- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 6,679
- Reaction score
- 47,664
There is a new “closed” case discussion FB group for Barbara. Can’t link it because it’s not official.
well that's helpful.
sarcasm aside, I really do hope it is though.
There is a new “closed” case discussion FB group for Barbara. Can’t link it because it’s not official.
Do you mean the case is closed, or it is a “closed” FB group?There is a new “closed” case discussion FB group for Barbara. Can’t link it because it’s not official.
I’m glad you remembered reading that RT had her phone in his pack. I read that and I think it also said and her shirt.
I'm reading about a case now - an eight year old girl separated from her parents in northern New Mexico. Even with searches which began a few hours after she went missing, she was found four days later, well outside the original search area - 3.2 miles away. Hiding in thick brush. I'm surprised they found her.
Forgive me for asking this. Barbara and her husband wouldn't have taken any mind altering substances like LSD. I'm probably just going with desert and California equals hippies. Sorry. I'm trying to think of a reason you would lose someone you are following in a well lit flatish area.
Who found her? Continued efforts by LE/ Family? Locals?
Ground search team led by trained professionals. By the time they found her, she was "hypothermic and unresponsive."
imo deceased.....180 degrees opposite direction from where the search was with their home running through the middle like a line.Question to all, where do you think Barbara is?
What is a ground search team led by professionals?
Locals with LE?
Private investigators?
What/who comprised the ground search team and who were the professionals?
It's great that they found her, and maybe this will help in future SAR efforts.
But to educate others, we need the details. Like hug a tree. And another sleuther added to my hug a tree post, climb the tree if you can, to get a perspective on your location.
If you keep moving around while you are lost, you are a moving target. It is so much easier to hit a target that is still.
I've edited it to include the story as published.
http://www.saraz.org/documents/AZBasicSAR.pdf may also be useful, it's a SAR guide for Arizona, which should be close to California in terms of climate of the area where BT is missing.
Page 172 has percentiles for distance traveled by lost people in their dataset for Arizona. For the elderly, 50% chance they are within 1.39 miles; 75% chance within 5.60 miles. Trivia, if you wanted to search a 5.6 mile radius around the last known location, that's 98.52 square miles you are searching.
I think the most likely ‘mind altering substance’ is simply dehydration in the blazing sun. Someone on an earlier page/thread pointed out that sunstroke can create euphoria. And dehydration can create disorientation—
Closed Facebook group. Meaning it’s not out there for the public to read. Members only can read the comments.Do you mean the case is closed, or it is a “closed” FB group?
I'm still holding out for a magical mystery tour with a VW Van full of happy hippies, or that she jumped in a maserati with Fabio on his way to a gig in Vegas. But sadly, I admit k-mac, your theory sounds the most probable.imo deceased.....180 degrees opposite direction from where the search was with their home running through the middle like a line.
speculative of course.
moo
I don't like it roses :-(I'm still holding out for a magical mystery tour with a VW Van full of happy hippies, or that she jumped in a maserati with Fabio on his way to a gig in Vegas. But sadly, I admit k-mac, your theory sounds the most probable.
Amateur opinion and speculation
Search science is no joke, and holy crap that's a lot of ground to cover.
Why did Robert take a polygraph? Did he volunteer to take it to prove his innocence? Was he asked to take a polygraph by LE? Could he have refused if he did not want to take it?
Robert, in the meantime, said in an interview with Insider Edition saying that he had failed the polygraph test and was the prime suspect. "Yes, I took a polygraph test. They told me I was being deceptive. I know that polygraphs aren't 100 percent and I hadn't had any sleep. The police consider me the prime suspect because it was just the two of us."
I read the interview a couple of days ago and felt neutral but then actually listened to it just last night. He says he thinks she was taken because “she WAS wearing bikini and carrying a beer.” Like, well of COURSE that would make someone grab her. The emphasis made it “read” differently to me.