- Joined
- Dec 14, 2013
- Messages
- 777
- Reaction score
- 2,014
I agree; his testimony is strange. I felt second-hand embarrassment watching it since it's clear he didn't know as much as he claimed, and the prosecution likely didn't prepare him beforehand (this seems to be something of a pattern with their witnesses). On cross-examination, he didn't deny the documentation he filed in probate court, claiming that the Andersen side was entitled to part of the estate because it appeared that Kitty survived Jose by a few seconds. So weird, and it didn't seem like a move by a loving brother. I think his son disowned him over his refusal to believe Lyle and Erik. In the second trial, Brian Sr and his older brother Milton testified for the prosecution in the penalty phase, and they wanted the death penalty.I was watching the testimony of Brian Andersen Sr (Kitty's brother). It was really bizarre. He claimed that the boys would talk back to their parents constantly, but he couldn't give an example of it happening. He claimed to be the closest family member to Kitty, but didn't know much about her depression, heavily troubled marriage or the boys. He could never recall how old the boys were when he visited them, or when Eric's birthday was. He also defended Jose's illegal hand signals during a tennis match and LIED on the stand about Kitty consoling Eric afterwards. Just bizarre stuff.
Contrast his testimony to that of his ex-wife, Patricia, with whom Kitty confided that she wished she could also get a divorce.
Contrast his testimony to that of his son, Brian Jr, who actually lived with the Menendez family and experienced the abusive parents first-hand.
I also found out that Brian Sr initially refused to be a witness! In April 1992, the defense team told the family that the boys had killed their parents and wanted to finally disclose their abuse. They got crickets from Brian Sr.
In October, he petitioned the probate court to exclude the Menendez family from any money left in Jose and Kitty's estate. He wanted the money exclusively awarded to the "Andersen" side. In November, the court responded that they would not consider his petition unless or until the brothers were actually convicted.
So suddenly, 10 days before the trial, he decided to become a witness for the prosecution.
The DA's Office sought the death penalty against the Menendez brothers, who had no history of violence before killing their parents. Yet, this same DA's Office did not seek the death penalty against OJ Simpson, who not only had a history of violence but also had a history of abusing and stalking one of the people (his ex-wife) he was charged with killing. It makes no sense.
MOO
Last edited: