GUILTY CA - Ellorah Warner, 3 wks, Santa Clarita, 23 Jan 2015

  • #81
Comment by mom on the 22nd baby picture is troubling, to me. It looks like the comment was posted yesterday at 09:25 (my time, Central, which would be 07:25 in Cali, I think).

https://www.facebook.com/mwarneralone
 
  • #82
I looked up the meaning of Baby Ellorah's name and found this:

(Snip)

Film enthusiasts may think of the 1988 fantasy film Willow and its baby princess called Elora, rather than the Indian Caves.

Elora is said to be a variant of Hebrew name Eliora, the feminine form of Elior, meaning 'my God is my light'. Although the name could also be seen as a variant of Eleanor, meaning 'bright, shining one'.

-----

It would seem her name, derived from Ellorah, was chosen with great care.

It doesn't make sense.
:rose:

http://www.babynamesfromyesteryear.com/2011/11/name-in-spotlight-ellora.html?m=1

:(


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #83
I am not using the term "they". So far it is just him.

You are so right! For the last 15 minutes I've been trying to correct it but my connection is awful. I've been in a panic that someone would call me out in it befor the darn page would refresh. No better sleuther to be called out by than you, Scarlett!
 
  • #84
You are so right! For the last 15 minutes I've been trying to correct it but my connection is awful. I've been in a panic that someone would call me out in it befor the darn page would refresh. No better sleuther to be called out by than you, Scarlett!

Ha.. I did not mean you call you out.. I was just talking about me and where I was at. :)

I hate hate hate when it turns out to be parents. It just makes me ill. So if at all I can hold on to just the dad and something going wrong, I will as long as I can...
 
  • #85
Comment by mom on the 22nd baby picture is troubling, to me. It looks like the comment was posted yesterday at 09:25 (my time, Central, which would be 07:25 in Cali, I think).

https://www.facebook.com/mwarneralone

I see the one you mean. Troubling? If Ellorah was not dead I would see nothing concerning about it. But yeah, in light of the fact that she is dead. That is why it is so hard for me to do this FB creeping. Because lots of perfectly innocent comments can look very different after the fact.
 
  • #86
(QUOTE=ScarlettScarpetta;11424196]I keep thinking about them going to the police station together and that just seems beyond weird. I can not think of any reason to do that? Anyone?[/QUOTE]

I don't know but the scenarios running through my mind aren't good regarding the dv shelter.maybe she was" forced" to give that story??
 
  • #87
Comment by mom on the 22nd baby picture is troubling, to me. It looks like the comment was posted yesterday at 09:25 (my time, Central, which would be 07:25 in Cali, I think).

https://www.facebook.com/mwarneralone
So, where in the timeline was this comment posted, I wonder? Before Grandma called LE? After? Ellorah wasn't reported missing until 9:35. Hmmm...
 
  • #88
I see the one you mean. Troubling? If Ellorah was not dead I would see nothing concerning about it. But yeah, in light of the fact that she is dead. That is why it is so hard for me to do this FB creeping. Because lots of perfectly innocent comments can look very different after the fact.
I dont' see anything that is troubling at all about the posts or comments.
 
  • #89
I keep thinking about them going to the police station together and that just seems beyond weird. I can not think of any reason to do that? Anyone?

with a friend too: initially I thought ''translator'' but now I think just to make sure story keeps ''straight''...KWIM
 
  • #90
Comment by mom on the 22nd baby picture is troubling, to me. It looks like the comment was posted yesterday at 09:25 (my time, Central, which would be 07:25 in Cali, I think).

https://www.facebook.com/mwarneralone

His Facebook URL that he chose is a MWarnerALONE but has both their names. She posts under her own, private page with her own name. Anyone else notice his most recent check in (ABSOLUT VODKA on Thursday)? And what about the photo with stack of cash?

HINKY!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #91
This is just so sad. Stating the obvious I know, but I just can't even imagine.
 
  • #92
The girl’s grandmother called police about an incident in relation to the family about two hours before the parents reported their child missing, officials said. Details surrounding the incident were not made available and it was unclear if the grandmother was related to the girl’s mother or father.

http://ktla.com/2015/01/24/sheriffs-deputies-helicopters-search-for-missing-3-week-old-newhall-baby/

This "incident" would be approximately 8:35 PM Cali time.

How does this coincide with the comments on the photo?

:sigh:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #93
His Facebook URL that he chose is a MWarnerALONE but has both their names. She posts under her own, private page with her own name. Anyone else notice his must recent check in (ABSOLUT VODKA on Thursday)? And what about the photo with stack of cash?

HINKY!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


bbm: I thought that was odd........
all about ME ((party night -- immature SOD))
 
  • #94
His Facebook URL that he chose is a MWarnerALONE but has both their names. She posts under her own, private page with her own name. Anyone else notice his most recent check in (ABSOLUT VODKA on Thursday)? And what about the photo with stack of cash?

HINKY!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
''
All that means is that it was once his page and now he added her. My FB url is different from my name now too.. The url stays the same no matter how long you have it or what you change your name to.
Vodka is legal so I am not sure how that matters.
 
  • #95
''
All that means is that it was once his page and now he added her. My FB url is different from my name now too.. The url stays the same no matter how long you have it or what you change your name to.
Vodka is legal so I am not sure how that matters.

I'll give you point 1. As for point two, he has no business co- sleeping of he's drinking. :moo:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #96
even if this was a death due to SIDS or co-sleeping or something similar, I think it is a crime to make false reports to LE. But articles seem to indicate MW's charges relate to Ellorah's death and that he is charged with killing her, not what took place after - as in falsely reporting her missing. Nothing I have read so far leads me to suspect abuse of a corpse (sorry to use such a term but it is the proper legal one). So yeah. I think as more facts come to light it will be easier to figure out whether this baby died by violence. With news of grandma's call coming out it seems less and less likely that this was some accident. Also note that mom is not under arrest and is reported by LE to be "distraught". Then I circle back to the at DV program address so close to the area of interest in this case.

Sigh. I guess we shall see. SurfieTX may have called this one. I sure see nothing that screams controlling abuser, but I have been wrong before and will be again.

Mom did make a curious post on Dad's FB that she was learning about the necessity to put her daughter's needs before her own....or something to that effect....

ETA: Oops, sorry, I see that has already been mentioned :).
 
  • #97
I'll give you point 1. As for point two, he has no business co- sleeping of he's drinking. :moo:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I see nothing that shows him co sleeping. Only pictures of him holding his sleeping child or laying next to her while she slept.
 
  • #98
  • #99
The day before yesterday, it appears that Dad was home alone with baby. If the absence was routine, or if mom was typically gone during that time period, Dad could have persuaded Mom to go to the police. If Mom is distraught today, she probably was last night too.
 
  • #100
''
All that means is that it was once his page and now he added her. My FB url is different from my name now too.. The url stays the same no matter how long you have it or what you change your name to.
Vodka is legal so I am not sure how that matters.

It's circumstantial evidence, IMO; same as Owen's killer. Both were pretty regular FB posters and incriminated themselves as a result.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
1,743
Total visitors
1,822

Forum statistics

Threads
632,540
Messages
18,628,141
Members
243,190
Latest member
Lamoorh
Back
Top