- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,673
- Reaction score
- 17,074
Does anyone remember if the home had basement/cellar? I think they were in the basement.
I don't think it does have a basement. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong.
Does anyone remember if the home had basement/cellar? I think they were in the basement.
Well in answer to your question I sincerely believe that any statements unconfirmed and not supported by any other information from anyone to the media - which in effect are just opinions - before an anticipated trial could be considered as 'undue influence' to the jury.
Different countries and different laws of course, but in the UK "sub judice" carries a lot of weight. Once a charge has been brought it is not admissible for the media to print anything which may influence an upcoming case.
IMOO the stories various 'family and friends' are providing to the media have not been corroborated at all and frankly should be considered "gossip".
They have anything pertinent to say, say it to LE. AIMOO of course from the other side of the pond.
http://www.vgso.vic.gov.au/content/refresher-sub-judice-contempt-publish-or-not-publish
On occasion, it is permissible to publish material about upcoming court cases, but commonly, publishing such material may result in the publisher committing the common law offence of sub-judice contempt. For details about this common law offence and how to avoid it, read on.
What is sub judice contempt?
Sub judice contempt is the common law offence of publishing material which has a tendency to interfere with the administration of justice while proceedings are sub judice; that is, under a judge.
The rationale for the offence is to avoid the possibility of a trial by media by prohibiting the publication of material which might either prejudice issues at stake in criminal proceedings, or which might influence or place pressure on persons involved in the proceedings, including jurors, witnesses or potential witnesses.
In order to prove a charge of sub judice contempt, it must be proven to the criminal standard that:
a) material was published;
b) the publication of that material happened while the proceedings were sub judice; and
c) the publication has the tendency to interfere with the administration of justice in the proceedings that are before the judge.
Who can commit the offence?
Anyone involved in publishing information that is sub judice can be held liable for the offence of sub judice contempt. Most commonly, courts have held that people who have actual control over the content, production, distribution and broadcasting of sub judice material can be persons involved in publishing that material.
Importantly, it is not necessary to prove that a person intended to interfere with the administration of justice by publishing the material[1]. Consequently, a person may commit the offence unintentionally.
Just like my ex. When we figured it up, he was receiving at least 1200-1400 calories a day via alcohol and pop He was only around 5'6, and that was pushing it on a good day, and I'd say med boned for a man. When we were together, I cooked fairly large, sit down, family style, meals every night. He still drank a lot of calories during that time too, and even though he was more active, and working then, he got a bit overweight during that time...
When we split he just drank. Period. He couldn't boil water and wouldn't even heat anything up for himself in the microwave. However, although he was sedentary (very, very, very sedentary), and was getting at least 1,200-1400 calories, via alcohol and pop, yet he was still severely malnourished. He was getting calories, but zero, to little, nourishment.
Also, his friends, and our son, saw him regularly, so they didn't see the change. It was slow, so their eyes adapted to the physical change. I didn't really notice because he was always sitting down when I saw him or he had on a baggy shirt, and sweats. I knew that he looked like Hell but he was an alcoholic who'd, sadly, lost any interest in his appearance quite some time ago.
The link below is about nutrition, hunger, and malnutrition. Even if the kids had gotten a Taco Bell soft taco (170 calories) and a large pop (380 calories), one time per day, for years, there would not have been enough calories or nutrients to keep them from becoming malnourished.
http://kidshealth.org/en/teens/hunger.html
I agree w/ you. Assisted Living facilities are businesses geared to helping w/ necessary physical needs. What about
their EMOTIONAL NEEDS? IMO, these children all need one on one help like you'd receive from someone who
truly cares about you as a person.
Assisted Living facilities are institutions with their own rules to make the workers' lives easier. They don't necessarily
think about the patient's needs but mainly the ability of the patient to fit into the institution's needs.
I'm really worried about these older children. they've already lost many, many years of learning how to be a happy, well adjusted, good citizen with a fulfilling life. Seems to me the state/county is shutting down any attempt at helping them grow into 'normal' adult lives.
Maybe I'm being unrealistic and the authorities know the adult children will never be capable of independent living.
But I've seen enough assisted living facilities and group homes to be very disappointed that the adults will be placed there.
Turpin court case may need to be moved outside of Riverside county due to difficulty finding an impartial jury.
https://www.desertsun.com/story/new...rside-county-defense-attorney-say/1060361001/
I agree. At first we were supposed to believe the 17yo--and therefore all the kids---had only had a 1st grade education.
Now we learn that the parents arranged for the oldest son to attend college, where he maintained a nearly-perfect gpa. (He wasn't taking the hardest courses in the world, but I imagine any accredited college is going to make homeschooled children who can't prove academic rigor take remedial classes to show they are college-ready.)
We learn that two of the daughters would be out of the home getting mail at the mailbox.
We learn that they participated in a Christmas decoration contest, and five of the children attended the award ceremony. It's not like they were recluses, necessarily. A recluse would not participate in neighborhood events.
They've taken kids out to Las Vegas and Disneyland, Krispy Kreme donuts, pictures by the lake.
This paints a far different picture to the one given by the DA, who made it sound like they were living in a dungeon.
I don't know what to think at this point. I do believe the children were not given adequate nutrition or medical/dental care. As I said before, we've only scratched the surface of this case, and the information we've been given so far is highly tilted in favor of the state's position.
I'm wondering if DT's father has some dementia issues going on. My father does and he's very stubborn when questioned. Notice that they haven't been offering opinions lately. I also think they live a sheltered life and don't realize how this has impacted everyone that reads it. They may very have thought last week that it was a local thing.
ETA: I agree the siblings don't need to be around any "family"! They need to be protected.
You CAN get IV meds at home. Many people do. They have to be administered by a licensed medical professional. Insurance companies even like this arrangement because it’s cheaper than going to a hospital.
Skilled nursing facilities should have plenty of staff to handle IVs.
This was not based on your fantasy.I didnt want my fantasy of neighboring homes (adults and kids) to turn into a fact on this board.
When a foster home was announced, it was for two homes for the kids (i.e. not the adults). The arrangements may now have changed.
This is slightly off topic, but one of my brothers had a seizure and then was unresponsive for a while overnight. He is now in the hospital while they try to figure out whats going on (he has a history of a brain tumor, so anything like this is potentially serious). I am at the airport preparing to leave on a work trip. We havent lived together for over 35 years and we are at opposite ends of the political spectrum, but I would give anything to be by his side right now. I cant imagine how this feels for the children. [emoji22]
I agree. At first we were supposed to believe the 17yo--and therefore all the kids---had only had a 1st grade education.
Now we learn that the parents arranged for the oldest son to attend college, where he maintained a nearly-perfect gpa. (He wasn't taking the hardest courses in the world, but I imagine any accredited college is going to make homeschooled children who can't prove academic rigor take remedial classes to show they are college-ready.)
We learn that two of the daughters would be out of the home getting mail at the mailbox.
We learn that they participated in a Christmas decoration contest, and five of the children attended the award ceremony. It's not like they were recluses, necessarily. A recluse would not participate in neighborhood events.
They've taken kids out to Las Vegas and Disneyland, Krispy Kreme donuts, pictures by the lake.
This paints a far different picture to the one given by the DA, who made it sound like they were living in a dungeon.
I don't know what to think at this point. I do believe the children were not given adequate nutrition or medical/dental care. As I said before, we've only scratched the surface of this case, and the information we've been given so far is highly tilted in favor of the state's position.
Does anyone remember if the home had basement/cellar? I think they were in the basement.
I'm the same. No doubt they have suffered awful abuse at the hands of their parents, but I also don't think they were absolute prisoners also. They were not totally hidden from society.
UGH. They will not receive intensive, individualized care that they need if the facility is anything like the expensive one I had my mom with alzheimers at briefly. Staff were all very nice, but there was only one nurse, and grossly untrained and underpaid staff with constant turnover. I hope that isn't the case for these kids.
So we all think of old folks homes. But I think you're talking about a form of group home? With medical care? Is that right?
Well sure. These are media interviews with family members, accounts from people who knew the family. It's just like anyone else who speaks of their experience about anything. I think these interviews are very important and useful to anyone interested and concerned about what happened to the children. If every account had to be corroborated, we wouldn't be talking on this board today.
Even if the children qualify for Medicaid or Medicare and their medical needs taken care of, we're still looking at housing in southern California which is one of the most expensive real estate markets in the country. $200,000 would barely cover the cost of a 1-bedroom condo in some places. So yes, you're right. That money isn't going to stretch far, for sure.
I agree. At first we were supposed to believe the 17yo--and therefore all the kids---had only had a 1st grade education.
Now we learn that the parents arranged for the oldest son to attend college, where he maintained a nearly-perfect gpa. (He wasn't taking the hardest courses in the world, but I imagine any accredited college is going to make homeschooled children who can't prove academic rigor take remedial classes to show they are college-ready.)
We learn that two of the daughters would be out of the home getting mail at the mailbox.
We learn that they participated in a Christmas decoration contest, and five of the children attended the award ceremony. It's not like they were recluses, necessarily. A recluse would not participate in neighborhood events.
They've taken kids out to Las Vegas and Disneyland, Krispy Kreme donuts, pictures by the lake.
This paints a far different picture to the one given by the DA, who made it sound like they were living in a dungeon.
I don't know what to think at this point. I do believe the children were not given adequate nutrition or medical/dental care. As I said before, we've only scratched the surface of this case, and the information we've been given so far is highly tilted in favor of the state's position.
Snip
Another relative, David's brother, Randy Turpin, is the president of a Christian college in Ohio. He wrote a book about the spiritual benefits of fasting.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/califo...orrors-to-face-restraining-order-13-children/
A source close to the investigation told CBS News Randy told authorities in California on Tuesday that he wanted to explore the possibility of adopting the children.