CA - Emma Barker, 18 mos, suffocated, Lancaster, 18 March 2009 #1

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #521
yeah - which part was the "accident" the assault or the death?:mad:
 
  • #522
Lovejac said:
I was actually hoping my post would help diffuse her anger a little, thought maybe she could use some of her energy to tell people a little bit about precious Emma. I know I would like to know more about her.
Click to expand...

Your intentions seemed clear to me...you were offering her an opening to change focus onto the victim, by asking questions about the living Emma, not prying into the family business.
I appreciate your posts...they show thought and compassion,
flourish
 
  • #523
nervous_nellie said:
yeah - which part was the "accident" the assault or the death?:mad:
Click to expand...

Hi nervous nellie,

IMO, Suffocation and death of an 18 month old baby is not an accident. It could have been deliberate, premeditated or spur of the moment. Doesn't matter. This poor baby suffered death at the hands of her mother. :mad:
 
  • #524
  • #525
dmk said:
LoveJac, just saw your latest post @KTLA.. Bravo! :clap: :clap: :clap:






http://www.ktla.com/landing_topstor...blockID=243852&feedID=1198#comment_name243852
Click to expand...

Just a sincere thanks to all who have posted on Emma's thread.

Lovejac and many of you here did not give up on finding the truth to what happened to little Emma.

I can't help but think that some of our poster's made an impact on LE in regards to Stacey's arrest.

You guy's never gave up in searching for answers. As sad as this story is, Emma's short life deserved some answers. May she rest in peace and justice be served.
 
  • #526
dmk said:
Me too.... :(

I'm wondering if they are working out some kind of plea and that's why the postponing of her arraignment today. I did see her on TV in the courtroom today, so who know? I wish all these news agencies would all report the same thing..
Click to expand...

My thinking is that she will make a plea deal. So far that we know she and her family may not be able to afford a long drawn out trial with a high-priced defense atty. Since this story was mostly under the radar as far as news reporting, my guess is that she will make a plea deal. Just my thoughts because the news coverage was very lacking.
 
  • #527
flourish said:
Your intentions seemed clear to me...you were offering her an opening to change focus onto the victim, by asking questions about the living Emma, not prying into the family business.
I appreciate your posts...they show thought and compassion,
flourish
Click to expand...


Awwww, thank's flourish, that was nice to hear :blushing:

:blowkiss:
 
  • #528
  • #529
Lovejac said:
shame on me, I didn't follow my own rule *don't speak (post) in anger*, but, DANG! I was so mad after reading Emma was suffocated........:mad:
Click to expand...

Trust me, you weren't out of order in the least bit..no worries. :hand:
 
  • #530
bogeygal said:
My thinking is that she will make a plea deal. So far that we know she and her family may not be able to afford a long drawn out trial with a high-priced defense atty. Since this story was mostly under the radar as far as news reporting, my guess is that she will make a plea deal. Just my thoughts because the news coverage was very lacking.
Click to expand...

My bold..

You can say that again!

I think you're right BG. I just feel awful for the family... they seemed to adore little Emma. Too bad the mother didn't. :confused:
 
  • #531
adnoid said:
No idea but it's pretty weird to watch.
Click to expand...


LOL- If you look closely, she is talking up to the mic. :crazy:

Looks like she was arraigned from a location other than where the judge was. She was answering the judge or court clerk who is on the other side- There should be a video in front of her and the mic on top-

Never been to court before myself, but my trusty BIL has- LOTS!!! :eek:
 
  • #532
I find it ironic that the police arrested becasue they thought she would run from grandpas? What took so freaking long to arrest her in the first place. I am obviously not a ME, but you would think that suffocation or any bruises would have def. shown up in autopsy?? :banghead:

I just dont understand.
 
  • #533
Chicogirl36 said:
I find it ironic that the police arrested becasue they thought she would run from grandpas? What took so freaking long to arrest her in the first place. I am obviously not a ME, but you would think that suffocation or any bruises would have def. shown up in autopsy?? :banghead:

I just dont understand.
Click to expand...

About the suffocation, perhaps Stacey used a pillow, blanket or her hands by covering little Emma's nose and mouth. There may have been a struggle, but either way..my goodness, an adult woman may have been able to do that rather quickly, especially if Emma was in her car seat strapped in. Thinking that no bruises would have been obvious when the body was recovered., thereby not apparent until an autopsy was completed. JMO.

I just wonder why the heck she would want to end the life of her beautiful little daughter!
 
  • #534
bogeygal said:
About the suffocation, perhaps Stacey used a pillow, blanket or her hands by covering little Emma's nose and mouth. There may have been a struggle, but either way..my goodness, an adult woman may have been able to do that rather quickly, especially if Emma was in her car seat strapped in. Thinking that no bruises would have been obvious when the body was recovered., thereby not apparent until an autopsy was completed. JMO.

I just wonder why the heck she would want to end the life of her beautiful little daughter!
Click to expand...

Thanks BG- I am sooo frustrated after hearing these new details- Not like it was better when we didnt know....The details are never nice, but I am curious as to what made her snap?

After knowing that it was Emma's daddy's bd, Im wondering if she just did it out of spite? As we are finding out that Stacey isnt the saint her friends are trying portray? What a freaking shame!
 
  • #535
  • #536
Thanks dmk for all your digging around to find informative links.

Lovejac your a sweetheart and love your post to Stacy's BFF...


I am guessing, if I understand everything right, that Stacy wasn't arraigned yesterday because she didn't have an attorney. I don't have time to look but wasn't it mentioned somewhere that she couldn't afford an attorney? I am assuming yesterday was just the process to get it on the record that a court appointed attorney is needed.
 
  • #537
Considering that we now know suffocation was the COD, I'm preparing myself for another lack of news coverage on little Emma.

Hope I'm wrong. Just a hunch because when this crime was committed, the press stopped reporting about it after 3 days or so.

Either way, I want justice served for little Emma.
 
  • #538
bogeygal said:
Considering that we now know suffocation was the COD, I'm preparing myself for another lack of news coverage on little Emma.

Hope I'm wrong. Just a hunch because when this crime was committed, the press stopped reporting about it after 3 days or so.

Either way, I want justice served for little Emma.
Click to expand...

Who wants to help get Emma's story national attention?

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?24
 
  • #539
Im down- I even have a couple different versions to send- Maybe I will update them with yesterdays new developements and now we have actual charges we can put in it!! Its in the works !!!

BTW- Great idea Lovejac :blowkiss:

Lets hope Nancy sees the paralel between Stacey and KC- She would be blind not to, but just in case, I will add that, and maybe get someone's attention ;)

ETA- I just ripped off a LOONG story to her (The text box scrolls FOREVER!!) I almost posted here, but I said some harsh things in connection to KC and the difference between the behavior of Emma's family and GA and CA , I dont want to get a time-out ;)
 
  • #540
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

S
GUILTY CA - Emma Barker, 18 mos, suffocated, Lancaster, 18 March 2009 #2
21 22 23
Replies
456
Views
113K
Ann-Tx
Ann-Tx

Members online

... and 96 more.
Total: 7,319 (members: 97, guests: 7,222)

Online statistics

Members online
97
Guests online
7,222
Total visitors
7,319
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
633,620
Messages
18,645,207
Members
243,620
Latest member
gmarocks
Back
Top