- Joined
- Jul 7, 2018
- Messages
- 36,961
- Reaction score
- 243,411
Interesting they would release this right before Woodward is sentenced on October 22nd, they should have closed this with his sentence which I still strongly believe will be life without parole. Thank you for sharing this, I would have not searched for this until a few weeks later in November or December.
Interesting they would release this right before Woodward is sentenced on October 22nd, they should have closed this with his sentence which I still strongly believe will be life without parole. Thank you for sharing this, I would have not searched for this until a few weeks later in November or December.
Scheduled Hearings
Date Time Hearing Type - Reason Courtroom 10/25/2024 09:00 AM Sentencing and Firearms Relinquishment - C30
Heard Hearings
Date Time Hearing Type - Reason Courtroom Hearing Status 07/03/2024 08:00 AM Jury Trial - C30 Heard
Interesting they would release this right before Woodward is sentenced on October 22nd, they should have closed this with his sentence which I still strongly believe will be life without parole. Thank you for sharing this, I would have not searched for this until a few weeks later in November or December.
Thank you! I was confused when it said Oct 22 when Oct 25 had been previously stated. Thank you for confirming once again!Just wanted to make sure everyone has the correct date for sentencing. As you can see on Jash's post above from the Court site - it is on Oct. 25th - not the 22nd....![]()
What does this mean "Firearms Relinquishment"? I thought that happens at the time of arrest.Just wanted to make sure everyone has the correct date for sentencing. As you can see on Jash's post above from the Court site - it is on Oct. 25th - not the 22nd....![]()
What does this mean "Firearms Relinquishment"? I thought that happens at the time of arrest.
What does this mean "Firearms Relinquishment"? I thought that happens at the time of arrest.
That's all BS victim-blaming that he should have put up during the trial, not after.In a shocking twist, Woodward's defense attorney conceded that his client killed Blaze, but said that it was not a premeditated hate crime. Woodward's attorney claimed he joined the extremist group because of isolation and loneliness.
The defense said that Woodward himself was struggling with his sexuality, although Woodward denied that characterization when he took the stand to testify in his own defense. Woodward claimed that he fell asleep while at the park with Blaze and alleged that he awoke to discover Blaze photographing or video recording their encounter with his cellphone.
Woodward claimed that he was horrified at the idea that Blaze might publicly share a compromising picture of him and that this alleged discovery provoked him to stab Blaze repeatedly. However, investigators from the Orange County Sheriff's Department told "20/20" that they found no photographs or videos from that night on Blaze’s phone.
At the conclusion of the trial, Jeanne Pepper Bernstein made a statement to the assembled media.
"We are thrilled with the verdict, which holds Samuel Woodward accountable for the brutal, violent, painful murder of our son," she said, in part. "Justice has been served."
![]()
Murdered Ivy League student's family reflects upon the days after his disappearance
"20/20" explores the murder of Blaze Bernstein, who was killed by former classmate Sam Woodward in 2018.abcnews.go.com
After I saw your post I was thinking of watching it but maybe won't now. I totally think this is what happened as well.Okay, so after watching the 20/20 special, I really didn't learn anything new about this case, except seeing Woodward's parents testimony. To me they are in denial about their son being a NeoNazi. I also don't believe that his autism is what caused him to join Atomwaffen, nor do I believe that Blaze was out to out him. I believe that he lured Blaze to the park with the intention to kill him- double score since Blaze was Jewish and gay, and that he sent the text message to Blaze's friend about doing something bad. There was no evidence of Blaze having taken pictures of Woodward.
I'll admit I was only half-paying attention to the episode, but it seemed like it really glossed over the last text messages and why they weren't part of the trial... especially for an episode titled "The Last Text."Okay, so after watching the 20/20 special, I really didn't learn anything new about this case, except seeing Woodward's parents testimony. To me they are in denial about their son being a NeoNazi. I also don't believe that his autism is what caused him to join Atomwaffen, nor do I believe that Blaze was out to out him. I believe that he lured Blaze to the park with the intention to kill him- double score since Blaze was Jewish and gay, and that he sent the text message to Blaze's friend about doing something bad. There was no evidence of Blaze having taken pictures of Woodward.