CA CA - Corona, WhtFem 711UFCA, 17-21, blonde, in shallow grave, Dec'81

[digitective]

Has she ever been compared to Mary Francis Gregory?
View attachment 423443

Mary is not on her list of ruleouts, so I don't think so. The pictures look similar and some of the details aligns, so I think it's worth submitting.

She was last seen in Las Vegas, and Corona is 243 miles away. Height is 5" off and weight is 22 lbs off but that's just an estimate.

 

[digitective]

Maybe this girl made it to a road and got picked up by someone. Looks like a possible match. 4601DFCA - Stacey Ann Arras

I think she's worth submitting -- the pictures are similar and they even have the same winged hairstyle.

The age is 3 years off, height is 3" off and weight is 13 lbs off but all those things are just estimates. Yosemite is 325 miles from Corona.

 

[digitective]

How about Tammy Rose Surdam? She went missing kinda far from where Corona Doe was found, but height, weight, hair match. According to the circumstances of her disappearance on NamUs she was a chronic runaway.

Agree the distance is far but you never know where runaways might hitch a ride or take a bus to. Age is 2+ years off but Jane Doe's is just an estimate. They have the same winged hairstyle in the pictures.

I think it's worth submitting!

 

[Susanna Richmond]

I wish we had a picture of her.

 

[Susanna Richmond]

http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/r/reglar_yvonne.html (her name is misspelled "Reglar" in some sources)

On the Yvonne Regler GBNF 1970's thread, Yvonne's niece (lesalia17) showed up and made a few comments.

OH - Yvonne Regler, 17, Fairview Park, 8 Aug 1977

Since the only photo available of Yvonne was of very poor quality, I asked her if she had any additional photos of Yvonne. She provided three additional photos of Yvonne, two of which give very good looks at her teeth. (I did some significant restoration of one of the photos, so I am showing this one which is hasn't been altered).

When I looked closely at her teeth, I noticed that her #7 and #10 are peg teeth, just as is described of this Jane Doe:

Here is the photo of Yvonne's teeth, and an enhancement of the same photo to emphasize the shapes of her teeth.

UP7138 - Dental Comments


If you add in that Yvonne was tall (as was the Jane Doe), fits the age specs, and and bears a reasonable resemblance to the recon. This might be worth a look.

Agreed?

She looks just like the artists sketch!

 

[HmmMysterious]

She looks just like the artists sketch!

Both Yvonne and the Jane Doe have DNA in CODIS which makes Yvonne an automatic rule-out.

 

[FlyOfDragons]

These are Jane Doe's current rule-outs. The ten without their case numbers listed are still missing and have NamUs profiles, their cases just aren't linked on this exclusion list for some reason. Also, Carol Lubahn is present on Jane Doe's exclusion list three separate times, including once unlinked.

Of the nine unlinked MPs (excluding the second extra Carol Lubahn), only one of them — Kimberly Kahler — actually has Jane Doe on their own exclusion list.

 

[LucyOso]

Following. Do we have any other sketches or images of her? I couldn't find the NAMUS link,

 

[The4TierBridge]

Following. Do we have any other sketches or images of her? I couldn't find the NAMUS link,

#UP7138: The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

 

[theshadow45]

Corona Jane Doe has been unidentified for 44 years today.

 

[Nate_Bro]

Both Yvonne and the Jane Doe have DNA in CODIS which makes Yvonne an automatic rule-out.

CODIS is composed of multiple separate indexes, and DNA profiles are not universally or automatically compared across all cases. Any potential match depends on whether two profiles share enough overlapping STR loci to allow a meaningful comparison, which means degraded or partial samples may be insufficient for either a confirmed match or a definitive exclusion. While CODIS can also contain mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) profiles, mtDNA cannot be directly compared to STR data; it reflects only maternal‑line inheritance and therefore cannot individually identify a person or rule out someone whose profile is based on STRs. Additionally, state laws and privacy regulations govern when and how DNA profiles may be searched or shared, so the presence of a profile in CODIS does not automatically eliminate someone as a potential match unless a documented, compatible comparison has actually been performed and resulted in a non‑match.