CharlestonGal
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- 47,452
I think this case is deader than a doornail. But, BT's son's FB is interesting, to say the least.
I don't know how long it was.How long do you believe he waited to call? There have been several times floated here.
My money is on their having a disagreement,not necessarily anything major, and she stormed off. Understandably he wouldn't want to disclose that detail to the media or the wider public, but he may have admitted it to the police.
It doesn't really bother me. It strikes me as two-fold.The unusual element regarding the beer is that RT seemed to emphasize that a woman carrying a beer while walking in the desert and wearing a bikini is an enticement for abductors. That comment still bothers me. I would like to hear RT's explanation for such a belief. Maybe RT only emphasized the beer aspect in case someone should come across a bikini-clad woman desert walker AND she's carrying a beer... that's BT! Carrying a water or soda pop? Nope. Not BT.
By all indications the Thomas’s were not on Facebook nor has there been any social media trail so it seems a stretch that Robert would be up to the minute on their page.
Was it a public Facebook? If not is there any proof that Robert followed the family Facebook?
Inyo County is what 5 hours 300 miles away from Mojave? I don’t get the leap to Robert being so interested in SP’s case.
The stories aren’t even the same in the least. Car verses back country creeper. Desolate campsite and well-traveled road.
I can find the abducted from the road viable it is more, to me, the way it was presented by RT.
All imo
Agreed.It matters not whether RT was on social media.
Element of interest:
Why did the T's also have beer? Even though beer has a diuretic effect (from alcohol), it contains calories (energy) and provides water for hydration. Maybe the Ts's purchased a high malt (more calories) and low alcohol (2-3% max) content beer. That BT was drinking beer is not so unusual a practice for some desert explorers. The unusual element regarding the beer is that RT seemed to emphasize that a woman carrying a beer while walking in the desert and wearing a bikini is an enticement for abductors. That comment still bothers me. I would like to hear RT's explanation for such a belief. Maybe RT only emphasized the beer aspect in case someone should come across a bikini-clad woman desert walker AND she's carrying a beer... that's BT! Carrying a water or soda pop? Nope. Not BT.
I apologize if this question has been asked and answered: did LE/SAR search mine shafts/breaches in the general area of a few square miles surrounding the reported 'last known location' of BT?
A lot of folks have been wondering why more info hasn't been forthcoming from LE, or additional searches organized. I *speculate* that the last thing LE needs are a bunch of (well meaning) amateurs out there looking for Barb, and they themselves requiring a rescue. It's just too hot and dangerous for untrained folks to be out there searching.
Amateur opinion and speculation
Actually I would've thought if LE suspected foul play-- they wouldn't be asking for help from the public, as they're following up on clues from the photos or other leads.
Who knows ?
LE's silence is suspicious.
Finding Barbara or what's happened is the main objective.
MOO
But BT was already on the trail. She did not need to cut across the desert because she was on the trail, in sight of the RV, and only 1/4 of a mile from the a/c and cold water.
Also last photos of Mollie, Kelsey, Maleah, Hania, Mackenzie, Serenity... SOP
View attachment 199829 View attachment 199830
If BT took a wrong turn and ended up at the road but not near the RV, I wonder if there are any culverts under the road and whether they might have appeared to offer shade to someone overcome by heat.
Meanwhile, they gave RT a polygraph and a couple of days after the search ended, RT got a lawyer (who is, I believe, a criminal defense attorney - can someone confirm?)
Which trail ?
They are unmarked, some are not as defined, so that perhaps is where my confusion is ?
View attachment 199982
This is the trailhead for the main trail. This is immediately across the road from where the RV was parked when LE got there. If you were standing there, behind you would be Hidden Hill Road, which is shown by SAR photos as being searched on about day 3. But according to RT, they took this trail. If you look at the pictures we've posted of the area, this trail goes "straight" to the Granite Hills, but there is an intersecting, somewhat narrower trail about 1/4 mile in. If you head right on that trial you get to some climbable boulders and the dry creek bed. If you go left on that trail you walk parallel to the road until it comes out onto the road about a mile south of this spot.
We don't know exactly where RT and Barbara separated. He likely took one of the trails down to the creek bed, since early on, one reporter says he went to a "dry lake" to take pictures. If she followed him briefly on that side trail, then coming back, she'd have to make a turn to get back on this trail. If she never left this trail - well, you can see that it's plainly a trail and it would be very hard to get lost on it. RT says they were a mere quarter mile or so from the road when he decided to get off the main trail to take pictures...
Nope, no culverts there. Really, at that point, her best chance would have been to flag someone down.