I get that people want to think that Uber is a safe and trustworthy company and they cooperated in finding Beau 100% and they wouldn't cover for a driver behaving suspiciously. After all, it's pretty hard to find a taxi these days.
I personally haven't gotten those impressions of Uber and the Uber driver in this case though. I cannot get over Beau's emergency call to Uber in the car or the fact that Beau was never seen again after that ride, nor the driver's changing story. I don't believe for a second that the driver just
forgot a person who made an emergency call from their cab! (For example, I used to be a yoga teacher. Hundreds of people took my classes over the years. Like an Uber driver with hundreds of passengers, I probably wouldn't remember many of them even a week or two after they came to my class, especially those who only showed up once. But the
one student who ever got injured in my class? I still remember her face and name--Jean--13 years later! She stumbled in a crow pose arm balance and bloodied her lip. It wasn't even such a bad injury, and I had experienced a traumatic brain injury just a few years before, but I have a crystal clear memory of that and her. Our brains record out-of-the-ordinary, emotionally charged experiences as part of our survival mechanism.)
Anyway, there are a couple of articles in the Washington Post today that strengthen my position that Uber is only out to cover its but and protect its bottom line, even at the expense of dishonesty and putting employees and passengers in danger. I believe more strongly than ever the driver
must be investigated thoroughly and that Uber is more interested in avoiding or delaying a potential lawsuit or bad press than helping to find Beau.