So why didn't the searchers and LE think of that and start looking for her in completely different areas. She could have stopped to pee and then took off, knowing she could get into the RV if she wanted to.(raises hand)
That's very peculiar, IMHO.
So why didn't the searchers and LE think of that and start looking for her in completely different areas. She could have stopped to pee and then took off, knowing she could get into the RV if she wanted to.(raises hand)
That's very peculiar, IMHO.
If the FBI is involved they are investigating elsewhere. Local LE searched the area extensively and did not find her so no need, at least for now.Somehow I can't see the FBI traipsing through the desert because that will have to be done! FBI never found 13 year old Jamie Closs. She had to help herself.
I just gave a scenario, since so many are on the bandwagon he did something to her. I still think she wandered away and is out there.If so, then why tell the story he did? it would make more sense if they went in different directions because of different interests and she just never found her way back.
Maybe it means that they planned to go in different directions while out hiking but I think that’s unlikely. I think the key was possibly placed under a rock in case they accidentally got separated or because they felt the key was safer hidden under a rock than in RT’s bag/pocket where it could possibly get lost and not found in the desert.Yes she could have got angry with him and said she was done. He could have hit her and hidden her body. I don't believe this happened and I HOPE it did not. What gets me, is putting the key under the rock. THAT tells me they were going to go in different directions out there! Anybody else think that?!
If the FBI has this case..
Silence is normal.
That is the only logical reason for total silence I can think of..
jmho
BBMSo they hide the key under a rock? Why not take it with them? They had a camera (or cell phone) a six pack, some water, and they did start out their hike together, correct?
Missing Hiker's Husband Says Police Are Eyeing Him As Suspect
Excellent observation. From day 1, nobody has been looking for RT, only BT. Maybe someone saw him, but not her. I want to know if someone saw him in the period of time that he was allegedly frantically searching for her. Did he flag down any passing cars? Did anyone see him on his way back to the road to see if she was in the RV? Etc.SABBM
Good observation.
Even if the security cams only showed RT, it would help to place at least him there.
Welcome to Websleuths, @campbellsouup !!
i totally agree there are photos of barbara there when robert said she was there.-bolded by me-
Would it help if I said there are, several?
I think it is time this fact being injected into the discussion, pages and pages of accusations made towards RT, a victim, his adres and hang out locations being know.
He is a 72 yo man, most probably lost his wife.
Who knows which kind of person not in his right mind reading all these accusations and harming the man?
I think it is only fair to insert there is evidence of Barbara of their hike, time stamped, I am saying this to protect a man who is considered a victim by Websleuths TOS.
I am doing my utmost at this point, for the person who can confirm this to do so, please have a little patience.
Till then you are free to consider it speculation by me (which it isn't).
A person with control issues might not allow a partner to have a key.So maybe there's one key. Maybe in the past one might want to return or needs a bathroom so this has become their habit.
IMO, there would be two keys for a new rig but old habits die hard.
That said, I'm going to repeat myself now - people who are deceitful usually include bits of the truth. The problem with this story is that it reads like a novel.
<modsnip: quoted post was removed>
The most dangerous time in a relationship for a woman is when she is either pregnant or trying to leave. I think we can assume BT was not the former but perhaps the latter.
That's not unusual for us.Without more definite info all we are doing is talking in circles here.
Victims include family members and loved ones, so we ask that members not express opinions that include insinuations or inferences that a loved one is responsible for the missing person's disappearance. IOW, no direct or indirect accusations / inferences against a person who LE has not officially designated a POI / suspect.
Imagine how any one of us would feel to make such inferences only to find those inferences were simply wrong. Nothing worse than re-victimizing someone who is already a victim and nobody wants to have to eat their words.
Sometimes what seems so apparent is just plain wrong. We've seen it happen before and it's not pleasant. First case that brought me to WS, I knew darn well whodunnit and I think everybody else agreed with me on my whodunnit. We were 110% wrong !!
New MISSING PERSONS flyer for areas around Bullhead, Laughlin, Needles, Las Vegas.
Please share and spread the word!
![]()
RT said he thought she would be taken to the Las Vegas area.. So that abduction would cross state lines making it a federal offense .. That could bring in the FBIIf the FBI has this case..
Silence is normal.
That is the only logical reason for total silence I can think of..
jmho