life in prison and being paroled to such a facility/property after serving their sentence I think most would volunteer to go - and they would then be paying for their own lifetime monitoring - and one strike, one broken rule - and since they are on parole - they are OUT, forever - back to prison, that day - with no parole.

What we are doing with monitoring and information and cummunity/public action isn't working - agencies, LE and Parole Officers are overworked and underpaid and are NOT given the monetary and technological resources to supervise Child SO's and protect society. And moving Child SO's "away" (the "not on my street" solution) doesn't do anything but keep them constantly transient, make them harder to monitor and control and force them into situations where the most vulnerable, throw away victims are present in large numbers. What we are doing is not working and it's not protecting ALL of the children. Until there is a CURE (for real, 100%) for pedophelia we MUST demand that convicted Child SO's be removed from our society for LIFE - and in such a way that the financial burden falls on the Child SO him/herself - not US. These people are perfectly cabable of earning a living, they just need to do it in a fully controlled and monitored (24-7-365) environment where no children are endangered. I am tired of supporting these creeps while they sit and fantasize in prison and I want them out of society - ALL society for LIFE.

Just My Opinion

I have always said we need to put them on an island surrounded by shark infested waters. Let them be self sufficient . But no children , no visitors, no dropped in cell phones or computers. If they want to have an orderly society then by all means police their selves. Otherwise may they enjoy their final days there, worried about the guy across the street that keeps following him.
my 2cents
 
  • #402
If he didn't intend to kill her or hold her hostage then why the elaborate set up? Why the fake emails to make it seem she had run away to Texas? Why did they leave the house, go to the convenience store where Jacques makes it a point to talk to the clerk and appear as the concerned adult...if not to get third party corroboration of his alibi? He got the semen in advance of her disappearance as well.

Just for clarification.................in the quote used, I only wrote the first part of the first sentence - "I'm not up to speed on everyones thoughts." :)
 
  • #403
She IS a victim, but we don't give passes to teenagers and adults who have had horrible childhoods, been abused when they go on to commit crimes themselves. 14 and 15 year olds are tried as adults all of the time in this country.

I think she did a lot more than just get Brooke to the house, watch TV and then leave. But, I could be wrong. Her story doesn't make much sense though when put side by side with her emails. She's already said she will help 'take down' Brooke. This is the answer Jacque wanted, he manipulated her into it, so why when the time came would he have her walk out and fail to have her 'help' him as he had wanted?
I agree. She didn't just watch tv with Brooke and leave. I think we will find later that she took part in the torture or the sexual assault. Brooke, imo, did not go willingly up those stairs with MJ. You are right...I think at that point Brooke did know because I think it was being openly discussed between MJ and AR as soon as they got her back in the car on the way home. They were telling her the things to come as part of the mental torture.
 
  • #404
I have always said we need to put them on an island surrounded by shark infested waters. Let them be self sufficient . But no children , no visitors, no dropped in cell phones or computers. If they want to have an orderly society then by all means police their selves. Otherwise may they enjoy their final days there, worried about the guy across the street that keeps following him.
my 2cents
Funny because my idea is drop them in the middle of a war zone with a gun, one bullet, and let them fight their way back to the US. If they get back alive, THEN we put them in their own community...in Siberia. (Why give them a tropical paradise?!)
 
  • #405
I agree. She didn't just watch tv with Brooke and leave. I think we will find later that she took part in the torture or the sexual assault. Brooke, imo, did not go willingly up those stairs with MJ. You are right...I think at that point Brooke did know because I think it was being openly discussed between MJ and AR as soon as they got her back in the car on the way home. They were telling her the things to come as part of the mental torture.


I wonder why he choose Brooke, though. If he just wanted a sex slave or to rape and kill some young girl for the fun of it he could have gone to Boston and found a transient/runaway.

Doing this to his own niece and involving his highly mentally unbalanced 14 year old step daughter and her boyfriend..why? It doesn't get riskier than abducting a relative and using two teenagers as accomplices.

Was he obsessed w/Brooke? Did Brooke know something about his abuse of AR? Had he by that time become totally unhinged from reality and his control of AR made him think he could pull this off?

I can't get beyond the fact that AR COULD have stalled...she could have failed to get the BF semen, could have put up all kinds of roadblocks to this without ever telling Jacque no and she didn't.
 
  • #406
Funny because my idea is drop them in the middle of a war zone with a gun, one bullet, and let them fight their way back to the US. If they get back alive, THEN we put them in their own community...in Siberia. (Why give them a tropical paradise?!)

there are several islands that are not paradise. besides I don't want them to come back or have a way out. no nothing...
and no communication with the outside world. For once a man could be an island to himself and no one would care.
 
  • #407
Alcide J Jacques 1916 E Bethel Rd - can't positively tie them together yet - but I am thinking this is MJ grandfather.
 
  • #408
I wonder why he choose Brooke, though. If he just wanted a sex slave or to rape and kill some young girl for the fun of it he could have gone to Boston and found a transient/runaway.

Doing this to his own niece and involving his highly mentally unbalanced 14 year old step daughter and her boyfriend..why? It doesn't get riskier than abducting a relative and using two teenagers as accomplices.

Was he obsessed w/Brooke? Did Brooke know something about his abuse of AR? Had he by that time become totally unhinged from reality and his control of AR made him think he could pull this off?

I can't get beyond the fact that AR COULD have stalled...she could have failed to get the BF semen, could have put up all kinds of roadblocks to this without ever telling Jacque no and she didn't.
Yes, I do think he was obsessed with Brooke in his sexual fantasy. I thought about his motives and this is the only one that fits, imo. If he simply wanted to shut her up, he would have just gotten rid of her without the elaborate ruse and the rest. She was to fulfill that fantasy as part of his plan. It has always been all about MJ and his sick sexual fantasies from the time he was a child.
 
  • #409
Alcide J Jacques 1916 E Bethel Rd - can't positively tie them together yet - but I am thinking this is MJ grandfather.
How far is that from MJ's house?
 
  • #410
I have always said we need to put them on an island surrounded by shark infested waters. Let them be self sufficient . But no children , no visitors, no dropped in cell phones or computers. If they want to have an orderly society then by all means police their selves. Otherwise may they enjoy their final days there, worried about the guy across the street that keeps following him.
my 2cents
:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
If they cant be put to death then this is my second choice and as FAR away from children as possible!
 
  • #411
Yes, I do think he was obsessed with Brooke in his sexual fantasy. I thought about his motives and this is the only one that fits, imo. If he simply wanted to shut her up, he would have just gotten rid of her without the elaborate ruse and the rest. She was to fulfill that fantasy as part of his plan. It has always been all about MJ and his sick sexual fantasies from the time he was a child.

Why wait until she was 12? He allegedly started raping his relative from the first case in the 1980's when she was 8, he started raping AR when she was 9...I think we are still missing a lot of the story on why, and what happened.
 
  • #412
  • #413
This just gets more confusing lol - also at 1916 E Bethel a Lilla M Woodard (which is Denises maiden name)
 
  • #414
Indeed so. Never meant to imply that I thought he wasn't nor that he didn't deserve any horrible things he gets. IMHO, the DP is far too merciful for this 🤬🤬🤬.

Just meant to point out that we don't have all of the facts regarding intent and circumstances yet.

I think what LE is trying to tell us with the charges and death linked to kidnap, is IF someone dies during another crime, doesn't matter if you meant them to die, it's still 'murder.'

They may try to get it changed to 'manslaughter,'.... but it's murder just the same.

I still believe he meant to kill her. By trying to frame the b/f, it seems that the only way that would work is if Brooke never came forward to discredit that. The only way to insure that would be if she was dead.

JMHO
fran
 
  • #415
snipIt is EXACTLY the sort of thing you tell a child.


Yes, it IS. My daughters have a RSO that lives directly behind them at their father's house. They are there (at their dad's, that is) every weekend. They are fully aware and know what his offenses were. They know if they so much as see him out in his yard they are to go back inside.
We talk about this type of thing regularly at my house. And they have a "Child Lures" class they do every year where they take taekwon do.They didn't want to go to that class but I made them. Now they are going to be helping to teach it to the younger kids. They are 16 now. I also have a 12 y.o. daughter.
Anyway, went off on a little tangent there but....it is definitely something you tell a child. Morons!
 
  • #416
Why wait until she was 12? He allegedly started raping his relative from the first case in the 1980's when she was 8, he started raping AR when she was 9...I think we are still missing a lot of the story on why, and what happened.

I posted an article about Brooke a few minutes ago in the news section. Her basketball coach said she was very agressive. Sounds like she didn't take any cra* on the basketball court, which means she may have been that way in her daily life as well.

I'm leaning more toward the idea that Brooke may have found out about the 'organization,' and maybe even her cousin's involvement. That could explain a lot of this, IMO! It could even explain the ex step dad getting involved too.

One goes down, they all go down.

JMHO
fran
 
  • #417
Why wait until she was 12? He allegedly started raping his relative from the first case in the 1980's when she was 8, he started raping AR when she was 9...I think we are still missing a lot of the story on why, and what happened.


I agree!
 
  • #418
1930 census Williamstown, Orange, Vermont
Alcide jacques born 1916. French Canadian, came to US in 1919. Farmers.
 
  • #419
MJ's address is 1850, so close!

I just did a Google map search and the two addresses - 1850 and 1916 are actually "next door" so to speak. There's probably about 500 feet between the two - just my rough estimate. But there's no other homes in between the two.
 
  • #420
Hi All, and a Happy and Safe July 4th to you all...

Newbie here, been reading this entire subject from the beginning thread, (and have also perused WS off and on in the past).

I've got alot of reading to catch up on today though, I took a three hour break and now I'm way behind. :-D

But glad to be a part of WS. Give me awhile to catch up, and I'll be throwing in my thoughts and opinions as well :-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
2,999
Total visitors
3,130

Forum statistics

Threads
632,567
Messages
18,628,506
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top